皇家马斯基林天文学家

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY MARINERS MIRROR Pub Date : 2015-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00253359.2015.1025513
Nicolàs de Hilster
{"title":"皇家马斯基林天文学家","authors":"Nicolàs de Hilster","doi":"10.1080/00253359.2015.1025513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"its approach ‘from below’, that is beginning with the basic tactical features of the galley, showing how relatively simple procedures, systems and conventions determined the approach to warfare. The chapter on the life and training of the galley oarsmen (the Chusma) stresses that the skills and endurance of the rowers were the key to the success of a fleet. The author estimates a mortality rate of 50 per cent for oarsmen in the various squadrons of the Spanish fleet. While it could be useful and expected to compare this figure with the Ottomans, the author makes a strange and totally out-of-context comparison with the Soviet Gulag. The author takes issue with Fernand Braudel’s argument about the shift of the two major powers to the Atlantic after 1580. Instead he very plausibly argues that major campaigns in the inland sea came to a halt after 1574 precisely because of armed deterrence and not abandonment. This might be considered another significant contribution to the historiography of the subject. Surprisingly the author makes no references to new studies by Turkish historians in English, such as Emrah Safa Gürkan’s MA and PhD theses, covering Ottoman corsairs, espionage and secret diplomacy in the sixteenth century Mediterranean in the context of the Ottoman Habsburg rivalry. Gürkan has argued that the Ottoman corsairs formed a network between Constantinople and provincial port cities and constituted a faction (‘the Mediterranean faction’) which vied for power in the Ottoman capital, participating in court rivalries and shaping the formation of Ottoman strategy. Except for a limited time, the Habsburgs and the Ottomans at that time did not have permanent embassies in each other. However, diplomacy was conducted through go-betweens and Gürkan’s PhD thesis shows a high level of cooperation between the two imperial elites. These spies and agents however, as argued by Gürkan, could manipulate their governments and pursue their self-interest to such a degree that made them another actor of the historical scene. While Philip II and Suleiman the Magnificent posed themselves as defenders of Catholicism and of Islam respectively, most historians would attribute more importance to economic factors in their actions. Turkish historiography until recently upheld the paradigm of holy war (ghaza), but newer studies have changed this view. Williams follows this argument, suggesting that the activities of the corsairs of Algiers (el corso) were often the actions of the desperate and is perhaps best understood as a consequence of overpopulation and poverty than as the manifestation of any religious sentiment. The relations between the Catholic monarchy and the Christian privateers were also ambiguous. On the nature of holy war in the Mediterranean the author accepts neither the ‘messianic imperialism’ thesis, nor Braudel’s view of the determining cycles of economic development, but concludes that holy war was the result of ‘royal feudalism’ or the initial pledge of Philip II to the pope to fight for the ‘cause of God’ against heretics and Saracens, although the limits of this pledge were not clear. Thus the author’s conclusion is not very decisive on this point. Despite this and other minor deficiencies, the book is useful for undergraduate and graduate students of the Mediterranean. The book would have been enriched with a map of the Mediterranean, however. candan badem tunceli university, turKey http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2014.1025512 © Candan Badem","PeriodicalId":44123,"journal":{"name":"MARINERS MIRROR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00253359.2015.1025513","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maskelyne Astronomer Royal\",\"authors\":\"Nicolàs de Hilster\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00253359.2015.1025513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"its approach ‘from below’, that is beginning with the basic tactical features of the galley, showing how relatively simple procedures, systems and conventions determined the approach to warfare. The chapter on the life and training of the galley oarsmen (the Chusma) stresses that the skills and endurance of the rowers were the key to the success of a fleet. The author estimates a mortality rate of 50 per cent for oarsmen in the various squadrons of the Spanish fleet. While it could be useful and expected to compare this figure with the Ottomans, the author makes a strange and totally out-of-context comparison with the Soviet Gulag. The author takes issue with Fernand Braudel’s argument about the shift of the two major powers to the Atlantic after 1580. Instead he very plausibly argues that major campaigns in the inland sea came to a halt after 1574 precisely because of armed deterrence and not abandonment. This might be considered another significant contribution to the historiography of the subject. Surprisingly the author makes no references to new studies by Turkish historians in English, such as Emrah Safa Gürkan’s MA and PhD theses, covering Ottoman corsairs, espionage and secret diplomacy in the sixteenth century Mediterranean in the context of the Ottoman Habsburg rivalry. Gürkan has argued that the Ottoman corsairs formed a network between Constantinople and provincial port cities and constituted a faction (‘the Mediterranean faction’) which vied for power in the Ottoman capital, participating in court rivalries and shaping the formation of Ottoman strategy. Except for a limited time, the Habsburgs and the Ottomans at that time did not have permanent embassies in each other. However, diplomacy was conducted through go-betweens and Gürkan’s PhD thesis shows a high level of cooperation between the two imperial elites. These spies and agents however, as argued by Gürkan, could manipulate their governments and pursue their self-interest to such a degree that made them another actor of the historical scene. While Philip II and Suleiman the Magnificent posed themselves as defenders of Catholicism and of Islam respectively, most historians would attribute more importance to economic factors in their actions. Turkish historiography until recently upheld the paradigm of holy war (ghaza), but newer studies have changed this view. Williams follows this argument, suggesting that the activities of the corsairs of Algiers (el corso) were often the actions of the desperate and is perhaps best understood as a consequence of overpopulation and poverty than as the manifestation of any religious sentiment. The relations between the Catholic monarchy and the Christian privateers were also ambiguous. On the nature of holy war in the Mediterranean the author accepts neither the ‘messianic imperialism’ thesis, nor Braudel’s view of the determining cycles of economic development, but concludes that holy war was the result of ‘royal feudalism’ or the initial pledge of Philip II to the pope to fight for the ‘cause of God’ against heretics and Saracens, although the limits of this pledge were not clear. Thus the author’s conclusion is not very decisive on this point. Despite this and other minor deficiencies, the book is useful for undergraduate and graduate students of the Mediterranean. The book would have been enriched with a map of the Mediterranean, however. candan badem tunceli university, turKey http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2014.1025512 © Candan Badem\",\"PeriodicalId\":44123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MARINERS MIRROR\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00253359.2015.1025513\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MARINERS MIRROR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2015.1025513\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARINERS MIRROR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2015.1025513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

它的方法是“自下而上”的,从厨房的基本战术特征开始,展示了相对简单的程序,系统和惯例如何决定了战争的方法。关于帆船桨手(Chusma)的生活和训练的章节强调,桨手的技能和耐力是船队成功的关键。提交人估计,西班牙舰队各中队桨手的死亡率为50%。虽然将这一数字与奥斯曼人进行比较可能是有用的,而且是意料之中的,但作者与苏联古拉格进行了一个奇怪的、完全脱离背景的比较。作者对布罗代尔关于1580年后两个大国向大西洋转移的论点提出了异议。相反,他非常有说服力地认为,1574年后,内海的主要战役停止,正是因为武装威慑,而不是放弃。这可能被认为是对该主题的史学的另一个重要贡献。令人惊讶的是,作者没有提到土耳其历史学家用英语进行的新研究,比如Emrah Safa g rkan的硕士和博士论文,这些论文涉及16世纪奥斯曼海盗、间谍和秘密外交,背景是奥斯曼哈布斯堡王朝的竞争。g rkan认为,奥斯曼海盗在君士坦丁堡和各省港口城市之间形成了一个网络,并构成了一个派系(“地中海派系”),他们在奥斯曼首都争夺权力,参与宫廷竞争,塑造了奥斯曼战略的形成。除了一段有限的时间外,哈布斯堡王朝和奥斯曼帝国当时没有相互设立常驻大使馆。然而,外交是通过中间人进行的,g rkan的博士论文显示了两个帝国精英之间的高度合作。然而,正如g rkan所说,这些间谍和特工可以操纵他们的政府,追求自己的利益,以至于使他们成为历史舞台上的另一个演员。虽然菲利普二世和苏莱曼大帝分别以天主教和伊斯兰教的捍卫者自居,但大多数历史学家认为他们的行为更重要的是经济因素。直到最近,土耳其的史学还坚持圣战(ghaza)的范式,但较新的研究改变了这种观点。威廉姆斯遵循这一论点,认为阿尔及尔海盗(el corso)的行为往往是绝望的行为,也许最好理解为人口过剩和贫困的后果,而不是任何宗教情绪的表现。天主教君主制和基督教私掠者之间的关系也很暧昧。关于地中海圣战的本质,作者既不接受“弥赛亚帝国主义”的论点,也不接受布罗代尔关于经济发展决定周期的观点,但得出的结论是,圣战是“皇家封建主义”的结果,或者是菲利普二世对教皇的最初承诺,即为“上帝的事业”而战,反对异教徒和撒拉逊人,尽管这种承诺的界限并不清楚。因此,作者的结论在这一点上不是很有决定性。尽管有这样或那样的不足,这本书对研究地中海的本科生和研究生还是很有用的。然而,这本书本可以用地中海地图来丰富内容。加拿大巴登通切利大学,土耳其http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2014.1025512©加拿大巴登
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maskelyne Astronomer Royal
its approach ‘from below’, that is beginning with the basic tactical features of the galley, showing how relatively simple procedures, systems and conventions determined the approach to warfare. The chapter on the life and training of the galley oarsmen (the Chusma) stresses that the skills and endurance of the rowers were the key to the success of a fleet. The author estimates a mortality rate of 50 per cent for oarsmen in the various squadrons of the Spanish fleet. While it could be useful and expected to compare this figure with the Ottomans, the author makes a strange and totally out-of-context comparison with the Soviet Gulag. The author takes issue with Fernand Braudel’s argument about the shift of the two major powers to the Atlantic after 1580. Instead he very plausibly argues that major campaigns in the inland sea came to a halt after 1574 precisely because of armed deterrence and not abandonment. This might be considered another significant contribution to the historiography of the subject. Surprisingly the author makes no references to new studies by Turkish historians in English, such as Emrah Safa Gürkan’s MA and PhD theses, covering Ottoman corsairs, espionage and secret diplomacy in the sixteenth century Mediterranean in the context of the Ottoman Habsburg rivalry. Gürkan has argued that the Ottoman corsairs formed a network between Constantinople and provincial port cities and constituted a faction (‘the Mediterranean faction’) which vied for power in the Ottoman capital, participating in court rivalries and shaping the formation of Ottoman strategy. Except for a limited time, the Habsburgs and the Ottomans at that time did not have permanent embassies in each other. However, diplomacy was conducted through go-betweens and Gürkan’s PhD thesis shows a high level of cooperation between the two imperial elites. These spies and agents however, as argued by Gürkan, could manipulate their governments and pursue their self-interest to such a degree that made them another actor of the historical scene. While Philip II and Suleiman the Magnificent posed themselves as defenders of Catholicism and of Islam respectively, most historians would attribute more importance to economic factors in their actions. Turkish historiography until recently upheld the paradigm of holy war (ghaza), but newer studies have changed this view. Williams follows this argument, suggesting that the activities of the corsairs of Algiers (el corso) were often the actions of the desperate and is perhaps best understood as a consequence of overpopulation and poverty than as the manifestation of any religious sentiment. The relations between the Catholic monarchy and the Christian privateers were also ambiguous. On the nature of holy war in the Mediterranean the author accepts neither the ‘messianic imperialism’ thesis, nor Braudel’s view of the determining cycles of economic development, but concludes that holy war was the result of ‘royal feudalism’ or the initial pledge of Philip II to the pope to fight for the ‘cause of God’ against heretics and Saracens, although the limits of this pledge were not clear. Thus the author’s conclusion is not very decisive on this point. Despite this and other minor deficiencies, the book is useful for undergraduate and graduate students of the Mediterranean. The book would have been enriched with a map of the Mediterranean, however. candan badem tunceli university, turKey http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2014.1025512 © Candan Badem
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MARINERS MIRROR
MARINERS MIRROR HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The Society’s quarterly journal, The Mariner"s Mirror, is internationally recognised as the pre-eminent English-language journal on naval and maritime history, nautical archaeology and all aspects of seafaring and lore of the sea. It covers a wide range of history, from Bronze Age ships to nuclear submarines, and nautical matters such as hydography, navigation and naval logistics. The Mariner’s Mirror has an extensive book review section. Its notes and queries sections and correspondence pages provide a channel for a lively exchange between members.
期刊最新文献
The Petrol Navy: British, American and other motor boats at war 1914–1920 The Petrol Navy: British, American and other motor boats at war 1914–1920 , by S. R. Dunn, Seaforth Publishing, 2023, £25 (hb), 320 pages, illustrations, ISBN 9781399062855 The Myth of HMS Minden and ‘The Star-Spangled Banner’: Where did it originate? A Jacobean Draught of an 18-gun Ship in the Danish National Archives Drawn by Phineas Pett Under Five Flags: Miguirditch Gumuchdjian, an Armenian shipowner of Constantinople and London 1900–1932 Documents Relating to the Official Dutch Naval Visit to Cherbourg, 8–10 September 1786
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1