索绪尔,breal和意义问题

Dayanne Teixeira Lima
{"title":"索绪尔,breal和意义问题","authors":"Dayanne Teixeira Lima","doi":"10.28998/2317-9945.2019V1N62P255-275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sabe-se que Ferdinand de Saussure foi contemporâneo de Michel Breal. No entanto, um fato minimamente curioso e o da ausencia de uma discussao sobre as ideias de Breal na teorizacao de Saussure. Partindo desse pressuposto, o presente trabalho, de natureza teorica, tem o objetivo de discutir alguns aspectos da reflexao desses autores acerca do sentido , com o intuito de problematizarmos o \"silencio\" saussuriano em relacao as ideias do mestre frances. Para abordarmos a teorizacao saussuriana, partiremos de sua obra postuma, o Curso de linguistica geral , de 1916, e dos manuscritos reunidos e publicados, em 2002, por Simon Bouquet e Rudolf Engler nos Escritos de linguistica geral ; ja a perspectiva brealiana sera abordada a partir de seu Ensaio de semântica , publicado em 1897. Parece-nos que o estatuto necessariamente sincronico do signo , proposto por Saussure a partir da oposicao sincronia / diacronia , desautoriza a possibilidade de uma abordagem historica do sentido, tal como propos Breal. Saussure, Breal and the issue of the meaning It is known that Ferdinand de Saussure was a contemporary of Michel Breal. However, a minimally curious fact is the absence of a discussion of Breal's ideas in Saussure's theorizing. Based on this assumption, the present work, of a theoretical nature, has the objective of discussing some aspects of the reflection of these authors about the meaning, in order to problematize the saussurian \"silence\" in relation to the french master ideas. In order to approach Saussurian theorization, we will start with his posthumous work, the General Linguistics Course of 1916, and the manuscripts collected and published in 2002 by Simon Bouquet and Rudolf Engler in the Writings in General Linguistics ; the brealian perspective will be approached from his Semantic Essay , published in 1897. It seems to us that the necessarily synchronic status of the sign, proposed by Saussure from the synchrony/diacrony opposition, deters the possibility of a historical approach to meaning, as Breal proposed. Keywords: Saussure. Breal. Meaning. Synchrony and Diacrony DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p255-275","PeriodicalId":33154,"journal":{"name":"Leitura","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Saussure, Bréal e a questão do sentido\",\"authors\":\"Dayanne Teixeira Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.28998/2317-9945.2019V1N62P255-275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sabe-se que Ferdinand de Saussure foi contemporâneo de Michel Breal. No entanto, um fato minimamente curioso e o da ausencia de uma discussao sobre as ideias de Breal na teorizacao de Saussure. Partindo desse pressuposto, o presente trabalho, de natureza teorica, tem o objetivo de discutir alguns aspectos da reflexao desses autores acerca do sentido , com o intuito de problematizarmos o \\\"silencio\\\" saussuriano em relacao as ideias do mestre frances. Para abordarmos a teorizacao saussuriana, partiremos de sua obra postuma, o Curso de linguistica geral , de 1916, e dos manuscritos reunidos e publicados, em 2002, por Simon Bouquet e Rudolf Engler nos Escritos de linguistica geral ; ja a perspectiva brealiana sera abordada a partir de seu Ensaio de semântica , publicado em 1897. Parece-nos que o estatuto necessariamente sincronico do signo , proposto por Saussure a partir da oposicao sincronia / diacronia , desautoriza a possibilidade de uma abordagem historica do sentido, tal como propos Breal. Saussure, Breal and the issue of the meaning It is known that Ferdinand de Saussure was a contemporary of Michel Breal. However, a minimally curious fact is the absence of a discussion of Breal's ideas in Saussure's theorizing. Based on this assumption, the present work, of a theoretical nature, has the objective of discussing some aspects of the reflection of these authors about the meaning, in order to problematize the saussurian \\\"silence\\\" in relation to the french master ideas. In order to approach Saussurian theorization, we will start with his posthumous work, the General Linguistics Course of 1916, and the manuscripts collected and published in 2002 by Simon Bouquet and Rudolf Engler in the Writings in General Linguistics ; the brealian perspective will be approached from his Semantic Essay , published in 1897. It seems to us that the necessarily synchronic status of the sign, proposed by Saussure from the synchrony/diacrony opposition, deters the possibility of a historical approach to meaning, as Breal proposed. Keywords: Saussure. Breal. Meaning. Synchrony and Diacrony DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p255-275\",\"PeriodicalId\":33154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leitura\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leitura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28998/2317-9945.2019V1N62P255-275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leitura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28998/2317-9945.2019V1N62P255-275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

费迪南德·德·索索是米歇尔·布雷尔的同时代人。然而,一个非常奇怪的事实是,在索绪尔的理论中没有对布雷尔的思想进行讨论。基于这一假设,本文的理论性质旨在探讨这些作者对意义的反思的一些方面,以质疑索绪尔关于弗朗西丝大师思想的“沉默”。为了探讨索绪尔的理论,我们将从他1916年的著作《一般语言学课程》(postuma)和2002年西蒙·花束和鲁道夫·恩格勒(Simon Bouquet)收集并出版的《一般语言学著作》手稿开始;布雷利亚的观点将从他1897年发表的《语义学》文章中进行探讨。在我们看来,索绪尔从同步性/历时性的对立中提出的符号的必然同步性地位,否定了布雷尔所提出的意义的历史方法的可能性。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,该镇的土地面积为,其中土地面积为。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为。在这个假设的基础上,目前的工作,一个理论性质,有一个目的来讨论这些作者关于意义的反思的某些方面,以便质疑索索里安的“沉默”与法国大师的思想。为了研究索萨里的理论,我们将从他的著作《1916年一般语言学课程》开始,以及西蒙·布奎特和鲁道夫·恩格勒于2002年在一般语言学著作中收集和出版的手稿;brealian角度will be approached从语义的文章,发表在1897年。似乎对我们的necessarily synchronic状态的标志,提出了索绪尔synchrony / diacrony反对派的可能性,deters Breal提出的历史意义,方法。关键词:索绪尔。Breal。形式主义。他的父亲是一名律师,母亲是一名律师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Saussure, Bréal e a questão do sentido
Sabe-se que Ferdinand de Saussure foi contemporâneo de Michel Breal. No entanto, um fato minimamente curioso e o da ausencia de uma discussao sobre as ideias de Breal na teorizacao de Saussure. Partindo desse pressuposto, o presente trabalho, de natureza teorica, tem o objetivo de discutir alguns aspectos da reflexao desses autores acerca do sentido , com o intuito de problematizarmos o "silencio" saussuriano em relacao as ideias do mestre frances. Para abordarmos a teorizacao saussuriana, partiremos de sua obra postuma, o Curso de linguistica geral , de 1916, e dos manuscritos reunidos e publicados, em 2002, por Simon Bouquet e Rudolf Engler nos Escritos de linguistica geral ; ja a perspectiva brealiana sera abordada a partir de seu Ensaio de semântica , publicado em 1897. Parece-nos que o estatuto necessariamente sincronico do signo , proposto por Saussure a partir da oposicao sincronia / diacronia , desautoriza a possibilidade de uma abordagem historica do sentido, tal como propos Breal. Saussure, Breal and the issue of the meaning It is known that Ferdinand de Saussure was a contemporary of Michel Breal. However, a minimally curious fact is the absence of a discussion of Breal's ideas in Saussure's theorizing. Based on this assumption, the present work, of a theoretical nature, has the objective of discussing some aspects of the reflection of these authors about the meaning, in order to problematize the saussurian "silence" in relation to the french master ideas. In order to approach Saussurian theorization, we will start with his posthumous work, the General Linguistics Course of 1916, and the manuscripts collected and published in 2002 by Simon Bouquet and Rudolf Engler in the Writings in General Linguistics ; the brealian perspective will be approached from his Semantic Essay , published in 1897. It seems to us that the necessarily synchronic status of the sign, proposed by Saussure from the synchrony/diacrony opposition, deters the possibility of a historical approach to meaning, as Breal proposed. Keywords: Saussure. Breal. Meaning. Synchrony and Diacrony DOI: 10.28998/2317-9945.2019v1n62p255-275
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Primaverar: semear escritas e leituras e colher encontros Apresentação Leitura multimodal e o processo de construção de sentido em charges A literariedade do discurso platônico: uma análise cenográfica da República I (327a a 331d) Estratégias de leitura e Literatura Infantil: uma proposta de atividade prática com uso do livro Menina bonita do laço de fita
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1