英语语素单位敏感性作为第二语言单词识别

Q1 Arts and Humanities Writing Systems Research Pub Date : 2015-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17586801.2014.976165
S. Casalis, Eva Commissaire, Lynne G. Duncan
{"title":"英语语素单位敏感性作为第二语言单词识别","authors":"S. Casalis, Eva Commissaire, Lynne G. Duncan","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2014.976165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is yet known about how L2 learners process morphology during visual word recognition. Two points of view may be contrasted: the first one suggests that L2 learners, as less proficient speakers, may be less sensitive to the computational aspects of word processing such as the morphological structure of complex words, relying more on lexical information; whereas, the second one suggests that word processing is constrained mainly by linguistic aspects, making L2 learners as sensitive to word structure as native speakers. While previous studies have mainly focused on proficient to highly proficient L2 speakers, the present study compared L2 learners of low proficiency with those of intermediate to high levels of proficiency. The role of morphological structure in word recognition and pseudoword processing was examined by manipulating the presence of embedded words and suffixes in items presented for L2 lexical decision. Contrasting patterns in L2 word recognition were observed between groups as the low-proficiency group was more sensitive to the presence of an embedded word than the higher proficiency group in both accuracy and speed. However, pseudowords made up of an embedded word and suffix were significantly more likely to be wrongly accepted as words than other pseudowords by both groups. Furthermore, correct rejection of these items as words induced longer latencies in both groups, indicating a morphological analysis of these pseudowords. Together, the results show that L2 learners, including those who are low in proficiency, are sensitive to the morphological structure of written L2 words.","PeriodicalId":39225,"journal":{"name":"Writing Systems Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"186 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition\",\"authors\":\"S. Casalis, Eva Commissaire, Lynne G. Duncan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17586801.2014.976165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Little is yet known about how L2 learners process morphology during visual word recognition. Two points of view may be contrasted: the first one suggests that L2 learners, as less proficient speakers, may be less sensitive to the computational aspects of word processing such as the morphological structure of complex words, relying more on lexical information; whereas, the second one suggests that word processing is constrained mainly by linguistic aspects, making L2 learners as sensitive to word structure as native speakers. While previous studies have mainly focused on proficient to highly proficient L2 speakers, the present study compared L2 learners of low proficiency with those of intermediate to high levels of proficiency. The role of morphological structure in word recognition and pseudoword processing was examined by manipulating the presence of embedded words and suffixes in items presented for L2 lexical decision. Contrasting patterns in L2 word recognition were observed between groups as the low-proficiency group was more sensitive to the presence of an embedded word than the higher proficiency group in both accuracy and speed. However, pseudowords made up of an embedded word and suffix were significantly more likely to be wrongly accepted as words than other pseudowords by both groups. Furthermore, correct rejection of these items as words induced longer latencies in both groups, indicating a morphological analysis of these pseudowords. Together, the results show that L2 learners, including those who are low in proficiency, are sensitive to the morphological structure of written L2 words.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Writing Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"186 - 201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Writing Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

关于二语学习者在视觉单词识别过程中如何处理词法,我们所知甚少。可以对比两种观点:第一种观点认为,二语学习者作为不太熟练的说话者,可能对文字处理的计算方面(如复杂单词的形态结构)不太敏感,更多地依赖词汇信息;然而,第二种观点认为,文字处理主要受到语言方面的限制,这使得二语学习者对单词结构的敏感度与母语人士一样高。虽然以前的研究主要集中在熟练到高度熟练的二语使用者,但本研究比较了低熟练程度的二语学习者和中高熟练程度的二语学习者。通过操纵二语词汇决策项目中嵌入词和后缀的存在,研究了词形结构在词识别和伪词处理中的作用。在二语单词识别方面,两组之间的对比模式是,低熟练程度组对嵌入词的存在在准确性和速度上比高熟练程度组更敏感。然而,由嵌入词和后缀组成的假词比其他假词更容易被两组人错误地接受。此外,对这些词的正确拒绝在两组中引起了更长的潜伏期,这表明对这些假词进行了形态学分析。综上所述,结果表明,二语学习者,包括那些熟练程度较低的学习者,对二语书面词汇的形态结构都很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition
Little is yet known about how L2 learners process morphology during visual word recognition. Two points of view may be contrasted: the first one suggests that L2 learners, as less proficient speakers, may be less sensitive to the computational aspects of word processing such as the morphological structure of complex words, relying more on lexical information; whereas, the second one suggests that word processing is constrained mainly by linguistic aspects, making L2 learners as sensitive to word structure as native speakers. While previous studies have mainly focused on proficient to highly proficient L2 speakers, the present study compared L2 learners of low proficiency with those of intermediate to high levels of proficiency. The role of morphological structure in word recognition and pseudoword processing was examined by manipulating the presence of embedded words and suffixes in items presented for L2 lexical decision. Contrasting patterns in L2 word recognition were observed between groups as the low-proficiency group was more sensitive to the presence of an embedded word than the higher proficiency group in both accuracy and speed. However, pseudowords made up of an embedded word and suffix were significantly more likely to be wrongly accepted as words than other pseudowords by both groups. Furthermore, correct rejection of these items as words induced longer latencies in both groups, indicating a morphological analysis of these pseudowords. Together, the results show that L2 learners, including those who are low in proficiency, are sensitive to the morphological structure of written L2 words.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Writing Systems Research
Writing Systems Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language ideologies of the transcription system Zhuyin fuhao: a symbol of Taiwanese identity Transcoding number words by bilingual speakers of Arabic: writing multi-digit numbers in a units-decades inverting language Writing between languages: the case of Arabizi Spelling patterns of German 4th graders in French vowels: insights into spelling solutions within and across two alphabetic writing systems Literacy and the language awareness hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1