促进儿童和青少年同伴关系干预计划的系统回顾:有效计划中使用的方法和目标

IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Adolescent Research Review Pub Date : 2022-11-24 DOI:10.1007/s40894-022-00195-4
Isabella Pollak, Marija Mitic, James Birchwood, Sylvia Dörfler, Ina Krammer, Jack C. Rogers, Esther Judith Schek, Beate Schrank, Katharina A. M. Stiehl, Kate Anne Woodcock
{"title":"促进儿童和青少年同伴关系干预计划的系统回顾:有效计划中使用的方法和目标","authors":"Isabella Pollak,&nbsp;Marija Mitic,&nbsp;James Birchwood,&nbsp;Sylvia Dörfler,&nbsp;Ina Krammer,&nbsp;Jack C. Rogers,&nbsp;Esther Judith Schek,&nbsp;Beate Schrank,&nbsp;Katharina A. M. Stiehl,&nbsp;Kate Anne Woodcock","doi":"10.1007/s40894-022-00195-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Children’s peer relationships are crucial for their social-emotional development, mental and physical health. To identify effective strategies to facilitate peer relationships among 8–14-year-olds, a systematic review of intervention programs was conducted. Electronic databases ERIC, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Collection Library and grey literature sources were searched for intervention studies with general or clinical populations published between 2000 and 2020. Interventions had to assess quantity or quality of peer relationships as an outcome measure, thus focusing on helping children to establish more positive relationships or improving their self-reported relationship quality. Sixty-five papers were identified and grouped into universal prevention programs, selective interventions for typically developing children and indicated interventions for children with clinical diagnosis. Prevention programs and interventions for typically developing children facilitated peer relationships by targeting mental wellbeing and self-concepts. Clinical interventions focused on social-emotional skills, symptoms and peer behaviors. Successful programs showed a close alignment of methods and targeted program effects. Practitioners should also be aware of realistic goals for each population. Programs for a general population showed potential to decrease loneliness, whereas clinical populations achieved high increases in play dates, peer acceptance and sociometric status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"8 3","pages":"297 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40894-022-00195-4.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Intervention Programs Promoting Peer Relationships Among Children and Adolescents: Methods and Targets Used in Effective Programs\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Pollak,&nbsp;Marija Mitic,&nbsp;James Birchwood,&nbsp;Sylvia Dörfler,&nbsp;Ina Krammer,&nbsp;Jack C. Rogers,&nbsp;Esther Judith Schek,&nbsp;Beate Schrank,&nbsp;Katharina A. M. Stiehl,&nbsp;Kate Anne Woodcock\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40894-022-00195-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Children’s peer relationships are crucial for their social-emotional development, mental and physical health. To identify effective strategies to facilitate peer relationships among 8–14-year-olds, a systematic review of intervention programs was conducted. Electronic databases ERIC, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Collection Library and grey literature sources were searched for intervention studies with general or clinical populations published between 2000 and 2020. Interventions had to assess quantity or quality of peer relationships as an outcome measure, thus focusing on helping children to establish more positive relationships or improving their self-reported relationship quality. Sixty-five papers were identified and grouped into universal prevention programs, selective interventions for typically developing children and indicated interventions for children with clinical diagnosis. Prevention programs and interventions for typically developing children facilitated peer relationships by targeting mental wellbeing and self-concepts. Clinical interventions focused on social-emotional skills, symptoms and peer behaviors. Successful programs showed a close alignment of methods and targeted program effects. Practitioners should also be aware of realistic goals for each population. Programs for a general population showed potential to decrease loneliness, whereas clinical populations achieved high increases in play dates, peer acceptance and sociometric status.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adolescent Research Review\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"297 - 321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40894-022-00195-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adolescent Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-022-00195-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-022-00195-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

儿童的同伴关系对他们的社会情感发展、心理和身体健康至关重要。为了确定促进8-14岁儿童同伴关系的有效策略,对干预计划进行了系统审查。检索电子数据库ERIC、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Cochrane Collection Library和灰色文献来源,检索2000年至2020年间发表的针对普通人群或临床人群的干预研究。干预措施必须评估同伴关系的数量或质量,以此作为结果衡量标准,从而侧重于帮助儿童建立更积极的关系或提高他们自我报告的关系质量。65篇论文被确定并分组为普遍预防计划、针对典型发育中儿童的选择性干预措施和针对临床诊断儿童的指示干预措施。针对典型发展儿童的预防计划和干预措施通过针对心理健康和自我概念促进了同伴关系。临床干预侧重于社交情绪技能、症状和同伴行为。成功的项目显示出方法和有针对性的项目效果的紧密结合。从业者还应该意识到每个人群的现实目标。针对普通人群的项目显示出减少孤独感的潜力,而临床人群在游戏日期、同伴接受度和社会测量地位方面实现了高增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Review of Intervention Programs Promoting Peer Relationships Among Children and Adolescents: Methods and Targets Used in Effective Programs

Children’s peer relationships are crucial for their social-emotional development, mental and physical health. To identify effective strategies to facilitate peer relationships among 8–14-year-olds, a systematic review of intervention programs was conducted. Electronic databases ERIC, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Collection Library and grey literature sources were searched for intervention studies with general or clinical populations published between 2000 and 2020. Interventions had to assess quantity or quality of peer relationships as an outcome measure, thus focusing on helping children to establish more positive relationships or improving their self-reported relationship quality. Sixty-five papers were identified and grouped into universal prevention programs, selective interventions for typically developing children and indicated interventions for children with clinical diagnosis. Prevention programs and interventions for typically developing children facilitated peer relationships by targeting mental wellbeing and self-concepts. Clinical interventions focused on social-emotional skills, symptoms and peer behaviors. Successful programs showed a close alignment of methods and targeted program effects. Practitioners should also be aware of realistic goals for each population. Programs for a general population showed potential to decrease loneliness, whereas clinical populations achieved high increases in play dates, peer acceptance and sociometric status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent Social Media Use and Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review LGBTQ+  Youth Identity Disclosure Processes: A Systematic Review A Systematic Review of the Facilitators and Barriers to Help-Seeking for Self-Harm in Young People: A Systems Thinking Perspective Key Components and Content of Effective Evidence-Based Digital Prevention Programs for Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Umbrella Review The Role of Organized Activities in Supporting Youth Social Capital Development: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1