一个具有良好阅读能力的10岁儿童的“意外”拼写困难:一个干预案例研究

Q1 Arts and Humanities Writing Systems Research Pub Date : 2016-05-23 DOI:10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539
S. Roncoli, J. Masterson
{"title":"一个具有良好阅读能力的10岁儿童的“意外”拼写困难:一个干预案例研究","authors":"S. Roncoli, J. Masterson","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We report a single-case intervention study of Alan, a child aged 10;04, who presented with spelling difficulty but good reading skills. Assessment of the potential cognitive functions underlying the spelling difficulty explored phonological abilities, visual memory and letter report. We also assessed print exposure and verbal memory. Results of analysis of spelling performance revealed an effect of word length on accuracy, and spelling errors involving omission, insertion, substitution and transposition of graphemes. Results of the literacy-related assessments indicated that Alan did not have a phonological or visual memory deficit, but he showed impaired performance in the letter-report task when asked to report all the letters in the five-item test array. On the basis of previous research, we hypothesised that Alan’s unexpectedly poor spelling was due to a graphemic buffer deficit. Two different interventions were employed: a lexical-orthographic programme, followed by one aimed at improving sublexical abilities. The results showed a significant increase in spelling accuracy after the lexical-orthographic intervention for the treated word set, and a small improvement for the untrained words that was significant at delayed post-intervention testing. The improvement was shown to persist over time. No improvement in spelling was observed after the sublexical intervention. The study emphasises the importance of a wide assessment in order to investigate cognitive processes underpinning spelling difficulty.","PeriodicalId":39225,"journal":{"name":"Writing Systems Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"143 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Unexpected’ spelling difficulty in a 10-year-old child with good reading skills: An intervention case study\",\"authors\":\"S. Roncoli, J. Masterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We report a single-case intervention study of Alan, a child aged 10;04, who presented with spelling difficulty but good reading skills. Assessment of the potential cognitive functions underlying the spelling difficulty explored phonological abilities, visual memory and letter report. We also assessed print exposure and verbal memory. Results of analysis of spelling performance revealed an effect of word length on accuracy, and spelling errors involving omission, insertion, substitution and transposition of graphemes. Results of the literacy-related assessments indicated that Alan did not have a phonological or visual memory deficit, but he showed impaired performance in the letter-report task when asked to report all the letters in the five-item test array. On the basis of previous research, we hypothesised that Alan’s unexpectedly poor spelling was due to a graphemic buffer deficit. Two different interventions were employed: a lexical-orthographic programme, followed by one aimed at improving sublexical abilities. The results showed a significant increase in spelling accuracy after the lexical-orthographic intervention for the treated word set, and a small improvement for the untrained words that was significant at delayed post-intervention testing. The improvement was shown to persist over time. No improvement in spelling was observed after the sublexical intervention. The study emphasises the importance of a wide assessment in order to investigate cognitive processes underpinning spelling difficulty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Writing Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"143 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Writing Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2016.1159539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们报告了一项针对Alan的单例干预研究,Alan是一名10.04岁的儿童,他表现出拼写困难但具有良好的阅读能力。评估拼写困难的潜在认知功能,探讨语音能力、视觉记忆和字母报告。我们还评估了印刷品暴露和言语记忆。结果显示,单词长度对拼写准确性有影响,拼写错误包括遗漏、插入、替换和换位。与读写能力相关的测试结果表明,艾伦并没有语音或视觉记忆缺陷,但在字母报告任务中,当他被要求报告五项测试中所有的字母时,他表现得很差。根据之前的研究,我们假设图灵的拼写异常糟糕是由于文字缓冲缺陷造成的。采用了两种不同的干预措施:一种是词汇-正字法计划,其次是旨在提高亚词汇能力的计划。结果显示,经过词汇-正字法干预后,经过训练的单词组的拼写准确性有了显著提高,而未经训练的单词在延迟干预后测试中有了显著提高。这种改善可以持续一段时间。在亚词汇干预后,没有观察到拼写方面的改善。这项研究强调了广泛评估的重要性,以调查导致拼写困难的认知过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Unexpected’ spelling difficulty in a 10-year-old child with good reading skills: An intervention case study
ABSTRACT We report a single-case intervention study of Alan, a child aged 10;04, who presented with spelling difficulty but good reading skills. Assessment of the potential cognitive functions underlying the spelling difficulty explored phonological abilities, visual memory and letter report. We also assessed print exposure and verbal memory. Results of analysis of spelling performance revealed an effect of word length on accuracy, and spelling errors involving omission, insertion, substitution and transposition of graphemes. Results of the literacy-related assessments indicated that Alan did not have a phonological or visual memory deficit, but he showed impaired performance in the letter-report task when asked to report all the letters in the five-item test array. On the basis of previous research, we hypothesised that Alan’s unexpectedly poor spelling was due to a graphemic buffer deficit. Two different interventions were employed: a lexical-orthographic programme, followed by one aimed at improving sublexical abilities. The results showed a significant increase in spelling accuracy after the lexical-orthographic intervention for the treated word set, and a small improvement for the untrained words that was significant at delayed post-intervention testing. The improvement was shown to persist over time. No improvement in spelling was observed after the sublexical intervention. The study emphasises the importance of a wide assessment in order to investigate cognitive processes underpinning spelling difficulty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Writing Systems Research
Writing Systems Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language ideologies of the transcription system Zhuyin fuhao: a symbol of Taiwanese identity Transcoding number words by bilingual speakers of Arabic: writing multi-digit numbers in a units-decades inverting language Writing between languages: the case of Arabizi Spelling patterns of German 4th graders in French vowels: insights into spelling solutions within and across two alphabetic writing systems Literacy and the language awareness hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1