谁把朝鲜当回事?美国国会与对朝政策,2009-2012

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Korean Journal of Defense Analysis Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim290050056
Seo Jungkun
{"title":"谁把朝鲜当回事?美国国会与对朝政策,2009-2012","authors":"Seo Jungkun","doi":"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim290050056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How and why do legislative members weigh in on foreign policy dilemmas? U.S. Congress often seeks to carve out spheres of influence over international relations and yet we know little about why and how some America`s lawmakers take North Korea seriously. This article explores a host of North Korea measures during the111th and 112th U.S. Congress (2009.2012) and identifies the sources of legislative activism toward Pyongyang`s nuclear weapons threats and atrocious human rights records. Empirical analyses show that a group of congressional members use bill cosponsor ship strategies and call on the Obama administration to revamp its policy concerning North Korea. The findings shed light on why lawmakers would bother to introduce such specialized foreign policy bills even if their prospects for becoming law are uncertain.","PeriodicalId":43274,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Defense Analysis","volume":"25 1","pages":"191-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Takes North Korea Seriously? U.S. Congress and Policy toward Pyongyang, 2009-2012\",\"authors\":\"Seo Jungkun\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim290050056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How and why do legislative members weigh in on foreign policy dilemmas? U.S. Congress often seeks to carve out spheres of influence over international relations and yet we know little about why and how some America`s lawmakers take North Korea seriously. This article explores a host of North Korea measures during the111th and 112th U.S. Congress (2009.2012) and identifies the sources of legislative activism toward Pyongyang`s nuclear weapons threats and atrocious human rights records. Empirical analyses show that a group of congressional members use bill cosponsor ship strategies and call on the Obama administration to revamp its policy concerning North Korea. The findings shed light on why lawmakers would bother to introduce such specialized foreign policy bills even if their prospects for becoming law are uncertain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Defense Analysis\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"191-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Defense Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim290050056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Defense Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim290050056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

立法委员如何以及为什么要权衡外交政策困境?美国国会经常寻求在国际关系中划分势力范围,但我们对一些美国议员为什么以及如何认真对待朝鲜知之甚少。本文探讨了第111届和第112届美国国会(2009年至2012年)期间对朝鲜采取的一系列措施,并确定了针对平壤核武器威胁和恶劣人权记录的立法活动的来源。实证分析表明,一些国会议员利用法案共同提案人战略,呼吁奥巴马政府修改对朝政策。调查结果揭示了为什么议员们会费心提出这种专门的外交政策法案,即使它们成为法律的前景并不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Takes North Korea Seriously? U.S. Congress and Policy toward Pyongyang, 2009-2012
How and why do legislative members weigh in on foreign policy dilemmas? U.S. Congress often seeks to carve out spheres of influence over international relations and yet we know little about why and how some America`s lawmakers take North Korea seriously. This article explores a host of North Korea measures during the111th and 112th U.S. Congress (2009.2012) and identifies the sources of legislative activism toward Pyongyang`s nuclear weapons threats and atrocious human rights records. Empirical analyses show that a group of congressional members use bill cosponsor ship strategies and call on the Obama administration to revamp its policy concerning North Korea. The findings shed light on why lawmakers would bother to introduce such specialized foreign policy bills even if their prospects for becoming law are uncertain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
Korean Journal of Defense Analysis INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Since its first publication in 1989, The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis has been covering a broad range of topics related to foreign policy, defense and international affairs in the Asia-Pacific region. As the oldest SSCI registered English journal of political science in Asia, The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis has promoted efforts to provide an arena for sharing initiatives and new perspectives on military and security issues of the Asia-Pacific region. To offer better support to this idea of active intercommunication amongst scholars and defense experts around the globe, The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis made a decision to publish quarterly, starting from 2005.
期刊最新文献
Capabilities-Based “Confusion”: Why Capabilities-Based Planning Systems Struggle Analysis of Electronic Warfare Capability of the People’s Liberation Army Strategic Support Force (PLASSF): Its Impacts and Implications on Korean Security Democracy and Diversionary Conflict: External Transparency and Domestic Constraints Conceptualizing and Framing Economic Security?: The Case of 30 Year Russian-Korean Security Relations Tested Negotiating Nuclear Arms Control with North Korea: Why and How?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1