腹腔镜胆囊切除术全静脉麻醉无阿片类药物,异丙酚、右美托咪定和利多卡因输注:前瞻性、随机、双盲研究

Mefkur Bakan , Tarik Umutoglu , Ufuk Topuz , Harun Uysal , Mehmet Bayram , Huseyin Kadioglu , Ziya Salihoglu
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术全静脉麻醉无阿片类药物,异丙酚、右美托咪定和利多卡因输注:前瞻性、随机、双盲研究","authors":"Mefkur Bakan ,&nbsp;Tarik Umutoglu ,&nbsp;Ufuk Topuz ,&nbsp;Harun Uysal ,&nbsp;Mehmet Bayram ,&nbsp;Huseyin Kadioglu ,&nbsp;Ziya Salihoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Intraoperative use of opioids may be associated with postoperative hyperalgesia and increased analgesic consumption. Side effects due to perioperative use of opioids, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting may delay discharge. We hypothesized that total intravenous anesthesia consisting of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute may be an alternative technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and would be associated with lower fentanyl requirements in the postoperative period and less incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty ASA I-II adults were scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups to have either opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, and propofol infusions (Group DL) or opioid-based anesthesia with remifentanil, and propofol infusions (Group RF). All patients received a standard multimodal analgesia regimen. A patient controlled analgesia device was set to deliver intravenous fentanyl for 6<!--> <!-->h after surgery. The primary outcome variable was postoperative fentanyl consumption.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fentanyl consumption at postoperative 2nd hour was statistically significantly less in Group DL, compared with Group RF, which were 75<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->59<!--> <!-->μg and 120<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->94<!--> <!-->μg respectively, while it was comparable at postoperative 6<!--> <!-->th hour. During anesthesia, there were more hypotensive events in Group RF, while there were more hypertensive events in Group DL, which were both statistically significant. Despite higher recovery times, Group DL had significantly lower pain scores, rescue analgesic and ondansetron need.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, lidocaine and propofol infusions may be an alternative technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy especially in patients with high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 3","pages":"Pages 191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anestesia venosa total libre de opiáceos, con infusiones de propofol, dexmedetomidina y lidocaína para la colecistectomía laparoscópica: estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego\",\"authors\":\"Mefkur Bakan ,&nbsp;Tarik Umutoglu ,&nbsp;Ufuk Topuz ,&nbsp;Harun Uysal ,&nbsp;Mehmet Bayram ,&nbsp;Huseyin Kadioglu ,&nbsp;Ziya Salihoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Intraoperative use of opioids may be associated with postoperative hyperalgesia and increased analgesic consumption. Side effects due to perioperative use of opioids, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting may delay discharge. We hypothesized that total intravenous anesthesia consisting of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute may be an alternative technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and would be associated with lower fentanyl requirements in the postoperative period and less incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty ASA I-II adults were scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups to have either opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, and propofol infusions (Group DL) or opioid-based anesthesia with remifentanil, and propofol infusions (Group RF). All patients received a standard multimodal analgesia regimen. A patient controlled analgesia device was set to deliver intravenous fentanyl for 6<!--> <!-->h after surgery. The primary outcome variable was postoperative fentanyl consumption.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fentanyl consumption at postoperative 2nd hour was statistically significantly less in Group DL, compared with Group RF, which were 75<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->59<!--> <!-->μg and 120<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->94<!--> <!-->μg respectively, while it was comparable at postoperative 6<!--> <!-->th hour. During anesthesia, there were more hypotensive events in Group RF, while there were more hypertensive events in Group DL, which were both statistically significant. Despite higher recovery times, Group DL had significantly lower pain scores, rescue analgesic and ondansetron need.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, lidocaine and propofol infusions may be an alternative technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy especially in patients with high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 191-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.008\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的术中使用阿片类药物可能与术后痛觉过敏和镇痛药消耗增加有关。由于围手术期使用阿片类药物的副作用,如术后恶心和呕吐可能延迟出院。我们假设,由利多卡因和右美托咪定组成的全静脉麻醉作为阿片类药物的替代品可能是腹腔镜胆囊切除术的一种替代技术,并且可以降低术后对芬太尼的需求,减少术后恶心和呕吐的发生率。方法选择80例ASA I-II级成人行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术。患者被随机分为两组,分别采用右美托咪定、利多卡因和异丙酚输注的无阿片类麻醉(DL组)或瑞芬太尼和异丙酚输注的阿片类麻醉(RF组)。所有患者均接受标准的多模式镇痛方案。术后设置患者自控镇痛装置,静脉注射芬太尼6小时。主要结局变量为术后芬太尼用量。结果DL组术后2 h芬太尼用量(75±59 μg)显著低于RF组(120±94 μg);术后6 h芬太尼用量(120±94 μg)显著低于RF组(75±59 μg)。麻醉期间,RF组低血压事件较多,DL组高血压事件较多,差异均有统计学意义。尽管恢复时间较长,但DL组的疼痛评分、救援镇痛药和昂丹司琼需求均显著降低。结论右美托咪定、利多卡因和异丙酚输注无阿片类药物麻醉可作为腹腔镜胆囊切除术的替代麻醉方法,尤其适用于术后恶心、呕吐高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anestesia venosa total libre de opiáceos, con infusiones de propofol, dexmedetomidina y lidocaína para la colecistectomía laparoscópica: estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego

Background and objectives

Intraoperative use of opioids may be associated with postoperative hyperalgesia and increased analgesic consumption. Side effects due to perioperative use of opioids, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting may delay discharge. We hypothesized that total intravenous anesthesia consisting of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute may be an alternative technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and would be associated with lower fentanyl requirements in the postoperative period and less incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Methods

Eighty ASA I-II adults were scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups to have either opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, and propofol infusions (Group DL) or opioid-based anesthesia with remifentanil, and propofol infusions (Group RF). All patients received a standard multimodal analgesia regimen. A patient controlled analgesia device was set to deliver intravenous fentanyl for 6 h after surgery. The primary outcome variable was postoperative fentanyl consumption.

Results

Fentanyl consumption at postoperative 2nd hour was statistically significantly less in Group DL, compared with Group RF, which were 75 ± 59 μg and 120 ± 94 μg respectively, while it was comparable at postoperative 6 th hour. During anesthesia, there were more hypotensive events in Group RF, while there were more hypertensive events in Group DL, which were both statistically significant. Despite higher recovery times, Group DL had significantly lower pain scores, rescue analgesic and ondansetron need.

Conclusion

Opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, lidocaine and propofol infusions may be an alternative technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy especially in patients with high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manejo anestésico para la cirugía de atresia de esófago en un neonato con síndrome de Goldenhar Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea Endarterectomía carotídea: revisión de 10 años de práctica de la anestesia general y locorregional en un hospital terciario en Portugal Efecto de la rotación de la cabeza en la presión intraocular en decúbito ventral: estudio aleatorizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1