不同试验测定小儿患者插管困难的比较

Mehmet Turan Inal, Dilek Memiş, Sevtap Hekimoglu Sahin, Isıl Gunday
{"title":"不同试验测定小儿患者插管困难的比较","authors":"Mehmet Turan Inal,&nbsp;Dilek Memiş,&nbsp;Sevtap Hekimoglu Sahin,&nbsp;Isıl Gunday","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The difficulties with airway management is the main reason for pediatric anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the value of modified Mallampati test, Upper-Lip-Bite test, thyromental distance and the ratio of height to thyromental distance to predict difficult intubation in pediatric patients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and results</h3><p>Data were collected from 5 to 11 years old 250 pediatric patients requiring tracheal intubation. The Cormack and Lehane classification was used to evaluate difficult laryngoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and AUC values for each test were measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity and specificity of modified Mallampati test were 76.92% and 95.54%, while those for ULBT were 69.23% and 97.32%. The optimal cutoff point for the ratio of height to thyromental distance and thyromental distance for predicting difficult laryngoscopy was 23.5 (sensitivity, 57.69%; specificity, 86.61%) and 5.5<!--> <!-->cm (sensitivity, 61.54%; specificity, 99.11%). The modified Mallampati was the most sensitive of the tests. The ratio of height to thyromental distance was the least sensitive test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These results suggested that the modified Mallampati and Upper-Lip-Bite tests may be useful in pediatric patients for predicting difficult intubation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"64 6","pages":"Pages 391-394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.02.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación de diferentes test para determinar la intubación difícil en pacientes pediátricos\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Turan Inal,&nbsp;Dilek Memiş,&nbsp;Sevtap Hekimoglu Sahin,&nbsp;Isıl Gunday\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The difficulties with airway management is the main reason for pediatric anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the value of modified Mallampati test, Upper-Lip-Bite test, thyromental distance and the ratio of height to thyromental distance to predict difficult intubation in pediatric patients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and results</h3><p>Data were collected from 5 to 11 years old 250 pediatric patients requiring tracheal intubation. The Cormack and Lehane classification was used to evaluate difficult laryngoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and AUC values for each test were measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity and specificity of modified Mallampati test were 76.92% and 95.54%, while those for ULBT were 69.23% and 97.32%. The optimal cutoff point for the ratio of height to thyromental distance and thyromental distance for predicting difficult laryngoscopy was 23.5 (sensitivity, 57.69%; specificity, 86.61%) and 5.5<!--> <!-->cm (sensitivity, 61.54%; specificity, 99.11%). The modified Mallampati was the most sensitive of the tests. The ratio of height to thyromental distance was the least sensitive test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These results suggested that the modified Mallampati and Upper-Lip-Bite tests may be useful in pediatric patients for predicting difficult intubation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 391-394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.02.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496314000257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496314000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:气道管理困难是导致小儿麻醉相关发病率和死亡率的主要原因。目的评价改良Mallampati试验、上唇咬合试验、甲状腺距离及身高/甲状腺距离比对小儿插管困难的预测价值。DesignProspective分析。测量和结果收集了250例5至11岁需要气管插管的儿科患者的数据。采用Cormack和Lehane分类来评估困难喉镜检查。测量各项试验的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和AUC值。结果改良Mallampati试验的敏感性和特异性分别为76.92%和95.54%,ULBT试验的敏感性和特异性分别为69.23%和97.32%。身高与甲状腺距离之比及甲状腺距离预测喉镜检查困难的最佳截断点为23.5(敏感性57.69%;特异性,86.61%)和5.5 cm(敏感性,61.54%;特异性,99.11%)。改良的Mallampati是所有测试中最敏感的。身高与甲状腺距离之比是最不敏感的指标。结论改进的Mallampati和上唇咬合试验可用于预测儿科患者插管困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparación de diferentes test para determinar la intubación difícil en pacientes pediátricos

Background

The difficulties with airway management is the main reason for pediatric anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality.

Objective

To assess the value of modified Mallampati test, Upper-Lip-Bite test, thyromental distance and the ratio of height to thyromental distance to predict difficult intubation in pediatric patients.

Design

Prospective analysis.

Measurements and results

Data were collected from 5 to 11 years old 250 pediatric patients requiring tracheal intubation. The Cormack and Lehane classification was used to evaluate difficult laryngoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and AUC values for each test were measured.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of modified Mallampati test were 76.92% and 95.54%, while those for ULBT were 69.23% and 97.32%. The optimal cutoff point for the ratio of height to thyromental distance and thyromental distance for predicting difficult laryngoscopy was 23.5 (sensitivity, 57.69%; specificity, 86.61%) and 5.5 cm (sensitivity, 61.54%; specificity, 99.11%). The modified Mallampati was the most sensitive of the tests. The ratio of height to thyromental distance was the least sensitive test.

Conclusion

These results suggested that the modified Mallampati and Upper-Lip-Bite tests may be useful in pediatric patients for predicting difficult intubation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía de atresia de esófago en un neonato con síndrome de Goldenhar Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea Endarterectomía carotídea: revisión de 10 años de práctica de la anestesia general y locorregional en un hospital terciario en Portugal Efecto de la rotación de la cabeza en la presión intraocular en decúbito ventral: estudio aleatorizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1