{"title":"语言习得和语言加工:寻找新的联系","authors":"J. Trueswell","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2023.2216689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two central questions addressed in psycholinguistics pertain to acquisition and process. First, how do children, exposed to a relatively small sample of language use in context, come to acquire a complete linguistic system that can express an almost limitless number of ideas? Second, how do adults access this acquired linguistic knowledge in such an expert manner that they achieve interpretation in real time as the signal unfolds, typically making distinctions on a millisecond timescale? Traditionally these two questions have been addressed separately, with the field taking a divide and conquer approach, often with great success. However, over the past three decades, the distinction between these questions, and their artificial divide in the discipline, have been blurred. Children as young as 24 months have been observed to interpret speech in real time, deploying their albeit incomplete linguistic knowledge almost as quickly as their adult expert counterparts (e.g., de Carvalho et al. 2016; Choi & Trueswell 2010, Lidz et al. 2017, Trueswell & Gleitman 2007). Likewise, adults have been observed to be highly adaptive, learning new patterns of speech, new terms, and new syntax from brief exposures (e.g., Caplan et al. 2021, Fine & Jaeger 2013, Norris et al. 2003, Samuel & Kraljic 2009, Wonnacott et al. 2008). In addition, developmental differences have begun to be uncovered in both language processing (e.g., children’s failure to revise real-time interpretations; Atkinson et al. 2018, Trueswell et al. 1999, Huang & Hollister 2019, Woodard et al. 2016, Weighall 2008) and in learning (e.g., of statistical regularities and rules; Hudson Kam & Newport 2005, Hudson Kam & Chang 2009, Newport 2020). This bridging territory, between processing and acquisition, is fertile ground not only for new research but for new research questions; one must ask how various processing and learning observations of the last three decades coalesce into a more unified theory of language use over the lifetime, and how language learning at any age is shaped by processing considerations. For example, what role does real-time predictive processing play in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax? Are learning procedures that are designed to facilitate processing the same or different from those designed to acquire linguistic knowledge more generally? This issue of Language Acquisition is the product of a special theme of the 34th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, entitled Language Acquisition and Language Processing: Finding New Connections. That session, and this volume, aimed to bring together researchers investigating the mechanisms of language acquisition and process, seeking further cross-pollination with adult psycholinguistic research. To be clear, it is not the case that the divide and conquer approach prevalent in the subfields of language acquisition and process is ready to be abandoned completely. However, dialogue between these subfields is increasing to the point that an important theoretical unification is in sight. By bringing together eminent acquisition and processing researchers, we may begin to better understand how the real-time processing of linguistic input (and the ambient referent world) is connected to acquisition, and how the acquisition process itself might be integrated into theories of language processing. The following is a summary of the articles that appear in this volume, all of which pertain to these issues. As the reader will see, there are emerging themes pertaining to the extent to which there are","PeriodicalId":46920,"journal":{"name":"Language Acquisition","volume":"55 1","pages":"205 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language acquisition and language processing: Finding new connections\",\"authors\":\"J. Trueswell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10489223.2023.2216689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two central questions addressed in psycholinguistics pertain to acquisition and process. First, how do children, exposed to a relatively small sample of language use in context, come to acquire a complete linguistic system that can express an almost limitless number of ideas? Second, how do adults access this acquired linguistic knowledge in such an expert manner that they achieve interpretation in real time as the signal unfolds, typically making distinctions on a millisecond timescale? Traditionally these two questions have been addressed separately, with the field taking a divide and conquer approach, often with great success. However, over the past three decades, the distinction between these questions, and their artificial divide in the discipline, have been blurred. Children as young as 24 months have been observed to interpret speech in real time, deploying their albeit incomplete linguistic knowledge almost as quickly as their adult expert counterparts (e.g., de Carvalho et al. 2016; Choi & Trueswell 2010, Lidz et al. 2017, Trueswell & Gleitman 2007). Likewise, adults have been observed to be highly adaptive, learning new patterns of speech, new terms, and new syntax from brief exposures (e.g., Caplan et al. 2021, Fine & Jaeger 2013, Norris et al. 2003, Samuel & Kraljic 2009, Wonnacott et al. 2008). In addition, developmental differences have begun to be uncovered in both language processing (e.g., children’s failure to revise real-time interpretations; Atkinson et al. 2018, Trueswell et al. 1999, Huang & Hollister 2019, Woodard et al. 2016, Weighall 2008) and in learning (e.g., of statistical regularities and rules; Hudson Kam & Newport 2005, Hudson Kam & Chang 2009, Newport 2020). This bridging territory, between processing and acquisition, is fertile ground not only for new research but for new research questions; one must ask how various processing and learning observations of the last three decades coalesce into a more unified theory of language use over the lifetime, and how language learning at any age is shaped by processing considerations. For example, what role does real-time predictive processing play in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax? Are learning procedures that are designed to facilitate processing the same or different from those designed to acquire linguistic knowledge more generally? This issue of Language Acquisition is the product of a special theme of the 34th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, entitled Language Acquisition and Language Processing: Finding New Connections. That session, and this volume, aimed to bring together researchers investigating the mechanisms of language acquisition and process, seeking further cross-pollination with adult psycholinguistic research. To be clear, it is not the case that the divide and conquer approach prevalent in the subfields of language acquisition and process is ready to be abandoned completely. However, dialogue between these subfields is increasing to the point that an important theoretical unification is in sight. By bringing together eminent acquisition and processing researchers, we may begin to better understand how the real-time processing of linguistic input (and the ambient referent world) is connected to acquisition, and how the acquisition process itself might be integrated into theories of language processing. The following is a summary of the articles that appear in this volume, all of which pertain to these issues. As the reader will see, there are emerging themes pertaining to the extent to which there are\",\"PeriodicalId\":46920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"205 - 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2023.2216689\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2023.2216689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心理语言学的两个核心问题涉及习得和过程。首先,孩子们是如何在语境中接触到一个相对较小的语言使用样本,从而获得一个可以表达几乎无限想法的完整语言系统的?其次,成年人如何以如此专业的方式获取这些习得的语言知识,从而在信号展开时实现实时解释,通常在毫秒的时间尺度上做出区分?传统上,这两个问题是分开解决的,该领域采取分而治之的方法,往往取得了巨大的成功。然而,在过去的三十年里,这些问题之间的区别,以及它们在学科中人为划分的区别,已经变得模糊了。据观察,24个月大的孩子就能实时解释言语,他们运用自己不完整的语言知识的速度几乎与成年专家一样快(例如,de Carvalho等人,2016;Choi & Trueswell 2010, Lidz et al. 2017, Trueswell & Gleitman 2007)。同样,成年人也被观察到具有高度的适应性,可以从简短的接触中学习新的语言模式、新的术语和新的语法(例如,Caplan等人,2021年;Fine & Jaeger, 2013年;Norris等人,2003年;Samuel & Kraljic, 2009年;Wonnacott等人,2008年)。此外,在语言处理方面的发展差异也开始被发现(例如,儿童无法修改实时口译;Atkinson et al. 2018, Trueswell et al. 1999, Huang & Hollister 2019, Woodard et al. 2016, Weighall 2008)和学习(例如,统计规律和规则;Hudson Kam & Newport 2005, Hudson Kam & Chang 2009, Newport 2020)。这个介于加工和获取之间的桥梁领域,不仅是新研究的沃土,也是新研究问题的沃土;人们必须要问,过去三十年的各种加工和学习观察是如何整合成一个更统一的终身语言使用理论的,以及任何年龄的语言学习是如何被加工考虑所塑造的。例如,实时预测处理在词汇和语法习得中扮演什么角色?为促进语言处理而设计的学习程序与为获得更普遍的语言知识而设计的学习程序是相同的还是不同的?这期《语言习得》是第34届纽约市立大学人类句子处理年会的一个特别主题的产物,题为“语言习得和语言处理:寻找新的联系”。该会议和本卷旨在汇集研究语言习得和过程机制的研究人员,寻求与成人心理语言学研究的进一步交叉授粉。需要明确的是,在语言习得和语言过程的子领域中流行的分而治之的方法并不是完全被抛弃的。然而,这些子领域之间的对话正在增加,以至于一个重要的理论统一即将出现。通过汇集杰出的习得和加工研究人员,我们可以开始更好地理解语言输入的实时处理(以及周围的参照世界)是如何与习得联系在一起的,以及习得过程本身是如何整合到语言加工理论中的。以下是本卷中出现的文章摘要,所有这些文章都与这些问题有关。正如读者将看到的,有一些新的主题与之相关
Language acquisition and language processing: Finding new connections
Two central questions addressed in psycholinguistics pertain to acquisition and process. First, how do children, exposed to a relatively small sample of language use in context, come to acquire a complete linguistic system that can express an almost limitless number of ideas? Second, how do adults access this acquired linguistic knowledge in such an expert manner that they achieve interpretation in real time as the signal unfolds, typically making distinctions on a millisecond timescale? Traditionally these two questions have been addressed separately, with the field taking a divide and conquer approach, often with great success. However, over the past three decades, the distinction between these questions, and their artificial divide in the discipline, have been blurred. Children as young as 24 months have been observed to interpret speech in real time, deploying their albeit incomplete linguistic knowledge almost as quickly as their adult expert counterparts (e.g., de Carvalho et al. 2016; Choi & Trueswell 2010, Lidz et al. 2017, Trueswell & Gleitman 2007). Likewise, adults have been observed to be highly adaptive, learning new patterns of speech, new terms, and new syntax from brief exposures (e.g., Caplan et al. 2021, Fine & Jaeger 2013, Norris et al. 2003, Samuel & Kraljic 2009, Wonnacott et al. 2008). In addition, developmental differences have begun to be uncovered in both language processing (e.g., children’s failure to revise real-time interpretations; Atkinson et al. 2018, Trueswell et al. 1999, Huang & Hollister 2019, Woodard et al. 2016, Weighall 2008) and in learning (e.g., of statistical regularities and rules; Hudson Kam & Newport 2005, Hudson Kam & Chang 2009, Newport 2020). This bridging territory, between processing and acquisition, is fertile ground not only for new research but for new research questions; one must ask how various processing and learning observations of the last three decades coalesce into a more unified theory of language use over the lifetime, and how language learning at any age is shaped by processing considerations. For example, what role does real-time predictive processing play in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax? Are learning procedures that are designed to facilitate processing the same or different from those designed to acquire linguistic knowledge more generally? This issue of Language Acquisition is the product of a special theme of the 34th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, entitled Language Acquisition and Language Processing: Finding New Connections. That session, and this volume, aimed to bring together researchers investigating the mechanisms of language acquisition and process, seeking further cross-pollination with adult psycholinguistic research. To be clear, it is not the case that the divide and conquer approach prevalent in the subfields of language acquisition and process is ready to be abandoned completely. However, dialogue between these subfields is increasing to the point that an important theoretical unification is in sight. By bringing together eminent acquisition and processing researchers, we may begin to better understand how the real-time processing of linguistic input (and the ambient referent world) is connected to acquisition, and how the acquisition process itself might be integrated into theories of language processing. The following is a summary of the articles that appear in this volume, all of which pertain to these issues. As the reader will see, there are emerging themes pertaining to the extent to which there are
期刊介绍:
The research published in Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics makes a clear contribution to linguistic theory by increasing our understanding of how language is acquired. The journal focuses on the acquisition of syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, and considers theoretical, experimental, and computational perspectives. Coverage includes solutions to the logical problem of language acquisition, as it arises for particular grammatical proposals; discussion of acquisition data relevant to current linguistic questions; and perspectives derived from theory-driven studies of second language acquisition, language-impaired speakers, and other domains of cognition.