服务业对环境的影响建模,促进泰国的可持续发展

Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee, Y. Sawangdee
{"title":"服务业对环境的影响建模,促进泰国的可持续发展","authors":"Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee, Y. Sawangdee","doi":"10.3354/ESEP00169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to propose an indicator to assess and rank environmental problems caused by production within the services sector of Thailand. Factors used to calculate real benefit (defined as revenue for a sector, minus the environmental costs) included the costs of (1) natural resources materials, (2) energy and transportation, (3) fertilizer and pesticides, and (4) sanitary and similar services. The highest environmental cost in terms of natural resources materials and energy and transportation was in the service sector — hotels and places of lodging, while the highest environmental cost in terms of fertilizer and pesticides was in the service sector — personal services. The service sector — movie theaters had the highest environmental cost for sanitary and similar services. Overall, the service sector — real estate gained the highest real benefit, while the service sector — repair not classified elsewhere had the lowest real benefit. If Thailand were to use an indicator of environmental harm, especially within the services sector, it could help to formulate efficient policies and strategies for the country in 3 areas of development (social, economic, and environmental development).","PeriodicalId":40001,"journal":{"name":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","volume":"16 1","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling environmental impact of service sectors to promote sustainable development of Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee, Y. Sawangdee\",\"doi\":\"10.3354/ESEP00169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to propose an indicator to assess and rank environmental problems caused by production within the services sector of Thailand. Factors used to calculate real benefit (defined as revenue for a sector, minus the environmental costs) included the costs of (1) natural resources materials, (2) energy and transportation, (3) fertilizer and pesticides, and (4) sanitary and similar services. The highest environmental cost in terms of natural resources materials and energy and transportation was in the service sector — hotels and places of lodging, while the highest environmental cost in terms of fertilizer and pesticides was in the service sector — personal services. The service sector — movie theaters had the highest environmental cost for sanitary and similar services. Overall, the service sector — real estate gained the highest real benefit, while the service sector — repair not classified elsewhere had the lowest real benefit. If Thailand were to use an indicator of environmental harm, especially within the services sector, it could help to formulate efficient policies and strategies for the country in 3 areas of development (social, economic, and environmental development).\",\"PeriodicalId\":40001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"11-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究的目的是提出一个指标,以评估泰国服务部门内生产造成的环境问题并对其进行排名。用于计算实际效益(定义为一个部门的收入减去环境成本)的因素包括:(1)自然资源材料成本,(2)能源和运输成本,(3)肥料和农药成本,以及(4)卫生和类似服务成本。就自然资源、材料、能源和运输而言,环境成本最高的是服务部门-旅馆和住宿场所,而就肥料和农药而言,环境成本最高的是服务部门-个人服务。服务业——电影院的卫生和类似服务的环境成本最高。总体而言,服务业(房地产)获得了最高的实际效益,而服务业(未分类的其他行业)的实际效益最低。如果泰国使用环境危害指标,特别是在服务部门使用环境危害指标,将有助于在三个发展领域(社会、经济和环境发展)为该国制定有效的政策和战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling environmental impact of service sectors to promote sustainable development of Thailand
The objective of this research is to propose an indicator to assess and rank environmental problems caused by production within the services sector of Thailand. Factors used to calculate real benefit (defined as revenue for a sector, minus the environmental costs) included the costs of (1) natural resources materials, (2) energy and transportation, (3) fertilizer and pesticides, and (4) sanitary and similar services. The highest environmental cost in terms of natural resources materials and energy and transportation was in the service sector — hotels and places of lodging, while the highest environmental cost in terms of fertilizer and pesticides was in the service sector — personal services. The service sector — movie theaters had the highest environmental cost for sanitary and similar services. Overall, the service sector — real estate gained the highest real benefit, while the service sector — repair not classified elsewhere had the lowest real benefit. If Thailand were to use an indicator of environmental harm, especially within the services sector, it could help to formulate efficient policies and strategies for the country in 3 areas of development (social, economic, and environmental development).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: •provides a global stage for presenting, discussing and developing issues concerning ethics in science, environmental politics, and ecological and economic ethics •publishes accepted manuscripts rapidly •guarantees immediate world-wide visibility •is edited and produced by an experienced team
期刊最新文献
Justifying the Precautionary Principle as a political principle The Humanised Zoo: Decolonizing conservation education through a new narrative Ecotheology: environmental ethical view in water spring protection The role of 'Thoughtful Intelligence' in climate statesmanship Cognitive artifacts and human enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1