新闻作为商业:全球金融危机和华尔街日报的占领运动

Aziz Douai, T. Wu
{"title":"新闻作为商业:全球金融危机和华尔街日报的占领运动","authors":"Aziz Douai, T. Wu","doi":"10.1080/13216597.2014.948033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines a leading US business newspaper's coverage of the global financial crisis (GFC) and Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the most influential international business newspaper with a global audience, is used as a case study. Although the GFC and OWS are closely related, we found significant differences in the way that they were reported in business news. Specifically, we found divergent frames in the WSJ's coverage: an ‘institutional’ framing of the GFC starkly differs from a ‘hegemonic’ framing of OWS. We relate this framing divergence to (1) the instability and inconsistencies in journalism's ‘occupational ideology’ and (2) the challenges social movements encounter in influencing public discourse.","PeriodicalId":16118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Communication","volume":"20 1","pages":"148 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13216597.2014.948033","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"News as business: the global financial crisis and Occupy movement in the Wall Street Journal\",\"authors\":\"Aziz Douai, T. Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13216597.2014.948033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article examines a leading US business newspaper's coverage of the global financial crisis (GFC) and Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the most influential international business newspaper with a global audience, is used as a case study. Although the GFC and OWS are closely related, we found significant differences in the way that they were reported in business news. Specifically, we found divergent frames in the WSJ's coverage: an ‘institutional’ framing of the GFC starkly differs from a ‘hegemonic’ framing of OWS. We relate this framing divergence to (1) the instability and inconsistencies in journalism's ‘occupational ideology’ and (2) the challenges social movements encounter in influencing public discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Communication\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13216597.2014.948033\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2014.948033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2014.948033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文考察了美国一家主要商业报纸对全球金融危机(GFC)和占领华尔街(OWS)运动的报道。《华尔街日报》(WSJ)是最具影响力的国际商业报纸,拥有全球受众。尽管全球金融危机和占领华尔街运动密切相关,但我们发现商业新闻报道它们的方式存在显著差异。具体来说,我们在《华尔街日报》的报道中发现了不同的框架:全球金融危机的“制度性”框架与占领华尔街运动的“霸权性”框架截然不同。我们将这种框架分歧与(1)新闻业“职业意识形态”的不稳定性和不一致性以及(2)社会运动在影响公共话语时遇到的挑战联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
News as business: the global financial crisis and Occupy movement in the Wall Street Journal
Abstract This article examines a leading US business newspaper's coverage of the global financial crisis (GFC) and Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the most influential international business newspaper with a global audience, is used as a case study. Although the GFC and OWS are closely related, we found significant differences in the way that they were reported in business news. Specifically, we found divergent frames in the WSJ's coverage: an ‘institutional’ framing of the GFC starkly differs from a ‘hegemonic’ framing of OWS. We relate this framing divergence to (1) the instability and inconsistencies in journalism's ‘occupational ideology’ and (2) the challenges social movements encounter in influencing public discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Communication
Journal of International Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: International Communication is an established field of study taught widely around the world under a variety of names. Journal of International Communication (JIC) is a refereed journal the field of international communication calls its own and one that provides a forum for discussion for the various geo-academic approaches to the study of global communication. A variety of fields of study, including International Communication, International Relations, International Development, International Political Economy, Global Sociology, Media Anthropology, Media and Cultural Studies, and Post-colonial Studies nourish JIC .
期刊最新文献
How mainstream Iranian newspapers portray the West: the influence of anti-Westernism and anti-Americanism Cyber security in developing countries, a digital divide issue ‘Reversed agenda-setting effects’ in China Case studies of Weibo trending topics and the effects on state-owned media in China Apres Le Deluge: social media in learning and teaching News as business: the global financial crisis and Occupy movement in the Wall Street Journal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1