Jessica Singer-Dudek, JeanneMarie Speckman, Robin Nuzzolo
{"title":"弗雷德·s·凯勒学校CABAS教育模式的比较分析:20年回顾。","authors":"Jessica Singer-Dudek, JeanneMarie Speckman, Robin Nuzzolo","doi":"10.1037/H0100705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Comprehensive Application of Behavior Analysis to Schooling, or CABAS[R], model of education has been in existence for almost three decades. CABAS[R] is a data-driven, researchbased system that takes into account the interdependent relationship between teachers, students and their parents, and school supervisory personnel, whose primary function is to train and mentor teachers to continually apply the principles and tactics of the science of behavior to ensure student success. A university graduate training program ensures that the training incorporates the latest scientific findings and consultation to board certified schools by CABAS[R] Professional Advisory Board members, who are themselves senior behavior analysts and research scientists, ensures the accurate implementation of all components of the CABAS[R] model. Students are at the center of the system and it is continuous measurement of their behaviors that provides evidence of the effectiveness of the system. CABAS[R] also includes a behavioral parent education program (please refer to Greer, 2002 or Greer, Keohane, & Healy, 2002) for a full description of these CABAS[R] components). All those involved are responsive to student data, at the level of the individual child, classroom, or school as a whole. CABAS[R] is a cybernetic system, at the heart of which lie the students. Our students' achievement is directly tied to their teachers' expertise (Greer, 2002; Greer, et al, 2002). Students learn only as fast as their teachers can teach them. The amount of instruction received (measured in learn units, described later in this paper) and the number of objectives achieved by students is a direct measure of teacher behavior. And, those objectives are tied directly to state standards, so our teachers are accountable at all levels for the achievement of their students. Our model is designed such that, just as teachers are responsible for their students' achievement, teacher mentors and behavior analyst supervisors are responsible for the performance of their teachers. And beyond that, CABAS[R] consultants and university faculty are responsible for the performance of teacher mentors and behavior analysts. CABAS[R] meets the criteria set forth by the No Child Left Behind act (NCLB), including: 1) accountability for results, as evidenced by a set of measures reflecting both teacher and student performance across the entire school year, 2) scientifically-based instruction, as evidenced by the use of tactics from the research literature of the science of behavior, 3) highly qualified teachers and teaching assistants, accomplished through a three-tiered personalized system of instruction that includes a teacher training and observation component as well as other outcome-based measures of teacher expertise, and 4) assessment of individualized student progress, including the use of criterion-referenced assessments and curricula tied to state standards. The CABAS[R] model also contains components which meet the definition of a Response to Instruction Model (RTI) (Vaughn & Fuchs, 2003) in that 1) all students are assessed for repertoires and capabilities, 2) responses to instruction are monitored, 3) data are analyzed and a course of action is determined, 4) all decisions regarding interventions are individualized to the specific student and 5) the integrity of the implementation of tactics is closely monitored. Interventions in an RTI model are multi-tiered, with students who are not responding to intervention moving to a more rigorous or simply different tier of intervention. Our decision analysis protocol, described later in this paper, was designed to analyze learning problems within the context of the instructional setting and, in response, implement appropriate tactics based on where the learning problem existed (e.g., lack of prerequisite skills; motivation, instructional history, conditioned reinforcement). In summary, the CABAS[R] model of education employs a science of pedagogy to all aspects of teaching and learning. …","PeriodicalId":88717,"journal":{"name":"The behavior analyst today","volume":"11 1","pages":"253-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of the CABAS Model of Education at the Fred S. Keller School: A Twenty-Year Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Singer-Dudek, JeanneMarie Speckman, Robin Nuzzolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/H0100705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Comprehensive Application of Behavior Analysis to Schooling, or CABAS[R], model of education has been in existence for almost three decades. CABAS[R] is a data-driven, researchbased system that takes into account the interdependent relationship between teachers, students and their parents, and school supervisory personnel, whose primary function is to train and mentor teachers to continually apply the principles and tactics of the science of behavior to ensure student success. A university graduate training program ensures that the training incorporates the latest scientific findings and consultation to board certified schools by CABAS[R] Professional Advisory Board members, who are themselves senior behavior analysts and research scientists, ensures the accurate implementation of all components of the CABAS[R] model. Students are at the center of the system and it is continuous measurement of their behaviors that provides evidence of the effectiveness of the system. CABAS[R] also includes a behavioral parent education program (please refer to Greer, 2002 or Greer, Keohane, & Healy, 2002) for a full description of these CABAS[R] components). All those involved are responsive to student data, at the level of the individual child, classroom, or school as a whole. CABAS[R] is a cybernetic system, at the heart of which lie the students. Our students' achievement is directly tied to their teachers' expertise (Greer, 2002; Greer, et al, 2002). Students learn only as fast as their teachers can teach them. The amount of instruction received (measured in learn units, described later in this paper) and the number of objectives achieved by students is a direct measure of teacher behavior. And, those objectives are tied directly to state standards, so our teachers are accountable at all levels for the achievement of their students. Our model is designed such that, just as teachers are responsible for their students' achievement, teacher mentors and behavior analyst supervisors are responsible for the performance of their teachers. And beyond that, CABAS[R] consultants and university faculty are responsible for the performance of teacher mentors and behavior analysts. CABAS[R] meets the criteria set forth by the No Child Left Behind act (NCLB), including: 1) accountability for results, as evidenced by a set of measures reflecting both teacher and student performance across the entire school year, 2) scientifically-based instruction, as evidenced by the use of tactics from the research literature of the science of behavior, 3) highly qualified teachers and teaching assistants, accomplished through a three-tiered personalized system of instruction that includes a teacher training and observation component as well as other outcome-based measures of teacher expertise, and 4) assessment of individualized student progress, including the use of criterion-referenced assessments and curricula tied to state standards. The CABAS[R] model also contains components which meet the definition of a Response to Instruction Model (RTI) (Vaughn & Fuchs, 2003) in that 1) all students are assessed for repertoires and capabilities, 2) responses to instruction are monitored, 3) data are analyzed and a course of action is determined, 4) all decisions regarding interventions are individualized to the specific student and 5) the integrity of the implementation of tactics is closely monitored. Interventions in an RTI model are multi-tiered, with students who are not responding to intervention moving to a more rigorous or simply different tier of intervention. Our decision analysis protocol, described later in this paper, was designed to analyze learning problems within the context of the instructional setting and, in response, implement appropriate tactics based on where the learning problem existed (e.g., lack of prerequisite skills; motivation, instructional history, conditioned reinforcement). In summary, the CABAS[R] model of education employs a science of pedagogy to all aspects of teaching and learning. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":88717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The behavior analyst today\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"253-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The behavior analyst today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The behavior analyst today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
摘要
行为分析在学校教育中的综合应用(Comprehensive Application of Behavior Analysis to Schooling,简称CABAS)这一教育模式已经存在了近30年。CABAS[R]是一个数据驱动的、基于研究的系统,它考虑了教师、学生及其家长和学校管理人员之间的相互依存关系,其主要功能是培训和指导教师不断应用行为科学的原则和策略,以确保学生的成功。大学毕业生培训计划确保培训包含最新的科学发现和咨询,由CABAS[R]专业顾问委员会成员(他们本身就是高级行为分析师和研究科学家)向董事会认证的学校提供咨询,确保准确实施CABAS[R]模型的所有组成部分。学生是系统的中心,对他们行为的持续测量为系统的有效性提供了证据。CABAS[R]还包括一个行为父母教育计划(请参阅Greer, 2002或Greer, Keohane, & Healy, 2002),了解这些CABAS[R]组成部分的完整描述)。所有相关人员都对学生数据做出响应,无论是在个别孩子、教室还是整个学校的层面上。CABAS[R]是一个控制论系统,其核心是学生。我们的学生的成绩与他们的老师的专业知识直接相关(Greer, 2002;Greer等人,2002)。学生只能按照老师教他们的速度学习。接受的教学量(以学习单位衡量,本文稍后将介绍)和学生实现的目标数量是衡量教师行为的直接指标。而且,这些目标直接与州标准挂钩,因此我们的教师在各个层面上都对学生的成就负责。我们的模型是这样设计的,就像教师对学生的成就负责一样,教师导师和行为分析主管对教师的表现负责。除此之外,CABAS[R]顾问和大学教师对教师导师和行为分析师的绩效负责。CABAS[R]符合《不让一个孩子掉队法》(NCLB)规定的标准,包括:1)对结果负责,通过一系列反映整个学年教师和学生表现的措施来证明;2)基于科学的教学,通过使用行为科学研究文献中的策略来证明;3)高素质的教师和助教;通过三个层次的个性化教学系统来完成,包括教师培训和观察部分,以及其他基于结果的教师专业知识措施,以及对个性化学生进步的评估,包括使用标准参考评估和与州标准挂钩的课程。CABAS[R]模型还包含了满足对教学反应模型(RTI) (Vaughn & Fuchs, 2003)定义的组件,其中1)评估所有学生的曲目和能力,2)监测对教学的反应,3)分析数据并确定行动方案,4)所有有关干预的决策都针对特定学生进行个性化处理,5)密切监测战术实施的完整性。RTI模式中的干预是多层次的,对干预没有反应的学生将转向更严格或不同层次的干预。我们的决策分析协议,在本文后面描述,旨在分析教学环境中的学习问题,并根据学习问题存在的地方(例如,缺乏先决技能;动机,教学历史,条件强化)。总之,CABAS[R]教育模式将教育学科学应用于教与学的各个方面。...
A Comparative Analysis of the CABAS Model of Education at the Fred S. Keller School: A Twenty-Year Review.
The Comprehensive Application of Behavior Analysis to Schooling, or CABAS[R], model of education has been in existence for almost three decades. CABAS[R] is a data-driven, researchbased system that takes into account the interdependent relationship between teachers, students and their parents, and school supervisory personnel, whose primary function is to train and mentor teachers to continually apply the principles and tactics of the science of behavior to ensure student success. A university graduate training program ensures that the training incorporates the latest scientific findings and consultation to board certified schools by CABAS[R] Professional Advisory Board members, who are themselves senior behavior analysts and research scientists, ensures the accurate implementation of all components of the CABAS[R] model. Students are at the center of the system and it is continuous measurement of their behaviors that provides evidence of the effectiveness of the system. CABAS[R] also includes a behavioral parent education program (please refer to Greer, 2002 or Greer, Keohane, & Healy, 2002) for a full description of these CABAS[R] components). All those involved are responsive to student data, at the level of the individual child, classroom, or school as a whole. CABAS[R] is a cybernetic system, at the heart of which lie the students. Our students' achievement is directly tied to their teachers' expertise (Greer, 2002; Greer, et al, 2002). Students learn only as fast as their teachers can teach them. The amount of instruction received (measured in learn units, described later in this paper) and the number of objectives achieved by students is a direct measure of teacher behavior. And, those objectives are tied directly to state standards, so our teachers are accountable at all levels for the achievement of their students. Our model is designed such that, just as teachers are responsible for their students' achievement, teacher mentors and behavior analyst supervisors are responsible for the performance of their teachers. And beyond that, CABAS[R] consultants and university faculty are responsible for the performance of teacher mentors and behavior analysts. CABAS[R] meets the criteria set forth by the No Child Left Behind act (NCLB), including: 1) accountability for results, as evidenced by a set of measures reflecting both teacher and student performance across the entire school year, 2) scientifically-based instruction, as evidenced by the use of tactics from the research literature of the science of behavior, 3) highly qualified teachers and teaching assistants, accomplished through a three-tiered personalized system of instruction that includes a teacher training and observation component as well as other outcome-based measures of teacher expertise, and 4) assessment of individualized student progress, including the use of criterion-referenced assessments and curricula tied to state standards. The CABAS[R] model also contains components which meet the definition of a Response to Instruction Model (RTI) (Vaughn & Fuchs, 2003) in that 1) all students are assessed for repertoires and capabilities, 2) responses to instruction are monitored, 3) data are analyzed and a course of action is determined, 4) all decisions regarding interventions are individualized to the specific student and 5) the integrity of the implementation of tactics is closely monitored. Interventions in an RTI model are multi-tiered, with students who are not responding to intervention moving to a more rigorous or simply different tier of intervention. Our decision analysis protocol, described later in this paper, was designed to analyze learning problems within the context of the instructional setting and, in response, implement appropriate tactics based on where the learning problem existed (e.g., lack of prerequisite skills; motivation, instructional history, conditioned reinforcement). In summary, the CABAS[R] model of education employs a science of pedagogy to all aspects of teaching and learning. …