科学的天篷:宗教、合法性和科学的魅力

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION TEMENOS Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.33356/TEMENOS.6939
James R. Lewis
{"title":"科学的天篷:宗教、合法性和科学的魅力","authors":"James R. Lewis","doi":"10.33356/TEMENOS.6939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academics usually think of religion as legitimating other social institutions. However, one often finds apologists appealing to the authority of science as a strategy for supporting the truths of their particular tradition. In a social environment where diverse religious claims compete with each other, it is probably inevitable that different groups seek alternate sources of legitimacy. Science is an attractive legitimator because of its prestige and because of the popular view of science as an objective arbiter of ‘truth’. After examining the notion of ‘legitimation strategies’ derived from Max Weber’s discussion of the legitimation of authority, the article analyzes the specific ways in which religious groups appeal to the authority of science.","PeriodicalId":43012,"journal":{"name":"TEMENOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Science Canopy: Religion, Legitimacy, and the Charisma of Science\",\"authors\":\"James R. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.33356/TEMENOS.6939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academics usually think of religion as legitimating other social institutions. However, one often finds apologists appealing to the authority of science as a strategy for supporting the truths of their particular tradition. In a social environment where diverse religious claims compete with each other, it is probably inevitable that different groups seek alternate sources of legitimacy. Science is an attractive legitimator because of its prestige and because of the popular view of science as an objective arbiter of ‘truth’. After examining the notion of ‘legitimation strategies’ derived from Max Weber’s discussion of the legitimation of authority, the article analyzes the specific ways in which religious groups appeal to the authority of science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEMENOS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEMENOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.6939\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEMENOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.6939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

学者们通常认为宗教使其他社会制度合法化。然而,人们经常发现辩护者诉诸科学权威,作为支持其特定传统真理的一种策略。在一个不同宗教主张相互竞争的社会环境中,不同的群体寻求替代的合法性来源可能是不可避免的。科学之所以具有吸引力,是因为它的威望,也因为人们普遍认为科学是“真理”的客观仲裁者。在考察了马克斯·韦伯关于权威合法性的讨论中衍生出的“合法化策略”概念之后,本文分析了宗教团体诉诸科学权威的具体方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Science Canopy: Religion, Legitimacy, and the Charisma of Science
Academics usually think of religion as legitimating other social institutions. However, one often finds apologists appealing to the authority of science as a strategy for supporting the truths of their particular tradition. In a social environment where diverse religious claims compete with each other, it is probably inevitable that different groups seek alternate sources of legitimacy. Science is an attractive legitimator because of its prestige and because of the popular view of science as an objective arbiter of ‘truth’. After examining the notion of ‘legitimation strategies’ derived from Max Weber’s discussion of the legitimation of authority, the article analyzes the specific ways in which religious groups appeal to the authority of science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEMENOS
TEMENOS RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
10
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Echo of Creation Knowing, Being, and Doing Religion Pål Ketil Botvar, Ann Kristin Gresaker, and Olav Hovdelien (eds): Ingen Spøk – en studie av religion og humour Finnish Muslims’ Journey from an Invisible Minority to Public Partnerships Theory in the Interstices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1