小心缝隙!

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1026/0049-8637/a000218
M. Theobald, Henrik Bellhäuser
{"title":"小心缝隙!","authors":"M. Theobald, Henrik Bellhäuser","doi":"10.1026/0049-8637/a000218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The goal of this study was to investigate the dynamic interplay of affect and time investment during exam preparation using daily learning diaries. University students ( N = 56) reported a simultaneous increase in negative affect as well as intended and actual time investment over the course of the survey period (30 days). Cramming of study time partially accounted for the increase in negative affect. More planning strategies were associated with lower negative and more positive affect. Unmet time schedules predicted higher negative and lower positive affect. Results further revealed compensatory feedback loops: Higher negative affect in the evening predicted higher intended time investment on the next morning, but without improvements in planning strategies. Results suggest that unmet time schedules could contribute to the increase in negative affect during exam preparation. Interventions should promote students’ planning to reduce the difference between intended and actual time investment.","PeriodicalId":45028,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the Gap!\",\"authors\":\"M. Theobald, Henrik Bellhäuser\",\"doi\":\"10.1026/0049-8637/a000218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The goal of this study was to investigate the dynamic interplay of affect and time investment during exam preparation using daily learning diaries. University students ( N = 56) reported a simultaneous increase in negative affect as well as intended and actual time investment over the course of the survey period (30 days). Cramming of study time partially accounted for the increase in negative affect. More planning strategies were associated with lower negative and more positive affect. Unmet time schedules predicted higher negative and lower positive affect. Results further revealed compensatory feedback loops: Higher negative affect in the evening predicted higher intended time investment on the next morning, but without improvements in planning strategies. Results suggest that unmet time schedules could contribute to the increase in negative affect during exam preparation. Interventions should promote students’ planning to reduce the difference between intended and actual time investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000218\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Entwicklungspsychologie Und Padagogische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是探讨情感和时间投入在考试准备过程中的动态相互作用。在调查期间(30天),大学生(N = 56)报告了负面影响的同时增加,以及预期和实际投入的时间。死记硬背的学习时间是负面情绪增加的部分原因。更多的计划策略与更低的消极影响和更多的积极影响相关。未完成的时间表预测更高的负面影响和更低的积极影响。结果进一步揭示了补偿性反馈循环:晚上的负面情绪越高,第二天早上的预期时间投入就越高,但计划策略没有改善。结果表明,未完成的时间安排可能会增加考试准备期间的负面情绪。干预措施应促进学生的计划,以减少预期和实际投入的时间差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mind the Gap!
Abstract. The goal of this study was to investigate the dynamic interplay of affect and time investment during exam preparation using daily learning diaries. University students ( N = 56) reported a simultaneous increase in negative affect as well as intended and actual time investment over the course of the survey period (30 days). Cramming of study time partially accounted for the increase in negative affect. More planning strategies were associated with lower negative and more positive affect. Unmet time schedules predicted higher negative and lower positive affect. Results further revealed compensatory feedback loops: Higher negative affect in the evening predicted higher intended time investment on the next morning, but without improvements in planning strategies. Results suggest that unmet time schedules could contribute to the increase in negative affect during exam preparation. Interventions should promote students’ planning to reduce the difference between intended and actual time investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs) und der Fachgruppen Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie
期刊最新文献
Immediate Learning Benefits of Retrieval Tasks Can Monitoring Prompts Help to Reduce a Confidence Bias When Learning With Multimedia? Adolescents’ Social Goal Orientations Metacomprehension in Multiple Document Reading 7- and 8-Year-Olds’ Struggle With Monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1