谁的正义?九种司法模式的检验

Patrick T. McCormick
{"title":"谁的正义?九种司法模式的检验","authors":"Patrick T. McCormick","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Formal definitions of justice calling us to “render the other their due” are elastic, given shape by our grasp of the moral bonds connecting persons and the relationship between this virtue and other moral habits, affections, or the concrete experience of our lives. This paper, written for a conference on education to justice in Jesuit Universities, examines nine theories of justice (Utilitarianism, Libertarianism, Social Contract, Complex Equality, a Feminist Ethics of Care, Christian Realism, Catholic Social Thought, Liberation Theology, and a Biblical notion of justice) in light of their perspective on the rights and duties persons have to one another and the relationship of justice to compassion and the affections.","PeriodicalId":82727,"journal":{"name":"Social thought","volume":"22 1","pages":"25 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960338","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose justice? An examination of nine models of justice\",\"authors\":\"Patrick T. McCormick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15426432.2003.9960338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Formal definitions of justice calling us to “render the other their due” are elastic, given shape by our grasp of the moral bonds connecting persons and the relationship between this virtue and other moral habits, affections, or the concrete experience of our lives. This paper, written for a conference on education to justice in Jesuit Universities, examines nine theories of justice (Utilitarianism, Libertarianism, Social Contract, Complex Equality, a Feminist Ethics of Care, Christian Realism, Catholic Social Thought, Liberation Theology, and a Biblical notion of justice) in light of their perspective on the rights and duties persons have to one another and the relationship of justice to compassion and the affections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social thought\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"25 - 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960338\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2003.9960338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

要求我们“给予他人应得”的正义的正式定义是有弹性的,它是由我们对人与人之间的道德纽带以及这种美德与其他道德习惯、情感或我们生活中的具体经验之间的关系的把握而形成的。这篇论文是为耶稣会大学的正义教育会议而写的,考察了九种正义理论(功利主义、自由主义、社会契约、复杂平等、女性主义关怀伦理、基督教现实主义、天主教社会思想、解放神学和圣经正义概念),根据它们对人对彼此的权利和义务以及正义与同情和情感的关系的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whose justice? An examination of nine models of justice
Summary Formal definitions of justice calling us to “render the other their due” are elastic, given shape by our grasp of the moral bonds connecting persons and the relationship between this virtue and other moral habits, affections, or the concrete experience of our lives. This paper, written for a conference on education to justice in Jesuit Universities, examines nine theories of justice (Utilitarianism, Libertarianism, Social Contract, Complex Equality, a Feminist Ethics of Care, Christian Realism, Catholic Social Thought, Liberation Theology, and a Biblical notion of justice) in light of their perspective on the rights and duties persons have to one another and the relationship of justice to compassion and the affections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The promise of faith‐based social services: Perception versus reality More harm than good? Multicultural initiatives in human service agencies Race, religion, altruism, and the transracial adoption debate: A survey of Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish social workers Being called: Women's paths to service and activism Spirituality and social work: A Norwegian reflection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1