1960-2010年荷兰历史教科书中的大屠杀再现

M. V. Berkel
{"title":"1960-2010年荷兰历史教科书中的大屠杀再现","authors":"M. V. Berkel","doi":"10.13128/STUDI_FORMAZ-18015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When teaching emotionally taxing and historically complex topics, many teachers rely on history textbooks. The Holocaust, being a mandatory subject in the Netherlands from the 1960s onwards, is such a topic. In most of the textbooks that I have analyzed from the period 1960-2010, representations of the Holocaust ignore the complexity of the Holocaust. Factual renditions are inaccurate, the historical context of Judaism is completely absent and the ‘perpetrator narrative’ is still the most dominant viewpoint of the Holocaust in most textbooks. In most cases, the Holocaust is seen as a by-product of World War Two, an event in itself but not as the most tragic part of Jewish life and culture in Europe. The richness of Jewish culture and the difficulties in the long-lasting relation between Jews and non-Jews in the Netherlands is mostly marginalized or not mentioned at all. Dutch society after 1945 was being reconstructed and entangled into the Cold War. The contradistinction to a new form of totalitarianism or the celebration of the heroic ‘active’ victims offered significant value to this resurrection of the nation. The Dutch continued to witness themselves as victims of the German occupation. It was not until the 1980s that the passive victims, in particular the Jews, gradually obtained more attention in public commemorations.  In the textbooks however, representations of the Holocaust basically remain incomplete, unmethodical and serving the national narrative.","PeriodicalId":30519,"journal":{"name":"Studi sulla Formazione","volume":"18 1","pages":"47-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holocaust representation in Dutch history textbooks 1960-2010\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Berkel\",\"doi\":\"10.13128/STUDI_FORMAZ-18015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When teaching emotionally taxing and historically complex topics, many teachers rely on history textbooks. The Holocaust, being a mandatory subject in the Netherlands from the 1960s onwards, is such a topic. In most of the textbooks that I have analyzed from the period 1960-2010, representations of the Holocaust ignore the complexity of the Holocaust. Factual renditions are inaccurate, the historical context of Judaism is completely absent and the ‘perpetrator narrative’ is still the most dominant viewpoint of the Holocaust in most textbooks. In most cases, the Holocaust is seen as a by-product of World War Two, an event in itself but not as the most tragic part of Jewish life and culture in Europe. The richness of Jewish culture and the difficulties in the long-lasting relation between Jews and non-Jews in the Netherlands is mostly marginalized or not mentioned at all. Dutch society after 1945 was being reconstructed and entangled into the Cold War. The contradistinction to a new form of totalitarianism or the celebration of the heroic ‘active’ victims offered significant value to this resurrection of the nation. The Dutch continued to witness themselves as victims of the German occupation. It was not until the 1980s that the passive victims, in particular the Jews, gradually obtained more attention in public commemorations.  In the textbooks however, representations of the Holocaust basically remain incomplete, unmethodical and serving the national narrative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studi sulla Formazione\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"47-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studi sulla Formazione\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13128/STUDI_FORMAZ-18015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studi sulla Formazione","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/STUDI_FORMAZ-18015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在教授情感负担和历史复杂的主题时,许多教师依赖于历史教科书。大屠杀就是这样一个话题,从20世纪60年代起,大屠杀就成了荷兰的必修科目。在我分析的1960年至2010年期间的大多数教科书中,对大屠杀的表述忽视了大屠杀的复杂性。事实解释是不准确的,犹太教的历史背景完全缺失,“肇事者叙述”仍然是大多数教科书中关于大屠杀的最主要观点。在大多数情况下,大屠杀被视为第二次世界大战的副产品,它本身是一个事件,但不是欧洲犹太人生活和文化中最悲惨的部分。荷兰丰富的犹太文化和犹太人与非犹太人之间长期关系的困难大多被边缘化或根本不被提及。1945年后的荷兰社会正在重建,并陷入了冷战。与一种新形式的极权主义的对比,或对英勇的“积极”受害者的庆祝,为民族的复兴提供了重要的价值。荷兰人继续目睹自己是德国占领的受害者。直到20世纪80年代,被动受害者,特别是犹太人,才逐渐在公共纪念活动中得到更多的关注。然而,在教科书中,对大屠杀的描述基本上仍然不完整,没有条理,并为国家叙述服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Holocaust representation in Dutch history textbooks 1960-2010
When teaching emotionally taxing and historically complex topics, many teachers rely on history textbooks. The Holocaust, being a mandatory subject in the Netherlands from the 1960s onwards, is such a topic. In most of the textbooks that I have analyzed from the period 1960-2010, representations of the Holocaust ignore the complexity of the Holocaust. Factual renditions are inaccurate, the historical context of Judaism is completely absent and the ‘perpetrator narrative’ is still the most dominant viewpoint of the Holocaust in most textbooks. In most cases, the Holocaust is seen as a by-product of World War Two, an event in itself but not as the most tragic part of Jewish life and culture in Europe. The richness of Jewish culture and the difficulties in the long-lasting relation between Jews and non-Jews in the Netherlands is mostly marginalized or not mentioned at all. Dutch society after 1945 was being reconstructed and entangled into the Cold War. The contradistinction to a new form of totalitarianism or the celebration of the heroic ‘active’ victims offered significant value to this resurrection of the nation. The Dutch continued to witness themselves as victims of the German occupation. It was not until the 1980s that the passive victims, in particular the Jews, gradually obtained more attention in public commemorations.  In the textbooks however, representations of the Holocaust basically remain incomplete, unmethodical and serving the national narrative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
How to use storytelling in a strategic partnership between higher education and primary schools: writing for inclusion Gianni Rodari: un aedo del Novecento Build Yourself A Levee Deep Inside Beyond Montessori: comparative and diachronic reflections on the theme of differences Paura e conflitto intergenerazionale durante e dopo la pandemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1