神圣的火花和亚伯拉罕:一个主要的区别

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Louvain Studies Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2143/LS.40.3.3245490
M. Poorthuis
{"title":"神圣的火花和亚伯拉罕:一个主要的区别","authors":"M. Poorthuis","doi":"10.2143/LS.40.3.3245490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gavin'D'Costa defends the continuity of Nostra Aetate with centuries of ecclesiastical teaching. This may be true but any religion will emphasize continuity when it comes to authoritative documents. The genuine renewal of Nostra Aetate regarding the dialogue with Judaism and Islam tends to be ignored by considering these religions merely as divine sparks.","PeriodicalId":41540,"journal":{"name":"Louvain Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"249-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/LS.40.3.3245490","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divine sparks and Abraham: a major difference\",\"authors\":\"M. Poorthuis\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/LS.40.3.3245490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gavin'D'Costa defends the continuity of Nostra Aetate with centuries of ecclesiastical teaching. This may be true but any religion will emphasize continuity when it comes to authoritative documents. The genuine renewal of Nostra Aetate regarding the dialogue with Judaism and Islam tends to be ignored by considering these religions merely as divine sparks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Louvain Studies\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"249-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/LS.40.3.3245490\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Louvain Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/LS.40.3.3245490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Louvain Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/LS.40.3.3245490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加文·德·科斯塔用几个世纪的教会教导来捍卫诺斯特拉·埃泰特的连续性。这可能是真的,但任何宗教都会强调权威性文件的连续性。关于与犹太教和伊斯兰教对话的诺斯特拉·埃泰特的真正更新,往往被忽视,认为这些宗教仅仅是神圣的火花。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Divine sparks and Abraham: a major difference
Gavin'D'Costa defends the continuity of Nostra Aetate with centuries of ecclesiastical teaching. This may be true but any religion will emphasize continuity when it comes to authoritative documents. The genuine renewal of Nostra Aetate regarding the dialogue with Judaism and Islam tends to be ignored by considering these religions merely as divine sparks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Louvain Studies
Louvain Studies RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Review of the book Soul Friendship: A Practical Theology of Spiritual Direction, Adrian Charfield and Nigel Rooms, 2019] [Review of the book Context and Text: A Method for Liturgical Theology, K. W. Irwin, 2018] “I Exist in Believing”: Anthropology as a Theological and Emancipative Pursuit. A Response to Michael Banner The difficult but possible path towards forgiveness and reconciliation Developing A Theologically Self-Reflexive Critique With Comparative Theologians And The Sociological Analysis Of Pierre Bourdieu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1