论圣经文本解释的二元原则

Q3 Arts and Humanities Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem Pub Date : 2022-12-18 DOI:10.12797/moap.28.2022.58.08
Jolanta Szarlej
{"title":"论圣经文本解释的二元原则","authors":"Jolanta Szarlej","doi":"10.12797/moap.28.2022.58.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying the forms of Semitic literature that underlie the biblical text is still a task to be undertaken – as important as it is complicated, which even very experienced researchers, such as Roland Meynet, assert. The authoress adopts the basic tools of rhetorical analysis, formulated by Meynet, and then examines selected texts of The Old Testament in search of a few specifically Semitic features of beauty in the remarkable Book of Books. Parataxis is, according to Meynet, the most important feature of biblical language, and it is based in binary, seen – in Meynet’s terminology – at all levels of the biblical message organization: at the first level, i.e., ‘language or grammar;’ at the second level, i.e., ‘words or discourse;’ at the third level, i.e., the entire Book. Therefore, the authoress has assumed three presuppositions of rhetorical analysis, believing them to be true not only in relation to textual units, i.e., distiches or tristiches, ‘excerpts,’ pericopes, sequences, chapters, and books, but also linguistic units ranging from phonemes, through morphemes and lexemes to sentences. Through the analysis of subsequent texts, the authoress wants to prove that binary does not presuppose a simple repetition, but the interplay of doubled form and doubled content – between them, a deep sense is hidden, which should be unveiled and brought up to date.","PeriodicalId":36042,"journal":{"name":"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Binary Principle of Biblical Texts Interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Jolanta Szarlej\",\"doi\":\"10.12797/moap.28.2022.58.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying the forms of Semitic literature that underlie the biblical text is still a task to be undertaken – as important as it is complicated, which even very experienced researchers, such as Roland Meynet, assert. The authoress adopts the basic tools of rhetorical analysis, formulated by Meynet, and then examines selected texts of The Old Testament in search of a few specifically Semitic features of beauty in the remarkable Book of Books. Parataxis is, according to Meynet, the most important feature of biblical language, and it is based in binary, seen – in Meynet’s terminology – at all levels of the biblical message organization: at the first level, i.e., ‘language or grammar;’ at the second level, i.e., ‘words or discourse;’ at the third level, i.e., the entire Book. Therefore, the authoress has assumed three presuppositions of rhetorical analysis, believing them to be true not only in relation to textual units, i.e., distiches or tristiches, ‘excerpts,’ pericopes, sequences, chapters, and books, but also linguistic units ranging from phonemes, through morphemes and lexemes to sentences. Through the analysis of subsequent texts, the authoress wants to prove that binary does not presuppose a simple repetition, but the interplay of doubled form and doubled content – between them, a deep sense is hidden, which should be unveiled and brought up to date.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12797/moap.28.2022.58.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/moap.28.2022.58.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定作为圣经文本基础的闪米特文学的形式仍然是一项有待完成的任务——它既重要又复杂,即使是像罗兰·梅尼特这样经验丰富的研究人员也断言。作者采用了梅尼特提出的修辞分析的基本工具,然后考察了《旧约》中选定的文本,在这部非凡的《书之书》中寻找一些特别的闪米特美特征。根据梅尼特的说法,合意是圣经语言最重要的特征,它以二元为基础,用梅尼特的术语来说,它出现在圣经信息组织的所有层面:在第一级,即“语言或语法”;在第二级,即“词语或话语”;在第三级,即整本书。因此,作者假设了修辞学分析的三个前提,相信它们不仅在篇章单位,即双段落或三段落,“节选”,pericopes,序列,章节和书籍方面是正确的,而且在从音素,语素和词汇到句子的语言单位方面也是正确的。通过对后续文本的分析,作者想要证明二元不是简单的重复,而是双重形式和双重内容的相互作用——在它们之间隐藏着一种深刻的意义,这种意义应该被揭示和更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Binary Principle of Biblical Texts Interpretation
Identifying the forms of Semitic literature that underlie the biblical text is still a task to be undertaken – as important as it is complicated, which even very experienced researchers, such as Roland Meynet, assert. The authoress adopts the basic tools of rhetorical analysis, formulated by Meynet, and then examines selected texts of The Old Testament in search of a few specifically Semitic features of beauty in the remarkable Book of Books. Parataxis is, according to Meynet, the most important feature of biblical language, and it is based in binary, seen – in Meynet’s terminology – at all levels of the biblical message organization: at the first level, i.e., ‘language or grammar;’ at the second level, i.e., ‘words or discourse;’ at the third level, i.e., the entire Book. Therefore, the authoress has assumed three presuppositions of rhetorical analysis, believing them to be true not only in relation to textual units, i.e., distiches or tristiches, ‘excerpts,’ pericopes, sequences, chapters, and books, but also linguistic units ranging from phonemes, through morphemes and lexemes to sentences. Through the analysis of subsequent texts, the authoress wants to prove that binary does not presuppose a simple repetition, but the interplay of doubled form and doubled content – between them, a deep sense is hidden, which should be unveiled and brought up to date.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem
Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
théorie interprétative de Danica Seleskovitch vingt ans après Liaisons fructueuses : théories des sémioticiens français comme source d’inspiration pour les chercheurs polonais en traduction intersémiotique (In)traduisibles : la traductologie française récente face aux figements linguistiques et aux jeux de mots Jalons pour une historiographie de l’aire traductologique francophone (2ème partie) L’omission et ses avatars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1