{"title":"宗教与政治——冰岛的实验","authors":"Pétur Pétursson","doi":"10.33356/TEMENOS.46253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a comment on Richard F. Tomasson’s 1980 book about Iceland, the American sociologist Seymour Martin Lipset notes that Tomasson ‘traces the ways in which Icelandic culture developed out of the medieval pre-Christian society – in its language, relations between the sexes, egalitarianism and the high frequency of illegitimate births. He also points out the areas of contradictions and discontinuity, noting that Iceland has been transformed in the twentieth century by modernization of the society and international influences upon the culture.’ The purpose of this essay is to give a more in-depth analysis of some of Tomasson’s observations with regard to the status and role of religion in this society. Iceland appears to be a very secular society, but up to very recent times, the national church had a strong position in Icelandic society, and its participation in the life-rituals of families, in national festivals, and in local rituals and festivities has been considered self-evident by the authorities and a large majority of the people. A very homogeneous culture and strong nationalism have a role here to play, but there were also seeds of individualism and pragmatism which may have led the way to differentiation and secularization. Secularization and modernization went hand in hand with the national liberation movement, but nevertheless the national church also made a major contribution to the nation-state building process. It would seem that the Icelanders have throughout their history been more political than religious – and often they seem to have been tolerant in religious and moral issues but fundamentalists in political matters. At least it seems profitable to analyse the reli- gious history of Iceland – the conversion of Iceland at the Alþingi in the summer of 1000; the Reformation in the mid-16th century, and the rapid process of modernization in Iceland – in the context of the political history. Foreigners have often wondered about the liberal attitude of Icelanders in relation to premarital sex, and often they ask why spiritualism and belief in elves and hidden people seem to have survived modernization and secularization. Other possible paradoxes include the very recent appearance of non-Christian religions, such as the Asa faith (which is supposed to revive the pre-Christian religion in Iceland), Islam and Buddhism. And how are we to understand the general support, even among the clergy, for same-sex marriages? In my essay I will try to contextualize these and related questions into an overall picture of the religious history of the Icelandic people.","PeriodicalId":43012,"journal":{"name":"TEMENOS","volume":"50 1","pages":"115-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religion and Politics – The Icelandic Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Pétur Pétursson\",\"doi\":\"10.33356/TEMENOS.46253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a comment on Richard F. Tomasson’s 1980 book about Iceland, the American sociologist Seymour Martin Lipset notes that Tomasson ‘traces the ways in which Icelandic culture developed out of the medieval pre-Christian society – in its language, relations between the sexes, egalitarianism and the high frequency of illegitimate births. He also points out the areas of contradictions and discontinuity, noting that Iceland has been transformed in the twentieth century by modernization of the society and international influences upon the culture.’ The purpose of this essay is to give a more in-depth analysis of some of Tomasson’s observations with regard to the status and role of religion in this society. Iceland appears to be a very secular society, but up to very recent times, the national church had a strong position in Icelandic society, and its participation in the life-rituals of families, in national festivals, and in local rituals and festivities has been considered self-evident by the authorities and a large majority of the people. A very homogeneous culture and strong nationalism have a role here to play, but there were also seeds of individualism and pragmatism which may have led the way to differentiation and secularization. Secularization and modernization went hand in hand with the national liberation movement, but nevertheless the national church also made a major contribution to the nation-state building process. It would seem that the Icelanders have throughout their history been more political than religious – and often they seem to have been tolerant in religious and moral issues but fundamentalists in political matters. At least it seems profitable to analyse the reli- gious history of Iceland – the conversion of Iceland at the Alþingi in the summer of 1000; the Reformation in the mid-16th century, and the rapid process of modernization in Iceland – in the context of the political history. Foreigners have often wondered about the liberal attitude of Icelanders in relation to premarital sex, and often they ask why spiritualism and belief in elves and hidden people seem to have survived modernization and secularization. Other possible paradoxes include the very recent appearance of non-Christian religions, such as the Asa faith (which is supposed to revive the pre-Christian religion in Iceland), Islam and Buddhism. And how are we to understand the general support, even among the clergy, for same-sex marriages? In my essay I will try to contextualize these and related questions into an overall picture of the religious history of the Icelandic people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEMENOS\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"115-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEMENOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.46253\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEMENOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.46253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
美国社会学家西摩·马丁·利普塞特(Seymour Martin Lipset)在评论理查德·f·托马森(Richard F. Tomasson) 1980年出版的关于冰岛的书时指出,托马森“追溯了冰岛文化从中世纪前基督教社会发展出来的方式——包括语言、两性关系、平等主义和高频率的私生子。”他还指出了矛盾和不连续性的领域,指出冰岛在20世纪由于社会现代化和国际对文化的影响而发生了变化。这篇文章的目的是对托马森关于宗教在这个社会中的地位和作用的一些观察进行更深入的分析。冰岛似乎是一个非常世俗的社会,但直到最近,国家教会在冰岛社会中占有强大的地位,它参与家庭生活仪式、国家节日、地方仪式和庆祝活动,这被当局和大多数人认为是不言而喻的。一种非常同质的文化和强烈的民族主义在这里发挥了作用,但也有个人主义和实用主义的种子,这可能导致了分化和世俗化。世俗化和现代化与民族解放运动齐头并进,但尽管如此,民族教会也为民族国家的建设进程作出了重大贡献。冰岛人在整个历史中似乎更倾向于政治而不是宗教——他们在宗教和道德问题上似乎往往是宽容的,但在政治问题上却是原教旨主义者。至少,分析冰岛的宗教历史似乎是有益的——公元1000年夏天,冰岛在阿尔伐林吉海峡皈依宗教;16世纪中期的宗教改革,以及冰岛快速的现代化进程——在政治史的背景下。外国人经常对冰岛人在婚前性行为方面的自由态度感到奇怪,他们经常问为什么通灵论和对精灵和隐身人的信仰似乎在现代化和世俗化中幸存下来。其他可能的矛盾包括最近出现的非基督教宗教,如亚撒信仰(据说它复兴了冰岛的前基督教)、伊斯兰教和佛教。我们该如何理解对同性婚姻的普遍支持,甚至是在神职人员中?在我的文章中,我将尝试将这些和相关的问题置于冰岛人民宗教历史的整体图景中。
In a comment on Richard F. Tomasson’s 1980 book about Iceland, the American sociologist Seymour Martin Lipset notes that Tomasson ‘traces the ways in which Icelandic culture developed out of the medieval pre-Christian society – in its language, relations between the sexes, egalitarianism and the high frequency of illegitimate births. He also points out the areas of contradictions and discontinuity, noting that Iceland has been transformed in the twentieth century by modernization of the society and international influences upon the culture.’ The purpose of this essay is to give a more in-depth analysis of some of Tomasson’s observations with regard to the status and role of religion in this society. Iceland appears to be a very secular society, but up to very recent times, the national church had a strong position in Icelandic society, and its participation in the life-rituals of families, in national festivals, and in local rituals and festivities has been considered self-evident by the authorities and a large majority of the people. A very homogeneous culture and strong nationalism have a role here to play, but there were also seeds of individualism and pragmatism which may have led the way to differentiation and secularization. Secularization and modernization went hand in hand with the national liberation movement, but nevertheless the national church also made a major contribution to the nation-state building process. It would seem that the Icelanders have throughout their history been more political than religious – and often they seem to have been tolerant in religious and moral issues but fundamentalists in political matters. At least it seems profitable to analyse the reli- gious history of Iceland – the conversion of Iceland at the Alþingi in the summer of 1000; the Reformation in the mid-16th century, and the rapid process of modernization in Iceland – in the context of the political history. Foreigners have often wondered about the liberal attitude of Icelanders in relation to premarital sex, and often they ask why spiritualism and belief in elves and hidden people seem to have survived modernization and secularization. Other possible paradoxes include the very recent appearance of non-Christian religions, such as the Asa faith (which is supposed to revive the pre-Christian religion in Iceland), Islam and Buddhism. And how are we to understand the general support, even among the clergy, for same-sex marriages? In my essay I will try to contextualize these and related questions into an overall picture of the religious history of the Icelandic people.