{"title":"论朗格朗戈片剂“Mamari”中的“动力学”类序列","authors":"Tomi S. Melka","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2012.742005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper addresses the question of “kinetic”-like attributes observed on a choice of glyphs in rongorongo tablet “Mamari” (lines 9–10, side b, text C). This tablet, a medium-sized rongorongo text, as near as I can tell, has been aptly referred to by researchers and commentators as containing mixed genres. “Mamari” also has a unique place in the corpus of Easter Island inscriptions due to its “lunar calendar” fragment. The sequence in Cb9–10 elicits interest since it may shed light on the disputed nature of rongorongo script. A suggested textual parallel on side a of “Mamari” gives ground to cautious discussions on the degree of variation, paraphrasing and economy of expression, as well as to the plausible sound-mapping in the rongorongo orthography. Similarly, it is shown by comparison of earlier tracings of Thomas Barthel and Steven R. Fischer with the photographs of the actual artefact that the accuracy of the published drawn corpus still requires some amendments, and hence all further studies are supposed to pay more attention to the use of photographic material or investigation of the original. These issues are especially crucial for palaeographic and calligraphic research.","PeriodicalId":39225,"journal":{"name":"Writing Systems Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"54 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2012.742005","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On a “kinetic”-like sequence in rongorongo tablet “Mamari”\",\"authors\":\"Tomi S. Melka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17586801.2012.742005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The paper addresses the question of “kinetic”-like attributes observed on a choice of glyphs in rongorongo tablet “Mamari” (lines 9–10, side b, text C). This tablet, a medium-sized rongorongo text, as near as I can tell, has been aptly referred to by researchers and commentators as containing mixed genres. “Mamari” also has a unique place in the corpus of Easter Island inscriptions due to its “lunar calendar” fragment. The sequence in Cb9–10 elicits interest since it may shed light on the disputed nature of rongorongo script. A suggested textual parallel on side a of “Mamari” gives ground to cautious discussions on the degree of variation, paraphrasing and economy of expression, as well as to the plausible sound-mapping in the rongorongo orthography. Similarly, it is shown by comparison of earlier tracings of Thomas Barthel and Steven R. Fischer with the photographs of the actual artefact that the accuracy of the published drawn corpus still requires some amendments, and hence all further studies are supposed to pay more attention to the use of photographic material or investigation of the original. These issues are especially crucial for palaeographic and calligraphic research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Writing Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"54 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2012.742005\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Writing Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.742005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2012.742005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
本文讨论了在荣格朗戈石碑“Mamari”(b面9-10行,文本C)中观察到的字形选择中的“动力学”类属性问题。据我所知,这是一块中等大小的荣格朗戈石碑,被研究人员和评论员恰当地称为包含混合体裁。“马马利亚”也因其“农历”碎片在复活节岛铭文语料库中占有独特的地位。Cb9-10中的序列引起了人们的兴趣,因为它可能揭示了朗格朗戈脚本有争议的性质。在“Mamari”的A面提出的文本平行为谨慎讨论变异程度、释义和表达的经济性以及朗格朗格正字法中似是而非的声音映射提供了基础。同样,将Thomas Barthel和Steven R. Fischer的早期描摹与实际人工制品的照片进行比较表明,已发表的绘制语料库的准确性仍然需要一些修改,因此所有进一步的研究都应该更加注意使用摄影材料或对原件的调查。这些问题对古文字研究尤为重要。
On a “kinetic”-like sequence in rongorongo tablet “Mamari”
Abstract The paper addresses the question of “kinetic”-like attributes observed on a choice of glyphs in rongorongo tablet “Mamari” (lines 9–10, side b, text C). This tablet, a medium-sized rongorongo text, as near as I can tell, has been aptly referred to by researchers and commentators as containing mixed genres. “Mamari” also has a unique place in the corpus of Easter Island inscriptions due to its “lunar calendar” fragment. The sequence in Cb9–10 elicits interest since it may shed light on the disputed nature of rongorongo script. A suggested textual parallel on side a of “Mamari” gives ground to cautious discussions on the degree of variation, paraphrasing and economy of expression, as well as to the plausible sound-mapping in the rongorongo orthography. Similarly, it is shown by comparison of earlier tracings of Thomas Barthel and Steven R. Fischer with the photographs of the actual artefact that the accuracy of the published drawn corpus still requires some amendments, and hence all further studies are supposed to pay more attention to the use of photographic material or investigation of the original. These issues are especially crucial for palaeographic and calligraphic research.