全球穆斯林对伊斯兰的声音——民主兼容与共存:萨德克·苏莱曼、路易·萨菲、拉德万·马斯莫迪和穆克泰达尔·汗观点研究

Tauseef Ahmad Parray
{"title":"全球穆斯林对伊斯兰的声音——民主兼容与共存:萨德克·苏莱曼、路易·萨菲、拉德万·马斯莫迪和穆克泰达尔·汗观点研究","authors":"Tauseef Ahmad Parray","doi":"10.1080/19370679.2012.12023198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Islam-democracy compatibility or Islamic democratic discourse – the relation between Islamic socio-political concepts and institutions and positive features and notions of modern democracy – has gained an impetus from the final decades of 20th century. Democracy in Islam is strongly debated, defined and discussed by the diversity of voices ranging from those who deny a connection between Islam and democracy to those who argue that the Islamic system of government contains a number of ‘concepts and values’ which are present in modern democracy. In this direction, this paper attempts to make an analysis of the views, arguments and observations of four most prominent modernist Muslim intellectuals – ‘Muslim Democrats’ – regarding Islam-democracy compatibility and co-existence. The views of scholars presented here include: Sadek Jawad Sulaiman, Louay M. Safi, Radwan A. Masmoudi, and M.A. Muqtedar Khan. It argues (among others) that more reflection, research, and (re) interpretation is required to reconcile the tenets of Islam with the modern notions of democracy, liberty, justice, equality, and human rights as the Islamic primary sources throw ample light and guidance on these concepts and values.","PeriodicalId":63464,"journal":{"name":"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19370679.2012.12023198","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Muslim Voices on Islam – Democracy Compatibility and Co-existence: A Study of the Views of Sadek Sulaiman, Louay Safi, Radwan Masmoudi, and Muqtedar Khan\",\"authors\":\"Tauseef Ahmad Parray\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19370679.2012.12023198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Islam-democracy compatibility or Islamic democratic discourse – the relation between Islamic socio-political concepts and institutions and positive features and notions of modern democracy – has gained an impetus from the final decades of 20th century. Democracy in Islam is strongly debated, defined and discussed by the diversity of voices ranging from those who deny a connection between Islam and democracy to those who argue that the Islamic system of government contains a number of ‘concepts and values’ which are present in modern democracy. In this direction, this paper attempts to make an analysis of the views, arguments and observations of four most prominent modernist Muslim intellectuals – ‘Muslim Democrats’ – regarding Islam-democracy compatibility and co-existence. The views of scholars presented here include: Sadek Jawad Sulaiman, Louay M. Safi, Radwan A. Masmoudi, and M.A. Muqtedar Khan. It argues (among others) that more reflection, research, and (re) interpretation is required to reconcile the tenets of Islam with the modern notions of democracy, liberty, justice, equality, and human rights as the Islamic primary sources throw ample light and guidance on these concepts and values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":63464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19370679.2012.12023198\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2012.12023198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2012.12023198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:伊斯兰-民主兼容或伊斯兰民主话语——伊斯兰社会政治概念和制度与现代民主的积极特征和概念之间的关系——在20世纪最后几十年得到了推动。伊斯兰教的民主受到各种声音的激烈争论、定义和讨论,从那些否认伊斯兰教与民主之间存在联系的人到那些认为伊斯兰政府体系包含许多现代民主中存在的“概念和价值观”的人。在这个方向上,本文试图分析四位最杰出的现代穆斯林知识分子——“穆斯林民主主义者”——关于伊斯兰-民主兼容与共存的观点、论点和观察。这里介绍的学者的观点包括:Sadek Jawad Sulaiman, Louay M. Safi, Radwan A. Masmoudi和ma . Muqtedar Khan。它认为(除其他外)需要更多的反思、研究和(重新)解释,以使伊斯兰教的信条与民主、自由、正义、平等和人权的现代概念相协调,因为伊斯兰教的主要来源为这些概念和价值观提供了充足的光明和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global Muslim Voices on Islam – Democracy Compatibility and Co-existence: A Study of the Views of Sadek Sulaiman, Louay Safi, Radwan Masmoudi, and Muqtedar Khan
Abstract: Islam-democracy compatibility or Islamic democratic discourse – the relation between Islamic socio-political concepts and institutions and positive features and notions of modern democracy – has gained an impetus from the final decades of 20th century. Democracy in Islam is strongly debated, defined and discussed by the diversity of voices ranging from those who deny a connection between Islam and democracy to those who argue that the Islamic system of government contains a number of ‘concepts and values’ which are present in modern democracy. In this direction, this paper attempts to make an analysis of the views, arguments and observations of four most prominent modernist Muslim intellectuals – ‘Muslim Democrats’ – regarding Islam-democracy compatibility and co-existence. The views of scholars presented here include: Sadek Jawad Sulaiman, Louay M. Safi, Radwan A. Masmoudi, and M.A. Muqtedar Khan. It argues (among others) that more reflection, research, and (re) interpretation is required to reconcile the tenets of Islam with the modern notions of democracy, liberty, justice, equality, and human rights as the Islamic primary sources throw ample light and guidance on these concepts and values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Effectiveness of the Carrot and Stick Counter-terrorist Measure: A Comparison of Algeria and Yemen “Islamic State” and the Transformation of Islamic Discourse in the Middle East A Preliminary Study on the “Islamic State” Thought in Modern Islamism Hajj and Its Impact on International Relations Root of Religious Extremist Thought and Sino-Arab Cooperation on Deradicalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1