{"title":"在通识教育设置中连结简短功能分析与干预设计。","authors":"Tifanie Ishuin","doi":"10.1037/H0100663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional analysis has been shown to be an effective assessment tool for identifying the environmental variables maintaining a wide range of problematic behavior in various settings (Derby et al. 1992; Mace & Lalli, 1991; Northup et al., 1991; Sasso et al., 1992; Wacker et al., 1994; Wilder, Chen, Atwell, Pritchard, & Weinstein, 2006; Wilder, Harris, Reagan, & Rasey, 2007). Despite numerous studies in the literature that supply evidence for the utility of functional analyses, this assessment tool has not been readily adopted in general education settings. The rationale for the lack of integration are cited as being due to time constraints, the general complexity of the analysis, as well as the impractical nature of this method for use in many public school districts (Axelrod, 1987; Tincani, Castrogiavanni, & Axelrod, 1999). Similar reasoning could also be given for the lack of adoption by behavior analysts to fully market this method of assessment when consulting in general education settings. As a result, teachers, behavior analysts, and other professionals may instead choose to use less reliable assessment methods in order to obtain similar conclusions for the relationships between behavior and the environment (Northup et al., 1991). Still the evidence is definitively clear that functional analysis is the most effective method for identifying the relationship between the environment and behavior (Derby et al., 1992; Wacker et al., 1994). The link between the identification of the contingencies maintaining problematic behavior and the intervention designed and chosen to produce a targeted behavior change has significant implications. Past studies have shown that the accurate identification of behavioral function is crucial to designing an intervention which focuses on replacing the socially inappropriate behavior with an appropriate alternative that will serve the same function (Carr & Durand, 1985; Derby et al., 1992; Mace & Lalli, 1991; Northup et al., 1991; Sasso et al., 1992; Tincani, et al., 1999; Wilder et al., 2007). Brief functional analyses are less time consuming than traditional or extended functional analyses and offer an effective alternative approach in settings in which time, resources, and staffing limitations cannot be made more accommodating (Derby et al., Tincani et al., 1999; Wacker et al., 1994; Wilder et al., 2006; Wilder et al., 2007). Although functional assessments are traditionally performed in least restrictive environments, brief functional analyses may produce more accurate and clear results as well as take less time to conduct. For this reason, general education settings could more readily use this assessment tool in situations in which the maintaining variables may be confounded by simultaneously occurring consequences in the natural environment (e.g. attention and escape). The importance of accurately assessing the function of problematic behavior to determine a functionally equivalent intervention remains an indisputable fact within behavior analysis studies in any setting. The purpose of this research study was to first conduct a brief functional analysis to determine the function maintaining noncompliant behavior and then to determine a function-based intervention centered on analysis results in a general education setting. A short-term evaluation documented the effectiveness of the proposed function-based intervention. This brief study extends the research to general education settings and provides further basis for the utility of brief functional analyses in the least restrictive environments. METHOD Participant The participant in this study was a student who attended a regular education preschool program. Michael was a four-year old boy who attended a regular education preschool program. He had not received a diagnosis at the time of this study. The behavior of concern was non-compliance which Michael exhibited by remaining stationary when given a direction, throwing objects, and/or vocally stating \"no. …","PeriodicalId":88717,"journal":{"name":"The behavior analyst today","volume":"10 1","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking Brief Functional Analysis to Intervention Design in General Education Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Tifanie Ishuin\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/H0100663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Functional analysis has been shown to be an effective assessment tool for identifying the environmental variables maintaining a wide range of problematic behavior in various settings (Derby et al. 1992; Mace & Lalli, 1991; Northup et al., 1991; Sasso et al., 1992; Wacker et al., 1994; Wilder, Chen, Atwell, Pritchard, & Weinstein, 2006; Wilder, Harris, Reagan, & Rasey, 2007). Despite numerous studies in the literature that supply evidence for the utility of functional analyses, this assessment tool has not been readily adopted in general education settings. The rationale for the lack of integration are cited as being due to time constraints, the general complexity of the analysis, as well as the impractical nature of this method for use in many public school districts (Axelrod, 1987; Tincani, Castrogiavanni, & Axelrod, 1999). Similar reasoning could also be given for the lack of adoption by behavior analysts to fully market this method of assessment when consulting in general education settings. As a result, teachers, behavior analysts, and other professionals may instead choose to use less reliable assessment methods in order to obtain similar conclusions for the relationships between behavior and the environment (Northup et al., 1991). Still the evidence is definitively clear that functional analysis is the most effective method for identifying the relationship between the environment and behavior (Derby et al., 1992; Wacker et al., 1994). The link between the identification of the contingencies maintaining problematic behavior and the intervention designed and chosen to produce a targeted behavior change has significant implications. Past studies have shown that the accurate identification of behavioral function is crucial to designing an intervention which focuses on replacing the socially inappropriate behavior with an appropriate alternative that will serve the same function (Carr & Durand, 1985; Derby et al., 1992; Mace & Lalli, 1991; Northup et al., 1991; Sasso et al., 1992; Tincani, et al., 1999; Wilder et al., 2007). Brief functional analyses are less time consuming than traditional or extended functional analyses and offer an effective alternative approach in settings in which time, resources, and staffing limitations cannot be made more accommodating (Derby et al., Tincani et al., 1999; Wacker et al., 1994; Wilder et al., 2006; Wilder et al., 2007). Although functional assessments are traditionally performed in least restrictive environments, brief functional analyses may produce more accurate and clear results as well as take less time to conduct. For this reason, general education settings could more readily use this assessment tool in situations in which the maintaining variables may be confounded by simultaneously occurring consequences in the natural environment (e.g. attention and escape). The importance of accurately assessing the function of problematic behavior to determine a functionally equivalent intervention remains an indisputable fact within behavior analysis studies in any setting. The purpose of this research study was to first conduct a brief functional analysis to determine the function maintaining noncompliant behavior and then to determine a function-based intervention centered on analysis results in a general education setting. A short-term evaluation documented the effectiveness of the proposed function-based intervention. This brief study extends the research to general education settings and provides further basis for the utility of brief functional analyses in the least restrictive environments. METHOD Participant The participant in this study was a student who attended a regular education preschool program. Michael was a four-year old boy who attended a regular education preschool program. He had not received a diagnosis at the time of this study. The behavior of concern was non-compliance which Michael exhibited by remaining stationary when given a direction, throwing objects, and/or vocally stating \\\"no. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":88717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The behavior analyst today\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"47-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The behavior analyst today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The behavior analyst today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
功能分析已被证明是一种有效的评估工具,用于识别在各种设置中维持各种问题行为的环境变量(Derby等人,1992;Mace & Lalli, 1991;Northup et al., 1991;Sasso et al., 1992;Wacker et al., 1994;Wilder, Chen, Atwell, Pritchard, & Weinstein, 2006;Wilder, Harris, Reagan, & Rasey, 2007)。尽管文献中有许多研究为功能分析的实用性提供了证据,但这种评估工具尚未在普通教育环境中得到采用。缺乏整合的理由被引用为由于时间限制,分析的一般复杂性,以及这种方法在许多公立学区使用的不切实际的性质(Axelrod, 1987;Tincani, Castrogiavanni, & Axelrod, 1999)。在普通教育环境中进行咨询时,行为分析师没有充分采用这种评估方法,也可以给出类似的理由。因此,教师、行为分析师和其他专业人员可能会选择使用不太可靠的评估方法,以获得行为与环境之间关系的类似结论(Northup et al., 1991)。尽管如此,证据确凿地表明,功能分析是识别环境与行为之间关系的最有效方法(Derby et al., 1992;Wacker et al., 1994)。识别维持问题行为的偶然事件与设计和选择干预措施以产生有针对性的行为改变之间的联系具有重要意义。过去的研究表明,行为功能的准确识别对于设计干预措施至关重要,该干预措施的重点是用具有相同功能的适当替代行为取代社会不当行为(Carr & Durand, 1985;Derby et al., 1992;Mace & Lalli, 1991;Northup et al., 1991;Sasso et al., 1992;Tincani等人,1999;Wilder et al., 2007)。简短的功能分析比传统的或扩展的功能分析更节省时间,并且在时间、资源和人员限制不能更加适应的情况下提供了一种有效的替代方法(Derby等人,Tincani等人,1999;Wacker et al., 1994;Wilder et al., 2006;Wilder et al., 2007)。虽然功能评估传统上是在限制最少的环境中执行的,但是简短的功能分析可以产生更准确和清晰的结果,并且花费更少的时间来执行。出于这个原因,普通教育机构可以更容易地使用这种评估工具,在这种情况下,维持变量可能被自然环境中同时发生的后果混淆(例如,注意力和逃跑)。在任何情况下,准确评估问题行为的功能以确定功能等效的干预措施的重要性仍然是行为分析研究中不争的事实。本研究的目的是首先进行简短的功能分析,以确定维持不服从行为的功能,然后在普通教育环境中以分析结果为中心确定基于功能的干预措施。一项短期评估证明了建议的基于功能的干预措施的有效性。这项简短的研究将研究扩展到普通教育环境,并为在限制最少的环境中使用简短的功能分析提供了进一步的基础。方法参与者本研究的参与者是一名参加正规学前教育项目的学生。迈克尔是一个四岁的男孩,他参加了一个正规的学前教育项目。在本研究时,他没有接受过诊断。值得关注的行为是迈克尔表现出的不服从行为,当被指示时保持静止,扔东西,和/或口头说“不”。…
Linking Brief Functional Analysis to Intervention Design in General Education Settings.
Functional analysis has been shown to be an effective assessment tool for identifying the environmental variables maintaining a wide range of problematic behavior in various settings (Derby et al. 1992; Mace & Lalli, 1991; Northup et al., 1991; Sasso et al., 1992; Wacker et al., 1994; Wilder, Chen, Atwell, Pritchard, & Weinstein, 2006; Wilder, Harris, Reagan, & Rasey, 2007). Despite numerous studies in the literature that supply evidence for the utility of functional analyses, this assessment tool has not been readily adopted in general education settings. The rationale for the lack of integration are cited as being due to time constraints, the general complexity of the analysis, as well as the impractical nature of this method for use in many public school districts (Axelrod, 1987; Tincani, Castrogiavanni, & Axelrod, 1999). Similar reasoning could also be given for the lack of adoption by behavior analysts to fully market this method of assessment when consulting in general education settings. As a result, teachers, behavior analysts, and other professionals may instead choose to use less reliable assessment methods in order to obtain similar conclusions for the relationships between behavior and the environment (Northup et al., 1991). Still the evidence is definitively clear that functional analysis is the most effective method for identifying the relationship between the environment and behavior (Derby et al., 1992; Wacker et al., 1994). The link between the identification of the contingencies maintaining problematic behavior and the intervention designed and chosen to produce a targeted behavior change has significant implications. Past studies have shown that the accurate identification of behavioral function is crucial to designing an intervention which focuses on replacing the socially inappropriate behavior with an appropriate alternative that will serve the same function (Carr & Durand, 1985; Derby et al., 1992; Mace & Lalli, 1991; Northup et al., 1991; Sasso et al., 1992; Tincani, et al., 1999; Wilder et al., 2007). Brief functional analyses are less time consuming than traditional or extended functional analyses and offer an effective alternative approach in settings in which time, resources, and staffing limitations cannot be made more accommodating (Derby et al., Tincani et al., 1999; Wacker et al., 1994; Wilder et al., 2006; Wilder et al., 2007). Although functional assessments are traditionally performed in least restrictive environments, brief functional analyses may produce more accurate and clear results as well as take less time to conduct. For this reason, general education settings could more readily use this assessment tool in situations in which the maintaining variables may be confounded by simultaneously occurring consequences in the natural environment (e.g. attention and escape). The importance of accurately assessing the function of problematic behavior to determine a functionally equivalent intervention remains an indisputable fact within behavior analysis studies in any setting. The purpose of this research study was to first conduct a brief functional analysis to determine the function maintaining noncompliant behavior and then to determine a function-based intervention centered on analysis results in a general education setting. A short-term evaluation documented the effectiveness of the proposed function-based intervention. This brief study extends the research to general education settings and provides further basis for the utility of brief functional analyses in the least restrictive environments. METHOD Participant The participant in this study was a student who attended a regular education preschool program. Michael was a four-year old boy who attended a regular education preschool program. He had not received a diagnosis at the time of this study. The behavior of concern was non-compliance which Michael exhibited by remaining stationary when given a direction, throwing objects, and/or vocally stating "no. …