就向道德操守委员会提出的多次惩罚同一罪行的成员请求可否受理的法律意见

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.31268/ps.2022.155
Piotr Chybalski
{"title":"就向道德操守委员会提出的多次惩罚同一罪行的成员请求可否受理的法律意见","authors":"Piotr Chybalski","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the opinion is to analyse the problem of admissibility of repeated submission to the Deputies’ Ethics Committee of motions to punish a deputy for the same act in breach of the “Principles of Deputies’ Ethics”. The author claims that once the Committee has adopted a resolution stating the violation of the above principles by a deputy, the submission of subsequent motions concerning the same case becomes groundless. This is because the provisions of the law do not give the Deputies’ Ethics Committee the possibility to return to the already-settled case.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":"4658 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinia prawna w sprawie dopuszczalności wielokrotnego składania do Komisji Etyki Poselskiej wniosków o ukaranie posła za to samo przewinienie\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Chybalski\",\"doi\":\"10.31268/ps.2022.155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of the opinion is to analyse the problem of admissibility of repeated submission to the Deputies’ Ethics Committee of motions to punish a deputy for the same act in breach of the “Principles of Deputies’ Ethics”. The author claims that once the Committee has adopted a resolution stating the violation of the above principles by a deputy, the submission of subsequent motions concerning the same case becomes groundless. This is because the provisions of the law do not give the Deputies’ Ethics Committee the possibility to return to the already-settled case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"volume\":\"4658 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该意见的主题是分析多次向代表道德委员会提交关于处罚违反“代表道德原则”的同一行为的代表的动议的可接受性问题。发件人声称,一旦委员会通过一项决议,指出一名代表违反了上述原则,随后就同一案件提出的动议就变得毫无根据。这是因为法律规定没有赋予议员道德委员会回到已经解决的案件的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Opinia prawna w sprawie dopuszczalności wielokrotnego składania do Komisji Etyki Poselskiej wniosków o ukaranie posła za to samo przewinienie
The subject of the opinion is to analyse the problem of admissibility of repeated submission to the Deputies’ Ethics Committee of motions to punish a deputy for the same act in breach of the “Principles of Deputies’ Ethics”. The author claims that once the Committee has adopted a resolution stating the violation of the above principles by a deputy, the submission of subsequent motions concerning the same case becomes groundless. This is because the provisions of the law do not give the Deputies’ Ethics Committee the possibility to return to the already-settled case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Nowa Zelandia: Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 21 listopada 2022 r. w sprawie Make It 16 Incorporated vs. Attorney-General (dotyczący wieku uprawniającego do głosowania w wyborach), sygn. akt SC 14/2022 Dopuszczalność odwołania od uchwał Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa w sprawach przeniesienia sędziego do innego wydziału Posłanka Wanda Ładzina (1880–1966) i jej działalność w Polsce i we Francji Uczestnictwo Sejmu i Senatu w procedurze kontroli przestrzegania zasady subsydiarności a przyszłość parlamentów narodowych w procesach decyzyjnych Unii Europejskiej Uzasadnienie orzeczeń sądowych – wybrane problemy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1