工业化茶暴露牙釉质表面显微硬度的变化

Nayanna Lana Soares Fernandes, Ingrid Andrade Meira, J. Lavôr, Andressa Bezerra de Oliveira, F. C. Sampaio
{"title":"工业化茶暴露牙釉质表面显微硬度的变化","authors":"Nayanna Lana Soares Fernandes, Ingrid Andrade Meira, J. Lavôr, Andressa Bezerra de Oliveira, F. C. Sampaio","doi":"10.17765/1518-1243.2017V19N2P135-143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The erosion capacity of industrialized teas on the dental enamel is evaluated according to the percentage of dental surface hardness loss (%DHL), pH, acid titration and buffer capacity. Six types of industrialized teas, featuring different brands and tastes, were analyzed. Mineral water-Crystal® and Coca-Cola® were respectively the negative and positive controls. Measurements of pH and titration were prepared in triplicate, in a 50ml beverage. Buffer capacity was calculated on pH rates and acid titration for pH 7.0. Micro-hardness of enamel surface was evaluated prior to and after the erosive test. ANOVA and Pearson´s correlation tests at p<0.05 were employed to analyze data which, in turn, provided normal distribution. There was significant difference between the teas and controls in all variables (ANOVA, p<0.05). The pH of teas ranged between 2.25 (Black tea with lemon) and 3.39 (Matte with lemon). Highest rates for acid titration (2.05) and buffer capacity (8.30) occurred in Black tea with lemon. Highest %DHL rate occurred in Peach tea, whilst the lowest in Natural Matte tea. There was a statistically significant difference in %DHL for all teas when compared to negative control and %PMD of all types of tea was higher than that of positive control. There were significant co-relationships (p<0.05) between initial pH initial with acid titration and buffer capacity, and between %PMD and initial pH, acid titration and buffer capacity. Results showed that all teas had an erosive trait on the dental enamel, with intensity variation according to taste and composition.","PeriodicalId":30388,"journal":{"name":"Iniciacao Cientifica Cesumar","volume":"19 1","pages":"135-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ALTERAÇÃO DA MICRODUREZA SUPERFICIAL DO ESMALTE DENTÁRIO EXPOSTOS A CHÁS INDUSTRIALIZADOS\",\"authors\":\"Nayanna Lana Soares Fernandes, Ingrid Andrade Meira, J. Lavôr, Andressa Bezerra de Oliveira, F. C. Sampaio\",\"doi\":\"10.17765/1518-1243.2017V19N2P135-143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The erosion capacity of industrialized teas on the dental enamel is evaluated according to the percentage of dental surface hardness loss (%DHL), pH, acid titration and buffer capacity. Six types of industrialized teas, featuring different brands and tastes, were analyzed. Mineral water-Crystal® and Coca-Cola® were respectively the negative and positive controls. Measurements of pH and titration were prepared in triplicate, in a 50ml beverage. Buffer capacity was calculated on pH rates and acid titration for pH 7.0. Micro-hardness of enamel surface was evaluated prior to and after the erosive test. ANOVA and Pearson´s correlation tests at p<0.05 were employed to analyze data which, in turn, provided normal distribution. There was significant difference between the teas and controls in all variables (ANOVA, p<0.05). The pH of teas ranged between 2.25 (Black tea with lemon) and 3.39 (Matte with lemon). Highest rates for acid titration (2.05) and buffer capacity (8.30) occurred in Black tea with lemon. Highest %DHL rate occurred in Peach tea, whilst the lowest in Natural Matte tea. There was a statistically significant difference in %DHL for all teas when compared to negative control and %PMD of all types of tea was higher than that of positive control. There were significant co-relationships (p<0.05) between initial pH initial with acid titration and buffer capacity, and between %PMD and initial pH, acid titration and buffer capacity. Results showed that all teas had an erosive trait on the dental enamel, with intensity variation according to taste and composition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iniciacao Cientifica Cesumar\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"135-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iniciacao Cientifica Cesumar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17765/1518-1243.2017V19N2P135-143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iniciacao Cientifica Cesumar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17765/1518-1243.2017V19N2P135-143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据牙表面硬度损失百分比(%DHL)、pH值、酸滴定和缓冲能力来评价工业化茶叶对牙釉质的侵蚀能力。对六种不同品牌和口味的工业化茶叶进行了分析。矿泉水-水晶®和可口可乐®分别为阴性对照和阳性对照。在50ml的饮料中测量pH值和滴定,一式三份。根据pH值和pH 7.0的酸滴定计算缓冲容量。在腐蚀试验前后对牙釉质表面进行显微硬度评价。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Pearson相关检验(p<0.05)对数据进行分析,结果为正态分布。茶组与对照组在各变量上差异均有统计学意义(方差分析,p<0.05)。茶的pH值在2.25(柠檬红茶)和3.39(柠檬哑光茶)之间。柠檬红茶的酸滴定率最高(2.05),缓冲能力最高(8.30)。桃茶的DHL率最高,而天然哑光茶的DHL率最低。与阴性对照相比,所有茶的百分比DHL都有统计学上的显著差异,所有茶的百分比PMD都高于阳性对照。初始酸滴定pH值与缓冲容量、%PMD值与初始pH值、酸滴定值和缓冲容量呈显著相关(p<0.05)。结果表明,所有茶叶对牙釉质均有侵蚀作用,且侵蚀程度随口味和成分的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ALTERAÇÃO DA MICRODUREZA SUPERFICIAL DO ESMALTE DENTÁRIO EXPOSTOS A CHÁS INDUSTRIALIZADOS
The erosion capacity of industrialized teas on the dental enamel is evaluated according to the percentage of dental surface hardness loss (%DHL), pH, acid titration and buffer capacity. Six types of industrialized teas, featuring different brands and tastes, were analyzed. Mineral water-Crystal® and Coca-Cola® were respectively the negative and positive controls. Measurements of pH and titration were prepared in triplicate, in a 50ml beverage. Buffer capacity was calculated on pH rates and acid titration for pH 7.0. Micro-hardness of enamel surface was evaluated prior to and after the erosive test. ANOVA and Pearson´s correlation tests at p<0.05 were employed to analyze data which, in turn, provided normal distribution. There was significant difference between the teas and controls in all variables (ANOVA, p<0.05). The pH of teas ranged between 2.25 (Black tea with lemon) and 3.39 (Matte with lemon). Highest rates for acid titration (2.05) and buffer capacity (8.30) occurred in Black tea with lemon. Highest %DHL rate occurred in Peach tea, whilst the lowest in Natural Matte tea. There was a statistically significant difference in %DHL for all teas when compared to negative control and %PMD of all types of tea was higher than that of positive control. There were significant co-relationships (p<0.05) between initial pH initial with acid titration and buffer capacity, and between %PMD and initial pH, acid titration and buffer capacity. Results showed that all teas had an erosive trait on the dental enamel, with intensity variation according to taste and composition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Práticas pedagógicas musicais do ensino remoto emergencial nas escolas de Feira de Santana O compartilhamento de conhecimento pelos professores da APAE de Douradina, no período da pandemia Atuação dos agentes da educação na formulação do Novo Ensino Médio Um olhar sobre a saúde mental de educadores na rede pública de ensino A pesquisa em acervos digitais: um método possível em História da Educação
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1