从旁观者到建设者:中国与中东安全治理

Degang Sun, S. He
{"title":"从旁观者到建设者:中国与中东安全治理","authors":"Degang Sun, S. He","doi":"10.1080/19370679.2015.12023266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In the 21st century, Middle East conflicts can generally be classified into four types, namely, conflicts between outside powers and Middle East countries, between Middle East countries themselves, between different political parties and religious sects within a sovereign country, as well as transnational and cross-bordering conflicts. The mode of China’s participation in Middle East security governance includes the political, security and social conflicts. There are three categories of domestic mechanisms in Chinese practice, specifically, the special envoy mechanism by Chinese Foreign Ministry, the procession and peace-keeping mechanisms by Chinese Defense Ministry and the foreign aid mechanism by Chinese Ministry of Commerce. The China-Arab States Cooperation Forum, the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, the UN and other international organizations constitute the major international regimes for China’s security governance. China’s Middle East security governance creates not only “public goods” for the region, but also a means for China to build constructive great power relations with the US, EU and Russia, among others. The styles of Chinese and Western security governance in the Middle East vary, and the Chinese side places more emphasis on improving the Middle East people’s well-being at the top of the agenda, following “up-bottom” roadmap, and seeking an incremental, consultative, inclusive, and selective governance in the Middle East conflict resolution.","PeriodicalId":63464,"journal":{"name":"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19370679.2015.12023266","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From A By-stander to A Constructor: China and the Middle East Security Governance\",\"authors\":\"Degang Sun, S. He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19370679.2015.12023266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: In the 21st century, Middle East conflicts can generally be classified into four types, namely, conflicts between outside powers and Middle East countries, between Middle East countries themselves, between different political parties and religious sects within a sovereign country, as well as transnational and cross-bordering conflicts. The mode of China’s participation in Middle East security governance includes the political, security and social conflicts. There are three categories of domestic mechanisms in Chinese practice, specifically, the special envoy mechanism by Chinese Foreign Ministry, the procession and peace-keeping mechanisms by Chinese Defense Ministry and the foreign aid mechanism by Chinese Ministry of Commerce. The China-Arab States Cooperation Forum, the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, the UN and other international organizations constitute the major international regimes for China’s security governance. China’s Middle East security governance creates not only “public goods” for the region, but also a means for China to build constructive great power relations with the US, EU and Russia, among others. The styles of Chinese and Western security governance in the Middle East vary, and the Chinese side places more emphasis on improving the Middle East people’s well-being at the top of the agenda, following “up-bottom” roadmap, and seeking an incremental, consultative, inclusive, and selective governance in the Middle East conflict resolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":63464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19370679.2015.12023266\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2015.12023266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2015.12023266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

[摘要]21世纪中东地区的冲突大致可以分为四种类型,即外部大国与中东国家之间的冲突、中东国家之间的冲突、主权国家内部不同政党和宗教派别之间的冲突以及跨国和跨国界的冲突。中国参与中东安全治理的模式包括政治冲突、安全冲突和社会冲突。中国实践中的国内机制主要有三类,分别是外交部的特使机制、国防部的游行与维和机制和商务部的对外援助机制。中阿合作论坛、中非合作论坛和联合国等国际组织是中国安全治理的主要国际机制。中国的中东安全治理不仅为该地区创造了“公共产品”,也是中国与美国、欧盟、俄罗斯等国建立建设性大国关系的一种手段。中西方中东安全治理风格不同,中方更强调将改善中东民生置于优先位置,遵循“自下而上”的路线图,在中东冲突解决中寻求渐进式、协商式、包容性、选择性治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From A By-stander to A Constructor: China and the Middle East Security Governance
Abstract: In the 21st century, Middle East conflicts can generally be classified into four types, namely, conflicts between outside powers and Middle East countries, between Middle East countries themselves, between different political parties and religious sects within a sovereign country, as well as transnational and cross-bordering conflicts. The mode of China’s participation in Middle East security governance includes the political, security and social conflicts. There are three categories of domestic mechanisms in Chinese practice, specifically, the special envoy mechanism by Chinese Foreign Ministry, the procession and peace-keeping mechanisms by Chinese Defense Ministry and the foreign aid mechanism by Chinese Ministry of Commerce. The China-Arab States Cooperation Forum, the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, the UN and other international organizations constitute the major international regimes for China’s security governance. China’s Middle East security governance creates not only “public goods” for the region, but also a means for China to build constructive great power relations with the US, EU and Russia, among others. The styles of Chinese and Western security governance in the Middle East vary, and the Chinese side places more emphasis on improving the Middle East people’s well-being at the top of the agenda, following “up-bottom” roadmap, and seeking an incremental, consultative, inclusive, and selective governance in the Middle East conflict resolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Effectiveness of the Carrot and Stick Counter-terrorist Measure: A Comparison of Algeria and Yemen “Islamic State” and the Transformation of Islamic Discourse in the Middle East A Preliminary Study on the “Islamic State” Thought in Modern Islamism Hajj and Its Impact on International Relations Root of Religious Extremist Thought and Sino-Arab Cooperation on Deradicalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1