在一个健康论坛上进行医学智慧和医疗知识的评估

H. Giessen
{"title":"在一个健康论坛上进行医学智慧和医疗知识的评估","authors":"H. Giessen","doi":"10.26650/sdsl2020-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web 2.0 is often referred to as ‘social’ or participatory. A genre of Web 2.0 to which this certainly applies is forums. Every user can take part in communication exchange and publish his or her knowledge, experience and his or her very own opinions. This study focuses on the genre of forums. I qualitatively (and according to discourse- or content-analytical criteria) analyzed the special features of such lay communication in the context of a specific forum. In terms of content, I am referring to a forum from Germany that deals with health issues. The aim was to examine how medical professionals and medical knowledge are valued. Since it is difficult to access exact numbers of users in the context of such a forum, I selected a specific website that appears in the list of the most visited websites, and that already has a special probability of being accessed due to its URL (hence the name): www.gesundheit.de (according to the legal notice, this forum is operated by Alliance Healthcare Germany, based in Frankfurt am Main). The topics were selected from posts published between December 2018 and April 2019. The contributions were transferred unchanged, i.e. including the orthographic and grammatical errors found in the original","PeriodicalId":53722,"journal":{"name":"Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur-Alman Dili ve Edebiyati Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zur Bewertung der Ärzteschaft und des medizinischen Wissens in einem Gesundheitsforum\",\"authors\":\"H. Giessen\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/sdsl2020-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Web 2.0 is often referred to as ‘social’ or participatory. A genre of Web 2.0 to which this certainly applies is forums. Every user can take part in communication exchange and publish his or her knowledge, experience and his or her very own opinions. This study focuses on the genre of forums. I qualitatively (and according to discourse- or content-analytical criteria) analyzed the special features of such lay communication in the context of a specific forum. In terms of content, I am referring to a forum from Germany that deals with health issues. The aim was to examine how medical professionals and medical knowledge are valued. Since it is difficult to access exact numbers of users in the context of such a forum, I selected a specific website that appears in the list of the most visited websites, and that already has a special probability of being accessed due to its URL (hence the name): www.gesundheit.de (according to the legal notice, this forum is operated by Alliance Healthcare Germany, based in Frankfurt am Main). The topics were selected from posts published between December 2018 and April 2019. The contributions were transferred unchanged, i.e. including the orthographic and grammatical errors found in the original\",\"PeriodicalId\":53722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur-Alman Dili ve Edebiyati Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur-Alman Dili ve Edebiyati Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/sdsl2020-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studien zur Deutschen Sprache und Literatur-Alman Dili ve Edebiyati Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/sdsl2020-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Web 2.0通常被称为“社会的”或参与性的。这当然适用于Web 2.0的一种类型是论坛。每个用户都可以参与交流,发表自己的知识、经验和自己的观点。本研究的重点是论坛的类型。我定性地(并根据话语或内容分析的标准)分析了特定论坛背景下这种外行交流的特点。就内容而言,我指的是来自德国的一个讨论健康问题的论坛。其目的是研究如何重视医学专业人员和医学知识。由于在这样一个论坛的背景下很难访问到确切的用户数量,所以我选择了一个特定的网站,它出现在访问量最大的网站列表中,并且由于其URL(因此得名)已经具有特殊的访问概率:www.gesundheit.de(根据法律通知,该论坛由Alliance Healthcare Germany运营,总部位于美因法兰克福)。这些主题选自2018年12月至2019年4月期间发布的帖子。稿件原封不动,包括原文中发现的拼写和语法错误
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zur Bewertung der Ärzteschaft und des medizinischen Wissens in einem Gesundheitsforum
Web 2.0 is often referred to as ‘social’ or participatory. A genre of Web 2.0 to which this certainly applies is forums. Every user can take part in communication exchange and publish his or her knowledge, experience and his or her very own opinions. This study focuses on the genre of forums. I qualitatively (and according to discourse- or content-analytical criteria) analyzed the special features of such lay communication in the context of a specific forum. In terms of content, I am referring to a forum from Germany that deals with health issues. The aim was to examine how medical professionals and medical knowledge are valued. Since it is difficult to access exact numbers of users in the context of such a forum, I selected a specific website that appears in the list of the most visited websites, and that already has a special probability of being accessed due to its URL (hence the name): www.gesundheit.de (according to the legal notice, this forum is operated by Alliance Healthcare Germany, based in Frankfurt am Main). The topics were selected from posts published between December 2018 and April 2019. The contributions were transferred unchanged, i.e. including the orthographic and grammatical errors found in the original
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Yeni Almanca Öğretmenliği Lisans Programının Ana Öğretim Yeterliliklerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi Angstzustände im Fremdsprachenunterricht von Studierenden der Abteilung Deutsch als Fremdsprache auf Lehramt (Am Beispiel Anadolu Universität) Olimpia, Frankenstein’ın Yaratığı ve Diğerleri: Posthümanizmin Yazınsal Kaynakları Kultur der türkischen Diaspora in Deutschland und ihre Implementierung im Germanistikstudium. Ein praxisorientierter Blick aus Polen Christentum und Islam als Gegenpositionen rechtspopulistischer Identitätsstiftung. Bemerkungen zum Religionsdiskurs der AfD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1