Jéssica M Paiva, Marina S Melani, R. Gonçalves, M. Luz, M. Mendlowicz, I. Figueira, Cheyenne von Arcosy, P. Ventura, W. Berger
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍患者对认知行为治疗反应的预测因素:一项系统综述","authors":"Jéssica M Paiva, Marina S Melani, R. Gonçalves, M. Luz, M. Mendlowicz, I. Figueira, Cheyenne von Arcosy, P. Ventura, W. Berger","doi":"10.1590/0047-2085000000375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disorder. Even when treated with the first-line intervention, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), 45% of the patients continue suffering from this disorder. Therefore, knowing the factors that could foresee who will respond to CBT would be of great value to the treatment of these patients. Thus, we have systematically reviewed the literature to identify the variables that could predict response to CBT in patients suffering from PTSD. Methods Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched the electronic databases ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and PTSDpubs until November 2021. Two authors have independently conducted study selection and data extraction. Studies that examined possible predictors of response to therapy on a sample of adults (18-65 years), both genders, with and without comorbidities were considered eligible. The characteristics of the studies were synthesized in a table. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias quality assessment tool. Results Twenty-eight studies comprising 15 variables were selected. Among those, eight showed a low risk of bias, 19 showed some concerns, and one showed a high potential risk of bias. The therapeutic relationship was the only variable considered to be a predictor of a good response to therapy. All other variables showed conflicting results. Conclusions The most promising variable, although scientifically weak, is the therapeutic relationship. Additional randomized clinical trials should be conducted to clarify the role of this variable as a predictor of response to CBT in patients with PTSD.","PeriodicalId":39594,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of response to cognitive-behavioral therapy in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jéssica M Paiva, Marina S Melani, R. Gonçalves, M. Luz, M. Mendlowicz, I. Figueira, Cheyenne von Arcosy, P. Ventura, W. Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0047-2085000000375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disorder. Even when treated with the first-line intervention, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), 45% of the patients continue suffering from this disorder. Therefore, knowing the factors that could foresee who will respond to CBT would be of great value to the treatment of these patients. Thus, we have systematically reviewed the literature to identify the variables that could predict response to CBT in patients suffering from PTSD. Methods Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched the electronic databases ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and PTSDpubs until November 2021. Two authors have independently conducted study selection and data extraction. Studies that examined possible predictors of response to therapy on a sample of adults (18-65 years), both genders, with and without comorbidities were considered eligible. The characteristics of the studies were synthesized in a table. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias quality assessment tool. Results Twenty-eight studies comprising 15 variables were selected. Among those, eight showed a low risk of bias, 19 showed some concerns, and one showed a high potential risk of bias. The therapeutic relationship was the only variable considered to be a predictor of a good response to therapy. All other variables showed conflicting results. Conclusions The most promising variable, although scientifically weak, is the therapeutic relationship. Additional randomized clinical trials should be conducted to clarify the role of this variable as a predictor of response to CBT in patients with PTSD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要目的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是一种高发致残的疾病。即使接受了一线干预,认知行为疗法(CBT),仍有45%的患者继续遭受这种疾病的折磨。因此,了解哪些患者会对CBT产生反应的因素对这些患者的治疗具有重要的价值。因此,我们系统地回顾了文献,以确定可以预测PTSD患者对CBT反应的变量。方法按照PRISMA 2020指南,检索ISI Web of Science、Scopus、PsycINFO、MEDLINE和PTSDpubs等电子数据库,检索时间截止到2021年11月。两位作者独立进行了研究选择和数据提取。对成年人(18-65岁),不分性别,有无合并症的治疗反应的可能预测因素的研究被认为是合格的。将研究的特点综合在一个表格中。偏倚风险采用Cochrane偏倚风险质量评估工具进行评估。结果共纳入28项研究,包含15个变量。其中,8篇偏倚风险较低,19篇偏倚风险较高,1篇偏倚风险较高。治疗关系是唯一被认为是对治疗有良好反应的预测变量。所有其他变量显示出相互矛盾的结果。结论虽然科学上薄弱,但最有希望的变量是治疗关系。应该进行额外的随机临床试验,以明确该变量作为PTSD患者对CBT反应的预测因子的作用。
Predictors of response to cognitive-behavioral therapy in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
ABSTRACT Objective Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disorder. Even when treated with the first-line intervention, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), 45% of the patients continue suffering from this disorder. Therefore, knowing the factors that could foresee who will respond to CBT would be of great value to the treatment of these patients. Thus, we have systematically reviewed the literature to identify the variables that could predict response to CBT in patients suffering from PTSD. Methods Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched the electronic databases ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and PTSDpubs until November 2021. Two authors have independently conducted study selection and data extraction. Studies that examined possible predictors of response to therapy on a sample of adults (18-65 years), both genders, with and without comorbidities were considered eligible. The characteristics of the studies were synthesized in a table. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias quality assessment tool. Results Twenty-eight studies comprising 15 variables were selected. Among those, eight showed a low risk of bias, 19 showed some concerns, and one showed a high potential risk of bias. The therapeutic relationship was the only variable considered to be a predictor of a good response to therapy. All other variables showed conflicting results. Conclusions The most promising variable, although scientifically weak, is the therapeutic relationship. Additional randomized clinical trials should be conducted to clarify the role of this variable as a predictor of response to CBT in patients with PTSD.
期刊介绍:
O Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria se insere em programas de educação continuada e atualização e tem como missão divulgar trabalhos de pesquisa (realizados em instituições brasileiras e estrangeiras) cujos resultados tenham potencial para a investigação e prática clínica no campo da Psiquiatria. Criado em 1938, foi publicado até 1950, sob o título “Anais do Instituto de Psiquiatria”, sem periodicidade regular.