行为主义原教旨主义转向激进:东伊运/伊斯兰激进主义运动的伊斯兰原教旨主义表现与叙事

Yee Lak Elliot Lee
{"title":"行为主义原教旨主义转向激进:东伊运/伊斯兰激进主义运动的伊斯兰原教旨主义表现与叙事","authors":"Yee Lak Elliot Lee","doi":"10.1080/19370679.2015.12023274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Many contemporary Islamic terrorist groups have been identified as forms of religious fundamentalism. Moreover, the narratives and representations constructed by many of these groups contain traces of religious fundamentalism. In this article, ETIM/TIP’s narratives and representations are examined as a case study. The group’s power discourses as they relate to religious fundamentalism are analyzed through examining the group’s rhetoric of its own origin, its current situation, and its reactions toward this situation. The power discourse of an unconventional “Orientalism” and the use of behaviorist logic are especially emphasized. Furthermore, the presence of behaviorism in religious fundamentalist narratives suggests the need for China to revise its official national counterterrorist discourse. Instead of continuing the current behaviorist rhetoric in the legal framework, this article suggests a deconstruction—ultimately, a discouragement—of religious behaviorism to prevent the radicalization of Muslims in the country.","PeriodicalId":63464,"journal":{"name":"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19370679.2015.12023274","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behaviorist Fundamentalism Turns Radical: ETIM/TIP’s Islamic Fundamentalist Representations and Narratives\",\"authors\":\"Yee Lak Elliot Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19370679.2015.12023274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Many contemporary Islamic terrorist groups have been identified as forms of religious fundamentalism. Moreover, the narratives and representations constructed by many of these groups contain traces of religious fundamentalism. In this article, ETIM/TIP’s narratives and representations are examined as a case study. The group’s power discourses as they relate to religious fundamentalism are analyzed through examining the group’s rhetoric of its own origin, its current situation, and its reactions toward this situation. The power discourse of an unconventional “Orientalism” and the use of behaviorist logic are especially emphasized. Furthermore, the presence of behaviorism in religious fundamentalist narratives suggests the need for China to revise its official national counterterrorist discourse. Instead of continuing the current behaviorist rhetoric in the legal framework, this article suggests a deconstruction—ultimately, a discouragement—of religious behaviorism to prevent the radicalization of Muslims in the country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":63464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19370679.2015.12023274\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2015.12023274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中东与伊斯兰研究(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2015.12023274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:当代许多伊斯兰恐怖组织被认定为宗教原教旨主义的形式。此外,这些团体中的许多人所建构的叙述和表现都含有宗教原教旨主义的痕迹。在这篇文章中,东伊运/TIP的叙述和表现作为一个案例进行了研究。该组织的权力话语,因为他们涉及到宗教原教旨主义是通过检查其自身的起源,其目前的情况,其对这种情况的反应小组的修辞分析。特别强调了非传统“东方主义”的权力话语和行为主义逻辑的运用。此外,宗教原教旨主义叙事中行为主义的存在表明,中国需要修改其官方的国家反恐话语。本文不是在法律框架中继续当前的行为主义修辞,而是建议对宗教行为主义进行解构——最终,是一种劝阻——以防止该国穆斯林的激进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behaviorist Fundamentalism Turns Radical: ETIM/TIP’s Islamic Fundamentalist Representations and Narratives
Abstract: Many contemporary Islamic terrorist groups have been identified as forms of religious fundamentalism. Moreover, the narratives and representations constructed by many of these groups contain traces of religious fundamentalism. In this article, ETIM/TIP’s narratives and representations are examined as a case study. The group’s power discourses as they relate to religious fundamentalism are analyzed through examining the group’s rhetoric of its own origin, its current situation, and its reactions toward this situation. The power discourse of an unconventional “Orientalism” and the use of behaviorist logic are especially emphasized. Furthermore, the presence of behaviorism in religious fundamentalist narratives suggests the need for China to revise its official national counterterrorist discourse. Instead of continuing the current behaviorist rhetoric in the legal framework, this article suggests a deconstruction—ultimately, a discouragement—of religious behaviorism to prevent the radicalization of Muslims in the country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Effectiveness of the Carrot and Stick Counter-terrorist Measure: A Comparison of Algeria and Yemen “Islamic State” and the Transformation of Islamic Discourse in the Middle East A Preliminary Study on the “Islamic State” Thought in Modern Islamism Hajj and Its Impact on International Relations Root of Religious Extremist Thought and Sino-Arab Cooperation on Deradicalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1