中国煤制液与碳捕集、封存和利用技术的全生命周期碳足迹及成本评估

IF 3.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Frontiers in Energy Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3
Jingjing Xie, Kai Li, Jingli Fan, Xueting Peng, Jia Li, Yujiao Xian
{"title":"中国煤制液与碳捕集、封存和利用技术的全生命周期碳足迹及成本评估","authors":"Jingjing Xie,&nbsp;Kai Li,&nbsp;Jingli Fan,&nbsp;Xueting Peng,&nbsp;Jia Li,&nbsp;Yujiao Xian","doi":"10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology has the potential to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but its carbon footprint and cost assessment are still insufficient. In this paper, coal mining to oil production is taken as a life cycle to evaluate the carbon footprint and levelized costs of direct-coal-to-liquid and indirect-coal-to-liquid coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology under three scenarios: non capture, process capture, process and public capture throughout the life cycle. The results show that, first, the coupling carbon capture utilization and storage technology can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> footprint by 28%–57% from 5.91 t CO<sub>2</sub>/t oil of direct-coal-to-liquid and 24%–49% from 7.10 t CO<sub>2</sub>/t oil of indirect-coal-to-liquid. Next, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 648–1027 $/t of oil, whereas that of indirect-coal-to-liquid is 653–1065 $/t of oil. When coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 285–1364 $/t of oil, compared to 1101–9793 $/t of oil for indirect-coal-to-liquid. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that CO<sub>2</sub> transportation distance has the greatest impact on carbon footprint, while coal price and initial investment cost significantly affect the levelized cost of coal-to-liquid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":570,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Energy","volume":"17 3","pages":"412 - 427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifecycle carbon footprint and cost assessment for coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology in China\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Xie,&nbsp;Kai Li,&nbsp;Jingli Fan,&nbsp;Xueting Peng,&nbsp;Jia Li,&nbsp;Yujiao Xian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology has the potential to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but its carbon footprint and cost assessment are still insufficient. In this paper, coal mining to oil production is taken as a life cycle to evaluate the carbon footprint and levelized costs of direct-coal-to-liquid and indirect-coal-to-liquid coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology under three scenarios: non capture, process capture, process and public capture throughout the life cycle. The results show that, first, the coupling carbon capture utilization and storage technology can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> footprint by 28%–57% from 5.91 t CO<sub>2</sub>/t oil of direct-coal-to-liquid and 24%–49% from 7.10 t CO<sub>2</sub>/t oil of indirect-coal-to-liquid. Next, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 648–1027 $/t of oil, whereas that of indirect-coal-to-liquid is 653–1065 $/t of oil. When coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 285–1364 $/t of oil, compared to 1101–9793 $/t of oil for indirect-coal-to-liquid. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that CO<sub>2</sub> transportation distance has the greatest impact on carbon footprint, while coal price and initial investment cost significantly affect the levelized cost of coal-to-liquid.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Energy\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"412 - 427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

煤制液结合碳捕集利用与封存技术具有减少二氧化碳排放的潜力,但其碳足迹和成本评估仍然不足。本文以煤炭开采到石油生产为一个生命周期,在全生命周期内非捕集、过程捕集、过程捕集和公共捕集三种场景下,对煤直接制液和煤间接制液耦合碳捕集利用与封存技术的碳足迹和平准化成本进行了评估。结果表明:①碳捕集利用与封存耦合技术可使煤直制油5.91 t CO2/t油降低28% ~ 57%,煤直制油7.10 t CO2/t油降低24% ~ 49%;其次,煤直接制油的平准化成本为648-1027美元/吨石油,而煤间接制油的平准化成本为653-1065美元/吨石油。与碳捕集利用和封存技术相结合,煤直接制油的平均成本为285-1364美元/吨石油,而煤间接制油的平均成本为1101-9793美元/吨石油。最后,敏感性分析表明,CO2运输距离对碳足迹的影响最大,而煤炭价格和初始投资成本对煤制液平准化成本的影响显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lifecycle carbon footprint and cost assessment for coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology in China

The coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions, but its carbon footprint and cost assessment are still insufficient. In this paper, coal mining to oil production is taken as a life cycle to evaluate the carbon footprint and levelized costs of direct-coal-to-liquid and indirect-coal-to-liquid coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology under three scenarios: non capture, process capture, process and public capture throughout the life cycle. The results show that, first, the coupling carbon capture utilization and storage technology can reduce CO2 footprint by 28%–57% from 5.91 t CO2/t oil of direct-coal-to-liquid and 24%–49% from 7.10 t CO2/t oil of indirect-coal-to-liquid. Next, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 648–1027 $/t of oil, whereas that of indirect-coal-to-liquid is 653–1065 $/t of oil. When coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 285–1364 $/t of oil, compared to 1101–9793 $/t of oil for indirect-coal-to-liquid. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that CO2 transportation distance has the greatest impact on carbon footprint, while coal price and initial investment cost significantly affect the levelized cost of coal-to-liquid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Energy
Frontiers in Energy Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
708
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Energy, an interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed international journal launched in January 2007, seeks to provide a rapid and unique platform for reporting the most advanced research on energy technology and strategic thinking in order to promote timely communication between researchers, scientists, engineers, and policy makers in the field of energy. Frontiers in Energy aims to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information for analyses, reviews and evaluations in energy engineering and research, with a strong focus on energy analysis, energy modelling and prediction, integrated energy systems, energy conversion and conservation, energy planning and energy on economic and policy issues. Frontiers in Energy publishes state-of-the-art review articles, original research papers and short communications by individual researchers or research groups. It is strictly peer-reviewed and accepts only original submissions in English. The scope of the journal is broad and covers all latest focus in current energy research. High-quality papers are solicited in, but are not limited to the following areas: -Fundamental energy science -Energy technology, including energy generation, conversion, storage, renewables, transport, urban design and building efficiency -Energy and the environment, including pollution control, energy efficiency and climate change -Energy economics, strategy and policy -Emerging energy issue
期刊最新文献
Performance analysis of a novel medium temperature compressed air energy storage system based on inverter-driven compressor pressure regulation Economically attractive production of commercial-grade gasoline from waste plastics Visualizing unleashed latent heat of liquid metal for soft intelligence Improved cyclic stability of LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 cathode enabled by a novel CEI forming additive A review on plasmonic enhancement of activity and selectivity in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1