“好生意”和“野生动物”的收藏

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology Pub Date : 2001-09-01 DOI:10.1080/14442210110001706095
Flip VanHelden
{"title":"“好生意”和“野生动物”的收藏","authors":"Flip VanHelden","doi":"10.1080/14442210110001706095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years the ongoing debate in development and resource management has tended to present a strengthening of and a shift in responsibility to local people as a panacea to past ills. The emphasis on communities is part of a wider shift in thinking about the relative roles of the state, the market and the 'intermediary structures' (Bulmer in Crow and Allan 1994:1) coming under the term 'community'. The recent fashion for community-founded resource management is founded on the pursuit of conservation goals by including, rather than excluding, local people in project planning, decision-making and implementation. The roots of this 'new conservation' (Hulme and Murphree 1999) can be traced to a number of developments. In the first place, conservation thinking is making a shift from the preservationist framework aimed at segregating humans from nature, towards notions of 'sustainable development' that aim to integrate the needs of humans with that of nature. The call for sustainable development rather than national park formation, and a new emphasis on the conservation of biodiversity outside protected areas is aided by the recognition that reducing conservation to 'islands' in a 'sea' of degraded landscapes offers no hope of survival for many species. The same insight as well as the political cost of protected area establishment has led many densely populated European countries to integrate the requirements of conservation with human activities in a living multi-purpose landscape rather than to pursue a policy of segregation. In this perspective, the 'community' comprising both local people and their natural resources has become the locus of intervention. A second element leading to a renewed focus on the responsibility of local people in resource management comes from a shift in thinking on the role of the state and its public policies vis-A-vis civic society. Where until the 1970s, the state with its national parks was seen as taking responsibility for managing the public interest, the 1980s witnessed an increasingly influential","PeriodicalId":45108,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14442210110001706095","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Good business’ and the collection of ‘wild lives’\",\"authors\":\"Flip VanHelden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14442210110001706095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years the ongoing debate in development and resource management has tended to present a strengthening of and a shift in responsibility to local people as a panacea to past ills. The emphasis on communities is part of a wider shift in thinking about the relative roles of the state, the market and the 'intermediary structures' (Bulmer in Crow and Allan 1994:1) coming under the term 'community'. The recent fashion for community-founded resource management is founded on the pursuit of conservation goals by including, rather than excluding, local people in project planning, decision-making and implementation. The roots of this 'new conservation' (Hulme and Murphree 1999) can be traced to a number of developments. In the first place, conservation thinking is making a shift from the preservationist framework aimed at segregating humans from nature, towards notions of 'sustainable development' that aim to integrate the needs of humans with that of nature. The call for sustainable development rather than national park formation, and a new emphasis on the conservation of biodiversity outside protected areas is aided by the recognition that reducing conservation to 'islands' in a 'sea' of degraded landscapes offers no hope of survival for many species. The same insight as well as the political cost of protected area establishment has led many densely populated European countries to integrate the requirements of conservation with human activities in a living multi-purpose landscape rather than to pursue a policy of segregation. In this perspective, the 'community' comprising both local people and their natural resources has become the locus of intervention. A second element leading to a renewed focus on the responsibility of local people in resource management comes from a shift in thinking on the role of the state and its public policies vis-A-vis civic society. Where until the 1970s, the state with its national parks was seen as taking responsibility for managing the public interest, the 1980s witnessed an increasingly influential\",\"PeriodicalId\":45108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14442210110001706095\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14442210110001706095\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14442210110001706095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,在发展和资源管理方面正在进行的辩论倾向于把加强和把责任转移给当地人民,作为解决过去弊病的灵丹妙药。对社区的强调是对国家、市场和“中介结构”(Bulmer in Crow and Allan 1994:1)在“社区”一词下的相对角色的思考的更广泛转变的一部分。最近社区建立的资源管理的时尚是建立在追求保护目标的基础上,在项目规划、决策和实施中包括而不是排除当地居民。这种“新保护”的根源(Hulme和Murphree 1999)可以追溯到许多发展。首先,保护思想正在从旨在将人类与自然隔离的保护主义框架转变为旨在将人类需求与自然需求整合在一起的“可持续发展”概念。人们认识到,将保护区缩小为退化景观“海洋”中的“岛屿”,对许多物种来说没有生存的希望,这有助于呼吁可持续发展而不是建立国家公园,并重新强调保护保护区以外的生物多样性。同样的洞察力以及建立保护区的政治成本,导致许多人口稠密的欧洲国家将保护的要求与人类活动结合在一起,形成一个生动的多用途景观,而不是奉行隔离政策。从这个角度来看,由当地人和他们的自然资源组成的“社区”已经成为干预的场所。导致重新关注当地人在资源管理中的责任的第二个因素,来自对国家及其公共政策相对于公民社会的角色的思考转变。在20世纪70年代之前,拥有国家公园的国家被视为负责管理公共利益,而在20世纪80年代,国家公园的影响力越来越大
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Good business’ and the collection of ‘wild lives’
In recent years the ongoing debate in development and resource management has tended to present a strengthening of and a shift in responsibility to local people as a panacea to past ills. The emphasis on communities is part of a wider shift in thinking about the relative roles of the state, the market and the 'intermediary structures' (Bulmer in Crow and Allan 1994:1) coming under the term 'community'. The recent fashion for community-founded resource management is founded on the pursuit of conservation goals by including, rather than excluding, local people in project planning, decision-making and implementation. The roots of this 'new conservation' (Hulme and Murphree 1999) can be traced to a number of developments. In the first place, conservation thinking is making a shift from the preservationist framework aimed at segregating humans from nature, towards notions of 'sustainable development' that aim to integrate the needs of humans with that of nature. The call for sustainable development rather than national park formation, and a new emphasis on the conservation of biodiversity outside protected areas is aided by the recognition that reducing conservation to 'islands' in a 'sea' of degraded landscapes offers no hope of survival for many species. The same insight as well as the political cost of protected area establishment has led many densely populated European countries to integrate the requirements of conservation with human activities in a living multi-purpose landscape rather than to pursue a policy of segregation. In this perspective, the 'community' comprising both local people and their natural resources has become the locus of intervention. A second element leading to a renewed focus on the responsibility of local people in resource management comes from a shift in thinking on the role of the state and its public policies vis-A-vis civic society. Where until the 1970s, the state with its national parks was seen as taking responsibility for managing the public interest, the 1980s witnessed an increasingly influential
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Statement of Removal Epilogue: Customary Land Rights and Politics, 25 Years On Economic Techno-Politics and Technocratic Development in the Oecusse-Ambeno Enclave, Timor-Leste The Nuns of Lepers: Compassion, Discipline and Surrogate Parenthood in a Former Leper Colony of Vietnam Techniques of Death: Buddhist Practice, Femininity and Self-Cultivation at the Last Stage of Life in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1