质量管理学科道德规范的建议:大学间比较

M. Vilamitjana, J. J. T. Guilló
{"title":"质量管理学科道德规范的建议:大学间比较","authors":"M. Vilamitjana, J. J. T. Guilló","doi":"10.12795/EDUCADE.2013.I04.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European framework for higher ed ucation meant recycling the teaching methodology. One characteristic of the Bologna Agreement is the students� continuous assessments, which are periodically evaluated to analyse the scope of their knowledge and competence development. The success of this approach depends on the motivation and satisfaction of students; therefore, the first aim of this paper is to analyse the students� satisfaction with the continuous assessment methodology. New teaching-learning system requires more interaction between lecturers-students and students-students. This increases the need for standards of behavior in classes. Therefore, the second aim is to propose a code of conduct for the Quality Management subject. The methodology applied to know the students� satisfaction is a questionnaire about different aspects of the subject, among them the evalua tion methodology. The code of conduct is proposed by the student�s as an exercise of t he continuous assessment. The analysis has been done at the Universidad de Alicante and Universitat de Barcelona. The results show similar opinions regarding the te aching methodology. For example, the students prefer the continuous assessment rather the traditional evaluation. Similarly, the most highlighted aspects of the codes of conduct are: legal compliance, respect people, punishing inadequate behaviours such as cheating,corruption, bribery, etc. The code of conduct proposal presented is for both universities and for the specific subject, but it has the will to be implemented in other subjects wishing to follow this practice","PeriodicalId":53188,"journal":{"name":"Educade-Revista de Educacion en Contabilidad Finanzas y Administracion de Empresas","volume":"1 1","pages":"111-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propuesta de código ético para la asignatura de Gestión de la Calidad: comparativa interuniversitaria\",\"authors\":\"M. Vilamitjana, J. J. T. Guilló\",\"doi\":\"10.12795/EDUCADE.2013.I04.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European framework for higher ed ucation meant recycling the teaching methodology. One characteristic of the Bologna Agreement is the students� continuous assessments, which are periodically evaluated to analyse the scope of their knowledge and competence development. The success of this approach depends on the motivation and satisfaction of students; therefore, the first aim of this paper is to analyse the students� satisfaction with the continuous assessment methodology. New teaching-learning system requires more interaction between lecturers-students and students-students. This increases the need for standards of behavior in classes. Therefore, the second aim is to propose a code of conduct for the Quality Management subject. The methodology applied to know the students� satisfaction is a questionnaire about different aspects of the subject, among them the evalua tion methodology. The code of conduct is proposed by the student�s as an exercise of t he continuous assessment. The analysis has been done at the Universidad de Alicante and Universitat de Barcelona. The results show similar opinions regarding the te aching methodology. For example, the students prefer the continuous assessment rather the traditional evaluation. Similarly, the most highlighted aspects of the codes of conduct are: legal compliance, respect people, punishing inadequate behaviours such as cheating,corruption, bribery, etc. The code of conduct proposal presented is for both universities and for the specific subject, but it has the will to be implemented in other subjects wishing to follow this practice\",\"PeriodicalId\":53188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educade-Revista de Educacion en Contabilidad Finanzas y Administracion de Empresas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"111-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educade-Revista de Educacion en Contabilidad Finanzas y Administracion de Empresas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12795/EDUCADE.2013.I04.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educade-Revista de Educacion en Contabilidad Finanzas y Administracion de Empresas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12795/EDUCADE.2013.I04.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

欧洲高等教育框架意味着教学方法的再循环。《博洛尼亚协定》的一个特点是学生的持续评估,定期评估以分析他们的知识和能力发展的范围。这种方法的成功取决于学生的动机和满意度;因此,本文的第一个目的是分析学生对持续评估方法的满意度。新的教与学系统需要更多的师生和学生之间的互动。这增加了对类行为标准的需求。因此,第二个目标是提出质量管理主体的行为准则。了解学生满意度的方法是对学科的不同方面进行问卷调查,其中包括评价方法。行为准则是由学生提出的,作为对持续评估的一种练习。这项分析由阿利坎特大学和巴塞罗那大学共同完成。结果显示,在教学方法上,学生们的看法是一致的。例如,学生更喜欢持续的评估而不是传统的评估。同样,行为准则中最突出的方面是:遵守法律、尊重他人、惩罚作弊、腐败、贿赂等不当行为。所提出的行为准则建议既适用于大学,也适用于特定学科,但有意愿在其他希望遵循这一做法的学科中实施
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Propuesta de código ético para la asignatura de Gestión de la Calidad: comparativa interuniversitaria
The European framework for higher ed ucation meant recycling the teaching methodology. One characteristic of the Bologna Agreement is the students� continuous assessments, which are periodically evaluated to analyse the scope of their knowledge and competence development. The success of this approach depends on the motivation and satisfaction of students; therefore, the first aim of this paper is to analyse the students� satisfaction with the continuous assessment methodology. New teaching-learning system requires more interaction between lecturers-students and students-students. This increases the need for standards of behavior in classes. Therefore, the second aim is to propose a code of conduct for the Quality Management subject. The methodology applied to know the students� satisfaction is a questionnaire about different aspects of the subject, among them the evalua tion methodology. The code of conduct is proposed by the student�s as an exercise of t he continuous assessment. The analysis has been done at the Universidad de Alicante and Universitat de Barcelona. The results show similar opinions regarding the te aching methodology. For example, the students prefer the continuous assessment rather the traditional evaluation. Similarly, the most highlighted aspects of the codes of conduct are: legal compliance, respect people, punishing inadequate behaviours such as cheating,corruption, bribery, etc. The code of conduct proposal presented is for both universities and for the specific subject, but it has the will to be implemented in other subjects wishing to follow this practice
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does manager’s education play a significant role in company’s financial performance? An empirical study of the best-performing CEOs in the world Necesidad de aumentar el nivel de la educación financiera en Estudios reglados no especializados ¿Cómo fomentar las competencias profesionales? Aplicación del aprendizaje basado en problemas en contabilidad de costes Innovations, passing fads and serious questions to consider (Editoria). EL ORDENAMIENTO JURÍDICO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1