一种优化土工格栅布置以最大化条形基础承载力的新方法

IF 0.5 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Acta Geotechnica Slovenica Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.18690/actageotechslov.18.2.56-69.2022
M. R. Moghadam, Jahanpour Monfared, M. Parvizi
{"title":"一种优化土工格栅布置以最大化条形基础承载力的新方法","authors":"M. R. Moghadam, Jahanpour Monfared, M. Parvizi","doi":"10.18690/actageotechslov.18.2.56-69.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a new approach to optimizing the layout of the geogrid layers to achieve the maximum bearing capacity of the strip footing under different loading conditions (Vertical (V), Horizontal (H) and eccentric (M) loads) using a numerical method. To find the best location of the geogrid layers in the current method, the optimum depth of each layer is obtained separately, which was not considered in previous studies. The effects of parameters such as different loading combinations, numbers and layout of geogrid layers on the ultimate bearing capacity of the strip footing have been studied. The results of the analyses are plotted in the form of dimensionless graphs. For different loading combinations, the optimum layout and number of reinforcing layers have been determined. The results show that the presence of the reinforced layers, at the optimum layout, significantly increases the ultimate bearing capacity of the strip footing, especially in the V and VM loading conditions. The optimum number of geogrid layers was different for different loading conditions. Based on the analyses, 7, 4 and 4 geogrid layers were obtained as the optimum number of reinforcement layers for the V, VH and VM loading conditions, respectively. Also, it was found that the position of each layer depends on the number of layers. In this study, the position of the first layer from the foundation (u/B) was varied by increasing the number of reinforcement layers and the loading conditions. In the VM loading condition, the geogrid reinforcement effect on the bearing capacity is more prominent with respect to the VH loading conditions. The increase of the bearing capacity in the VM loading condition at the optimum layout of reinforcement (N = 4) is about 100 %, compared to the bearing capacity of the unreinforced soil.","PeriodicalId":50897,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica Slovenica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach to optimizing the geogrid layout to maximize the bearing capacity of strip footing\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Moghadam, Jahanpour Monfared, M. Parvizi\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/actageotechslov.18.2.56-69.2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents a new approach to optimizing the layout of the geogrid layers to achieve the maximum bearing capacity of the strip footing under different loading conditions (Vertical (V), Horizontal (H) and eccentric (M) loads) using a numerical method. To find the best location of the geogrid layers in the current method, the optimum depth of each layer is obtained separately, which was not considered in previous studies. The effects of parameters such as different loading combinations, numbers and layout of geogrid layers on the ultimate bearing capacity of the strip footing have been studied. The results of the analyses are plotted in the form of dimensionless graphs. For different loading combinations, the optimum layout and number of reinforcing layers have been determined. The results show that the presence of the reinforced layers, at the optimum layout, significantly increases the ultimate bearing capacity of the strip footing, especially in the V and VM loading conditions. The optimum number of geogrid layers was different for different loading conditions. Based on the analyses, 7, 4 and 4 geogrid layers were obtained as the optimum number of reinforcement layers for the V, VH and VM loading conditions, respectively. Also, it was found that the position of each layer depends on the number of layers. In this study, the position of the first layer from the foundation (u/B) was varied by increasing the number of reinforcement layers and the loading conditions. In the VM loading condition, the geogrid reinforcement effect on the bearing capacity is more prominent with respect to the VH loading conditions. The increase of the bearing capacity in the VM loading condition at the optimum layout of reinforcement (N = 4) is about 100 %, compared to the bearing capacity of the unreinforced soil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica Slovenica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica Slovenica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/actageotechslov.18.2.56-69.2022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/actageotechslov.18.2.56-69.2022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种采用数值方法优化土工格栅层布置的新方法,以实现不同荷载条件下(垂直(V)、水平(H)和偏心(M)荷载下条形基础的最大承载能力。为了找到土工格栅各层的最佳位置,目前的方法是分别获得各层的最佳深度,这在以往的研究中没有考虑到。研究了不同荷载组合、土工格栅层数及布设等参数对条形基础极限承载力的影响。分析结果以无量纲图的形式绘制出来。针对不同的荷载组合,确定了最优的配筋布置和配筋层数。结果表明:在优化布置下,加筋层的存在显著提高了条形基础的极限承载力,特别是在V和VM加载条件下;不同荷载条件下,土工格栅的最佳层数不同。通过分析,得出V、VH和VM加载条件下,土工格栅的最佳配筋层数分别为7层、4层和4层。此外,还发现每层的位置取决于层数。在本研究中,第一层距基础的位置(u/B)随着加筋层数和加载条件的增加而变化。在VM加载条件下,土工格栅加固对承载力的影响相对于VH加载条件更为突出。最优配筋布置(N = 4)下VM加载条件下的承载力比未加筋土的承载力提高约100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new approach to optimizing the geogrid layout to maximize the bearing capacity of strip footing
This study presents a new approach to optimizing the layout of the geogrid layers to achieve the maximum bearing capacity of the strip footing under different loading conditions (Vertical (V), Horizontal (H) and eccentric (M) loads) using a numerical method. To find the best location of the geogrid layers in the current method, the optimum depth of each layer is obtained separately, which was not considered in previous studies. The effects of parameters such as different loading combinations, numbers and layout of geogrid layers on the ultimate bearing capacity of the strip footing have been studied. The results of the analyses are plotted in the form of dimensionless graphs. For different loading combinations, the optimum layout and number of reinforcing layers have been determined. The results show that the presence of the reinforced layers, at the optimum layout, significantly increases the ultimate bearing capacity of the strip footing, especially in the V and VM loading conditions. The optimum number of geogrid layers was different for different loading conditions. Based on the analyses, 7, 4 and 4 geogrid layers were obtained as the optimum number of reinforcement layers for the V, VH and VM loading conditions, respectively. Also, it was found that the position of each layer depends on the number of layers. In this study, the position of the first layer from the foundation (u/B) was varied by increasing the number of reinforcement layers and the loading conditions. In the VM loading condition, the geogrid reinforcement effect on the bearing capacity is more prominent with respect to the VH loading conditions. The increase of the bearing capacity in the VM loading condition at the optimum layout of reinforcement (N = 4) is about 100 %, compared to the bearing capacity of the unreinforced soil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica Slovenica
Acta Geotechnica Slovenica 地学-工程:地质
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ACTA GEOTECHNICA SLOVENICA aims to play an important role in publishing high-quality, theoretical papers from important and emerging areas that will have a lasting impact on fundamental and practical aspects of geomechanics and geotechnical engineering. ACTA GEOTECHNICA SLOVENICA publishes papers from the following areas: soil and rock mechanics, engineering geology, environmental geotechnics, geosynthetic, geotechnical structures, numerical and analytical methods, computer modelling, optimization of geotechnical structures, field and laboratory testing. The journal is published twice a year.
期刊最新文献
Diametric splitting tests on unsaturated expansive soil with different dry densities based on particle image velocimetry technique A framework for the use of reliability methods in deep urban excavations analysis Threshold silt content dependency on particle morphology (shape and size) of granular materials: review with new evidence Small scale model test on lateral behaviors of pile group in loose silica sand Improved general slice method of limit equilibrium for slope stability analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1