口译训练中的学习风格、动机与认知灵活性:自我选择与能力倾向

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Interpreting Pub Date : 2014-10-15 DOI:10.1075/INTP.13.1.03TIM
Sárka Timarová, Heidi Salaets
{"title":"口译训练中的学习风格、动机与认知灵活性:自我选择与能力倾向","authors":"Sárka Timarová, Heidi Salaets","doi":"10.1075/INTP.13.1.03TIM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Admission testing for conference interpreter training programmes traditionally focuses on skills directly related to the interpreting skills, and while soft skills, such as motivation, are recognised as important, they are not systematically tested or researched. The present study attempts to address this gap by exploring three traits and abilities, namely learning styles, motivation and cognitive flexibility, and to relate them to students’ self-selection for interpreting and to their success on final exams. Three tests were used to compare a group of self-selected interpreting students and applicants (n = 32) and a subgroup of conference interpreting students (n = 14) to a control group of undergraduate students (n = 104), from among whom the majority of Lessius University College interpreting students are recruited: the Inventory of Learning Styles (Vermunt & Rijswijk 1987), the Achievement Motivation Test (Hermans 1968/2004) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Grant & Berg 1948). The results show that self-selected interpreting students are cognitively more flexible and are less negatively affected by anxiety. Compared to the control group, successful conference interpreting students, but not unsuccessful students, are cognitively more flexible and benefit more from some level of anxiety. Moreover, all conference interpreting students are less affected by stress than the control group and seem to have more clearly developed learning preferences.","PeriodicalId":51746,"journal":{"name":"Interpreting","volume":"13 1","pages":"31-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/INTP.13.1.03TIM","citationCount":"74","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning styles, motivation and cognitive flexibility in interpreter training: self-selection and aptitude\",\"authors\":\"Sárka Timarová, Heidi Salaets\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/INTP.13.1.03TIM\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Admission testing for conference interpreter training programmes traditionally focuses on skills directly related to the interpreting skills, and while soft skills, such as motivation, are recognised as important, they are not systematically tested or researched. The present study attempts to address this gap by exploring three traits and abilities, namely learning styles, motivation and cognitive flexibility, and to relate them to students’ self-selection for interpreting and to their success on final exams. Three tests were used to compare a group of self-selected interpreting students and applicants (n = 32) and a subgroup of conference interpreting students (n = 14) to a control group of undergraduate students (n = 104), from among whom the majority of Lessius University College interpreting students are recruited: the Inventory of Learning Styles (Vermunt & Rijswijk 1987), the Achievement Motivation Test (Hermans 1968/2004) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Grant & Berg 1948). The results show that self-selected interpreting students are cognitively more flexible and are less negatively affected by anxiety. Compared to the control group, successful conference interpreting students, but not unsuccessful students, are cognitively more flexible and benefit more from some level of anxiety. Moreover, all conference interpreting students are less affected by stress than the control group and seem to have more clearly developed learning preferences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interpreting\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"31-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/INTP.13.1.03TIM\",\"citationCount\":\"74\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interpreting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/INTP.13.1.03TIM\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpreting","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/INTP.13.1.03TIM","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74

摘要

会议口译培训课程的入学考试传统上侧重于与口译技能直接相关的技能,而软技能,如动机,被认为是重要的,它们没有系统地测试或研究。本研究试图通过探索学习风格、动机和认知灵活性这三种特征和能力来解决这一差距,并将它们与学生的口译自我选择和期末考试的成功联系起来。三个测试被用来比较一组自我选择的口译学生和申请人(n = 32)和一个会议口译学生小组(n = 14)与一组本科生(n = 104),其中大多数莱西斯大学学院的口译学生被招募:学习风格量表(Vermunt & Rijswijk 1987),成就动机测试(Hermans 1968/2004)和威斯康星卡片分类测试(Grant & Berg 1948)。结果表明,自选口译学生的认知灵活性更高,受焦虑的负面影响更小。与对照组相比,成功的会议口译学生,而不是不成功的学生,在认知上更灵活,从某种程度的焦虑中获益更多。此外,所有会议口译学生受压力的影响都比对照组小,并且似乎有更明确的学习偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning styles, motivation and cognitive flexibility in interpreter training: self-selection and aptitude
Admission testing for conference interpreter training programmes traditionally focuses on skills directly related to the interpreting skills, and while soft skills, such as motivation, are recognised as important, they are not systematically tested or researched. The present study attempts to address this gap by exploring three traits and abilities, namely learning styles, motivation and cognitive flexibility, and to relate them to students’ self-selection for interpreting and to their success on final exams. Three tests were used to compare a group of self-selected interpreting students and applicants (n = 32) and a subgroup of conference interpreting students (n = 14) to a control group of undergraduate students (n = 104), from among whom the majority of Lessius University College interpreting students are recruited: the Inventory of Learning Styles (Vermunt & Rijswijk 1987), the Achievement Motivation Test (Hermans 1968/2004) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Grant & Berg 1948). The results show that self-selected interpreting students are cognitively more flexible and are less negatively affected by anxiety. Compared to the control group, successful conference interpreting students, but not unsuccessful students, are cognitively more flexible and benefit more from some level of anxiety. Moreover, all conference interpreting students are less affected by stress than the control group and seem to have more clearly developed learning preferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interpreting
Interpreting Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Interpreting serves as a medium for research and debate on all aspects of interpreting, in its various modes, modalities (spoken and signed) and settings (conferences, media, courtroom, healthcare and others). Striving to promote our understanding of the socio-cultural, cognitive and linguistic dimensions of interpreting as an activity and process, the journal covers theoretical and methodological concerns, explores the history and professional ecology of interpreting and its role in society, and addresses current issues in professional practice and training.
期刊最新文献
Language and power Review of Gavioli & Wadensjö (2023): The Routledge handbook of public service interpreting Coordination in telephone-based remote interpreting Explicitation and cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting How much noise can you make through an interpreter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1