《国父、乌龟和房间里的大象:宗教科学研究的起源》

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION TEMENOS Pub Date : 2015-01-07 DOI:10.33356/TEMENOS.48457
I. S. Gilhus
{"title":"《国父、乌龟和房间里的大象:宗教科学研究的起源》","authors":"I. S. Gilhus","doi":"10.33356/TEMENOS.48457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theme of the present article is the quest for origins, founding fathers and the never-ending search for identity in the scientific study of religion. Because the quest for origins and for founding fathers is intertwined with the complex relationship to theology, theology is frequently made into the significant other. The elephant is a metaphor for the preoccupation with theology. The article discusses the longing for origins, and it discusses good fathers and bad fathers, and especially Max Muller’s contribution to the study of religion. It also takes up the new quest for historical origins as well as the quest for generative mechanisms of religion and asks why the study of religion needs the metaphysical boosts of origins. A permanent preoccupation with universal patterns in the study of religion, recent developments in science, contemporary processes of globalization, a renewed general interest in religion, a wish to control the field and the continuous struggle to be different from theology are pointed out as reasons for the never-ending quest for origins. The article suggests that it might be fruitful to let go of the preoccupation with theology, and further that grand-scale comparative studies and universal claims need to be matched by small-scale studies of religion on the ground and by embracing complexity and reflexivity.","PeriodicalId":43012,"journal":{"name":"TEMENOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Founding Fathers, Turtles and the Elephant in the Room: The Quest for Origins in the Scientific Study of Religion\",\"authors\":\"I. S. Gilhus\",\"doi\":\"10.33356/TEMENOS.48457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theme of the present article is the quest for origins, founding fathers and the never-ending search for identity in the scientific study of religion. Because the quest for origins and for founding fathers is intertwined with the complex relationship to theology, theology is frequently made into the significant other. The elephant is a metaphor for the preoccupation with theology. The article discusses the longing for origins, and it discusses good fathers and bad fathers, and especially Max Muller’s contribution to the study of religion. It also takes up the new quest for historical origins as well as the quest for generative mechanisms of religion and asks why the study of religion needs the metaphysical boosts of origins. A permanent preoccupation with universal patterns in the study of religion, recent developments in science, contemporary processes of globalization, a renewed general interest in religion, a wish to control the field and the continuous struggle to be different from theology are pointed out as reasons for the never-ending quest for origins. The article suggests that it might be fruitful to let go of the preoccupation with theology, and further that grand-scale comparative studies and universal claims need to be matched by small-scale studies of religion on the ground and by embracing complexity and reflexivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEMENOS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEMENOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.48457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEMENOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.48457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文的主题是在宗教科学研究中寻求起源、开国元勋和对身份的永无止境的探索。因为对起源和开国元勋的追求与神学的复杂关系交织在一起,神学经常被视为重要的他者。大象是对神学的执着的隐喻。本文讨论了对起源的渴望,讨论了好父亲和坏父亲,特别是马克思·穆勒对宗教研究的贡献。它还提出了对历史起源的新探索,以及对宗教生成机制的探索,并提出了为什么宗教研究需要起源的形而上学推动。宗教研究中对普遍模式的永久关注、科学的最新发展、当代全球化进程、对宗教重新产生的普遍兴趣、控制该领域的愿望以及与神学不同的持续斗争被指出是永无止境地寻求起源的原因。这篇文章表明,放弃对神学的关注可能会取得丰硕成果,进一步说,大规模的比较研究和普遍主张需要与小规模的实地宗教研究相匹配,并接受复杂性和反身性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Founding Fathers, Turtles and the Elephant in the Room: The Quest for Origins in the Scientific Study of Religion
The theme of the present article is the quest for origins, founding fathers and the never-ending search for identity in the scientific study of religion. Because the quest for origins and for founding fathers is intertwined with the complex relationship to theology, theology is frequently made into the significant other. The elephant is a metaphor for the preoccupation with theology. The article discusses the longing for origins, and it discusses good fathers and bad fathers, and especially Max Muller’s contribution to the study of religion. It also takes up the new quest for historical origins as well as the quest for generative mechanisms of religion and asks why the study of religion needs the metaphysical boosts of origins. A permanent preoccupation with universal patterns in the study of religion, recent developments in science, contemporary processes of globalization, a renewed general interest in religion, a wish to control the field and the continuous struggle to be different from theology are pointed out as reasons for the never-ending quest for origins. The article suggests that it might be fruitful to let go of the preoccupation with theology, and further that grand-scale comparative studies and universal claims need to be matched by small-scale studies of religion on the ground and by embracing complexity and reflexivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEMENOS
TEMENOS RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
10
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Echo of Creation Knowing, Being, and Doing Religion Pål Ketil Botvar, Ann Kristin Gresaker, and Olav Hovdelien (eds): Ingen Spøk – en studie av religion og humour Finnish Muslims’ Journey from an Invisible Minority to Public Partnerships Theory in the Interstices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1