{"title":"中国煤制液与碳捕集、封存和利用技术的全生命周期碳足迹及成本评估","authors":"Jingjing Xie, Kai Li, Jingli Fan, Xueting Peng, Jia Li, Yujiao Xian","doi":"10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology has the potential to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but its carbon footprint and cost assessment are still insufficient. In this paper, coal mining to oil production is taken as a life cycle to evaluate the carbon footprint and levelized costs of direct-coal-to-liquid and indirect-coal-to-liquid coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology under three scenarios: non capture, process capture, process and public capture throughout the life cycle. The results show that, first, the coupling carbon capture utilization and storage technology can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> footprint by 28%–57% from 5.91 t CO<sub>2</sub>/t oil of direct-coal-to-liquid and 24%–49% from 7.10 t CO<sub>2</sub>/t oil of indirect-coal-to-liquid. Next, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 648–1027 $/t of oil, whereas that of indirect-coal-to-liquid is 653–1065 $/t of oil. When coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 285–1364 $/t of oil, compared to 1101–9793 $/t of oil for indirect-coal-to-liquid. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that CO<sub>2</sub> transportation distance has the greatest impact on carbon footprint, while coal price and initial investment cost significantly affect the levelized cost of coal-to-liquid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":570,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Energy","volume":"17 3","pages":"412 - 427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifecycle carbon footprint and cost assessment for coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology in China\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Xie, Kai Li, Jingli Fan, Xueting Peng, Jia Li, Yujiao Xian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology has the potential to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but its carbon footprint and cost assessment are still insufficient. In this paper, coal mining to oil production is taken as a life cycle to evaluate the carbon footprint and levelized costs of direct-coal-to-liquid and indirect-coal-to-liquid coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology under three scenarios: non capture, process capture, process and public capture throughout the life cycle. The results show that, first, the coupling carbon capture utilization and storage technology can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> footprint by 28%–57% from 5.91 t CO<sub>2</sub>/t oil of direct-coal-to-liquid and 24%–49% from 7.10 t CO<sub>2</sub>/t oil of indirect-coal-to-liquid. Next, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 648–1027 $/t of oil, whereas that of indirect-coal-to-liquid is 653–1065 $/t of oil. When coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 285–1364 $/t of oil, compared to 1101–9793 $/t of oil for indirect-coal-to-liquid. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that CO<sub>2</sub> transportation distance has the greatest impact on carbon footprint, while coal price and initial investment cost significantly affect the levelized cost of coal-to-liquid.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Energy\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"412 - 427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
煤制液结合碳捕集利用与封存技术具有减少二氧化碳排放的潜力,但其碳足迹和成本评估仍然不足。本文以煤炭开采到石油生产为一个生命周期,在全生命周期内非捕集、过程捕集、过程捕集和公共捕集三种场景下,对煤直接制液和煤间接制液耦合碳捕集利用与封存技术的碳足迹和平准化成本进行了评估。结果表明:①碳捕集利用与封存耦合技术可使煤直制油5.91 t CO2/t油降低28% ~ 57%,煤直制油7.10 t CO2/t油降低24% ~ 49%;其次,煤直接制油的平准化成本为648-1027美元/吨石油,而煤间接制油的平准化成本为653-1065美元/吨石油。与碳捕集利用和封存技术相结合,煤直接制油的平均成本为285-1364美元/吨石油,而煤间接制油的平均成本为1101-9793美元/吨石油。最后,敏感性分析表明,CO2运输距离对碳足迹的影响最大,而煤炭价格和初始投资成本对煤制液平准化成本的影响显著。
Lifecycle carbon footprint and cost assessment for coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology in China
The coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions, but its carbon footprint and cost assessment are still insufficient. In this paper, coal mining to oil production is taken as a life cycle to evaluate the carbon footprint and levelized costs of direct-coal-to-liquid and indirect-coal-to-liquid coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology under three scenarios: non capture, process capture, process and public capture throughout the life cycle. The results show that, first, the coupling carbon capture utilization and storage technology can reduce CO2 footprint by 28%–57% from 5.91 t CO2/t oil of direct-coal-to-liquid and 24%–49% from 7.10 t CO2/t oil of indirect-coal-to-liquid. Next, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 648–1027 $/t of oil, whereas that of indirect-coal-to-liquid is 653–1065 $/t of oil. When coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 285–1364 $/t of oil, compared to 1101–9793 $/t of oil for indirect-coal-to-liquid. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that CO2 transportation distance has the greatest impact on carbon footprint, while coal price and initial investment cost significantly affect the levelized cost of coal-to-liquid.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Energy, an interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed international journal launched in January 2007, seeks to provide a rapid and unique platform for reporting the most advanced research on energy technology and strategic thinking in order to promote timely communication between researchers, scientists, engineers, and policy makers in the field of energy.
Frontiers in Energy aims to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information for analyses, reviews and evaluations in energy engineering and research, with a strong focus on energy analysis, energy modelling and prediction, integrated energy systems, energy conversion and conservation, energy planning and energy on economic and policy issues.
Frontiers in Energy publishes state-of-the-art review articles, original research papers and short communications by individual researchers or research groups. It is strictly peer-reviewed and accepts only original submissions in English. The scope of the journal is broad and covers all latest focus in current energy research.
High-quality papers are solicited in, but are not limited to the following areas:
-Fundamental energy science
-Energy technology, including energy generation, conversion, storage, renewables, transport, urban design and building efficiency
-Energy and the environment, including pollution control, energy efficiency and climate change
-Energy economics, strategy and policy
-Emerging energy issue