欧洲人权标准

Q3 Social Sciences Informatologia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.32914/i.55.1-2.3
O. Barabash, Kateryna Dobkina, S. Senyk, Yevgeniya Klyuyeva, Alina S. Martiuk
{"title":"欧洲人权标准","authors":"O. Barabash, Kateryna Dobkina, S. Senyk, Yevgeniya Klyuyeva, Alina S. Martiuk","doi":"10.32914/i.55.1-2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the need to bring Ukrainian law in line with the norms and principles of international law, it is important to study European legal experience and European legal doctrine. The purpose of the article is to study the current problems of using the legal positions of the ECtHR in the decisions of Ukrainian courts. The study found that despite the legal consolidation of the status of ECtHR decisions as a source of law in Ukraine, the reasons that hinder the proper application of ECtHR practice are the lack of a systematic and well-established methodology for motivating court decisions using effective interpretative interpretation of ECtHR on specific decisions.The need to develop practical recommendations and methods of direct use of the practice of the Strasbourg court in the decisions of Ukrainian courts is pointed out. The methodological basis of the study is a dialectical method of cognition, which allows to explore problems in the unity of their social content and legal form, logical-semantic method, method of synthesis, system-structural method, sociological and statistical method and others. The practical significance of the obtained results is determined by the ability to increase the role of ECtHR decisions in ensuring human and civil rights in a democratic society.","PeriodicalId":35333,"journal":{"name":"Informatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European human rights standards\",\"authors\":\"O. Barabash, Kateryna Dobkina, S. Senyk, Yevgeniya Klyuyeva, Alina S. Martiuk\",\"doi\":\"10.32914/i.55.1-2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given the need to bring Ukrainian law in line with the norms and principles of international law, it is important to study European legal experience and European legal doctrine. The purpose of the article is to study the current problems of using the legal positions of the ECtHR in the decisions of Ukrainian courts. The study found that despite the legal consolidation of the status of ECtHR decisions as a source of law in Ukraine, the reasons that hinder the proper application of ECtHR practice are the lack of a systematic and well-established methodology for motivating court decisions using effective interpretative interpretation of ECtHR on specific decisions.The need to develop practical recommendations and methods of direct use of the practice of the Strasbourg court in the decisions of Ukrainian courts is pointed out. The methodological basis of the study is a dialectical method of cognition, which allows to explore problems in the unity of their social content and legal form, logical-semantic method, method of synthesis, system-structural method, sociological and statistical method and others. The practical significance of the obtained results is determined by the ability to increase the role of ECtHR decisions in ensuring human and civil rights in a democratic society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32914/i.55.1-2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32914/i.55.1-2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于需要使乌克兰法律符合国际法的规范和原则,重要的是要研究欧洲的法律经验和欧洲的法律学说。本文的目的是研究目前在乌克兰法院的判决中使用欧洲人权法院法律立场的问题。研究发现,尽管欧洲人权法院判决在乌克兰作为法律渊源的地位在法律上得到了巩固,但阻碍欧洲人权法院实践的适当适用的原因是缺乏一种系统和完善的方法,无法利用对欧洲人权法院对具体判决的有效解释性解释来推动法院作出判决。有人指出,有必要制定切实可行的建议和方法,以便在乌克兰法院的判决中直接使用斯特拉斯堡法院的做法。研究的方法论基础是辩证的认识法,从社会内容和法律形式的统一出发,运用逻辑语义方法、综合方法、系统结构方法、社会学和统计学方法等对问题进行探讨。所取得成果的实际意义取决于能否加强欧洲人权委员会的决定在确保民主社会中的人权和公民权利方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
European human rights standards
Given the need to bring Ukrainian law in line with the norms and principles of international law, it is important to study European legal experience and European legal doctrine. The purpose of the article is to study the current problems of using the legal positions of the ECtHR in the decisions of Ukrainian courts. The study found that despite the legal consolidation of the status of ECtHR decisions as a source of law in Ukraine, the reasons that hinder the proper application of ECtHR practice are the lack of a systematic and well-established methodology for motivating court decisions using effective interpretative interpretation of ECtHR on specific decisions.The need to develop practical recommendations and methods of direct use of the practice of the Strasbourg court in the decisions of Ukrainian courts is pointed out. The methodological basis of the study is a dialectical method of cognition, which allows to explore problems in the unity of their social content and legal form, logical-semantic method, method of synthesis, system-structural method, sociological and statistical method and others. The practical significance of the obtained results is determined by the ability to increase the role of ECtHR decisions in ensuring human and civil rights in a democratic society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informatologia
Informatologia Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: INFORMATOLOGIA is scientific journal which is dealing with general and specific problems in scientific field of Information Science. INFORMATOLOGIA publishes scientific and professional papers from information and communication sciences, which are refering to theory, technology and praxis of information and communication, education, communication science, journalism, public relations, media and visual communication, organisation and translotology and papers from related scientific fields. INFORMATOLOGIA is beeing published over thirty years and it gathers prominent experts in field of Information and Communication Science. The journal is published four times a year and it publishes scientific papers.
期刊最新文献
Metodika rada na primjeru razvijanja pojmova Open-Source Information – the Basis for Business Intelligence (BI) Revitalization of Osijek’s Forgotten Industrial Heritage as a Potential for the Development of Cultural and Creative Industries Library of the Royal Grammar School in Osijek from 1851/52 to 1929 The experience of european countries regarding the effective functioning of local governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1