天主教神父对教区居民寻求帮助行为的看法

M. Kane
{"title":"天主教神父对教区居民寻求帮助行为的看法","authors":"M. Kane","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Randomly sampled Catholic priests functioning in parishes throughout the United States were surveyed to determine who they believed should assist people in 13 moral, emotional, familial, and personal problem‐situations. To each problem situation, respondents were asked to choose one of the following four options: (1) a priest; (2) a priest with advanced mental health training in clinical social work, counseling, psychology or psychiatry; (3) a lay mental health professional; or (4) these specific situations should be handled by the person alone and without skilled help. The findings indicate that priest‐respondents believed that moral problems such as marrying a non‐Catholic (92.0%) and conflict over birth control (78.9%) should be handled by priests, whereas severe emotional problems (74.9%), spousal abuse (62.8%), personal alcohol abuse (59.3%), abnormal grief reactions (54.8%), and teenagers using drugs (52.3%) should be referred to lay professionals. “Hearing the voice of God” and “seeing Jesus” were situations perceived to be within the competence of priests, especially those with advanced clinical training. Years of pastoral experience and advanced clinical training seem to have an effect on few of these decisions. Implications for social work are discussed, particularly in light of policy initiatives for faith‐based service provision.","PeriodicalId":82727,"journal":{"name":"Social thought","volume":"22 1","pages":"159 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960332","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of catholic priests toward help‐seeking behavior of parishioners\",\"authors\":\"M. Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Randomly sampled Catholic priests functioning in parishes throughout the United States were surveyed to determine who they believed should assist people in 13 moral, emotional, familial, and personal problem‐situations. To each problem situation, respondents were asked to choose one of the following four options: (1) a priest; (2) a priest with advanced mental health training in clinical social work, counseling, psychology or psychiatry; (3) a lay mental health professional; or (4) these specific situations should be handled by the person alone and without skilled help. The findings indicate that priest‐respondents believed that moral problems such as marrying a non‐Catholic (92.0%) and conflict over birth control (78.9%) should be handled by priests, whereas severe emotional problems (74.9%), spousal abuse (62.8%), personal alcohol abuse (59.3%), abnormal grief reactions (54.8%), and teenagers using drugs (52.3%) should be referred to lay professionals. “Hearing the voice of God” and “seeing Jesus” were situations perceived to be within the competence of priests, especially those with advanced clinical training. Years of pastoral experience and advanced clinical training seem to have an effect on few of these decisions. Implications for social work are discussed, particularly in light of policy initiatives for faith‐based service provision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social thought\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960332\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

摘要:本研究对美国各地随机抽取的天主教神父进行了调查,以确定他们认为谁应该在13种道德、情感、家庭和个人问题情境中帮助人们。针对每个问题情况,受访者被要求从以下四个选项中选择一个:(1)牧师;(2)曾在临床社会工作、辅导、心理学或精神病学方面接受高级精神健康训练的神父;(3)外行心理卫生专业人员;或者(4)这些具体情况应由该人单独处理,而不需要技术人员的帮助。调查结果显示,牧师受访者认为道德问题,如与非天主教徒结婚(92.0%)和节育冲突(78.9%)应由牧师处理,而严重的情感问题(74.9%)、配偶虐待(62.8%)、个人酗酒(59.3%)、异常悲伤反应(54.8%)和青少年吸毒(52.3%)应交由非专业人士处理。“听到上帝的声音”和“看到耶稣”被认为是牧师的能力范围,特别是那些受过高级临床训练的牧师。多年的牧师经验和高级临床培训似乎对这些决定几乎没有影响。讨论了对社会工作的影响,特别是根据基于信仰的服务提供的政策倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions of catholic priests toward help‐seeking behavior of parishioners
Abstract Randomly sampled Catholic priests functioning in parishes throughout the United States were surveyed to determine who they believed should assist people in 13 moral, emotional, familial, and personal problem‐situations. To each problem situation, respondents were asked to choose one of the following four options: (1) a priest; (2) a priest with advanced mental health training in clinical social work, counseling, psychology or psychiatry; (3) a lay mental health professional; or (4) these specific situations should be handled by the person alone and without skilled help. The findings indicate that priest‐respondents believed that moral problems such as marrying a non‐Catholic (92.0%) and conflict over birth control (78.9%) should be handled by priests, whereas severe emotional problems (74.9%), spousal abuse (62.8%), personal alcohol abuse (59.3%), abnormal grief reactions (54.8%), and teenagers using drugs (52.3%) should be referred to lay professionals. “Hearing the voice of God” and “seeing Jesus” were situations perceived to be within the competence of priests, especially those with advanced clinical training. Years of pastoral experience and advanced clinical training seem to have an effect on few of these decisions. Implications for social work are discussed, particularly in light of policy initiatives for faith‐based service provision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The promise of faith‐based social services: Perception versus reality More harm than good? Multicultural initiatives in human service agencies Race, religion, altruism, and the transracial adoption debate: A survey of Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish social workers Being called: Women's paths to service and activism Spirituality and social work: A Norwegian reflection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1