{"title":"TIAA或CREF","authors":"A. Reif","doi":"10.2307/40225067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faculty in 80 to 90 per cent of private colleges and universities, and in 40 per cent of public institutions, are eligible to participate in the Teachers Insurance and Annuity-College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAACREF) retirement program.1 To many contributors, the accumulation of funds in this program represents the main source of income during retirement. The choice of how to apportion one's contributions between TIAA and CREF is therefore a vital one.2 During my sixteen years of participation, I have not seen a simple, straightforward comparison of the longterm earning performances of TIAA and CREF. Certainly, the annual reports from TIAA-CREF have been helpful towards that goal. Nevertheless, neither I nor my colleagues have been able to make a direct comparison of the performances of TIAA and CREF from these reports. In order to make such a comparison, I present Table 1 based on data furnished to me by TIAA-CREF. This table has been checked for accuracy by TIAA-CREF.8 1 hope it will be very helpful to professionals who are as simple-minded in financial matters as I am. While it is true that the past may not be indicative of future performance, knowledge of the certain past seems vital for extrapolations into the uncertain future. The headings in Table 1 give the year in which monthly investments in TIAA and CREF were begun, starting on January 1. Column 1 gives the year at the end of which the net accumulated funds in TIAA and in CREF are compared. The basis for the comparison is that identical amounts have been paid into these two funds. Also, it is assumed that payments into the funds increase by 6 per cent each year, a reasonable estimate for the rate at which salaries increase from year to year. The body of the table gives the ratios of the funds accumulated in TIAA and in CREF. This ratio represents a direct comparison of the performance of the two","PeriodicalId":87494,"journal":{"name":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","volume":"64 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225067","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TIAA or CREF\",\"authors\":\"A. Reif\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40225067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Faculty in 80 to 90 per cent of private colleges and universities, and in 40 per cent of public institutions, are eligible to participate in the Teachers Insurance and Annuity-College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAACREF) retirement program.1 To many contributors, the accumulation of funds in this program represents the main source of income during retirement. The choice of how to apportion one's contributions between TIAA and CREF is therefore a vital one.2 During my sixteen years of participation, I have not seen a simple, straightforward comparison of the longterm earning performances of TIAA and CREF. Certainly, the annual reports from TIAA-CREF have been helpful towards that goal. Nevertheless, neither I nor my colleagues have been able to make a direct comparison of the performances of TIAA and CREF from these reports. In order to make such a comparison, I present Table 1 based on data furnished to me by TIAA-CREF. This table has been checked for accuracy by TIAA-CREF.8 1 hope it will be very helpful to professionals who are as simple-minded in financial matters as I am. While it is true that the past may not be indicative of future performance, knowledge of the certain past seems vital for extrapolations into the uncertain future. The headings in Table 1 give the year in which monthly investments in TIAA and CREF were begun, starting on January 1. Column 1 gives the year at the end of which the net accumulated funds in TIAA and in CREF are compared. The basis for the comparison is that identical amounts have been paid into these two funds. Also, it is assumed that payments into the funds increase by 6 per cent each year, a reasonable estimate for the rate at which salaries increase from year to year. The body of the table gives the ratios of the funds accumulated in TIAA and in CREF. This ratio represents a direct comparison of the performance of the two\",\"PeriodicalId\":87494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225067\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

80%至90%的私立大学和40%的公立机构的教师有资格参加教师保险和年金-大学退休股票基金(TIAACREF)退休计划对许多出资人来说,在这个计划中积累的资金代表了退休期间的主要收入来源。因此,如何在TIAA和CREF之间分配自己的贡献是一个至关重要的选择在我参与的16年里,我没有看到对TIAA和CREF的长期盈利表现进行简单、直接的比较。当然,TIAA-CREF的年度报告有助于实现这一目标。然而,我和我的同事都无法从这些报告中直接比较TIAA和CREF的表现。为了进行这样的比较,我根据TIAA-CREF提供给我的数据给出了表1。此表已由美国教师资格认证基金会(TIAA-CREF)检查过准确性。我希望它能对像我这样头脑简单的金融专业人士有所帮助。虽然过去可能不能预示未来的表现,但对过去的了解似乎对推断不确定的未来至关重要。表1的标题给出了从1月1日开始每月投资TIAA和CREF的年份。第1栏给出了年终TIAA和CREF的净累积资金的比较年份。进行比较的依据是向这两个基金支付了相同的数额。此外,还假定向这些基金支付的款项每年增加6%,这是对薪金每年增长速度的合理估计。表格的主体给出了累积在TIAA和CREF中的资金的比率。这个比率代表了对两者性能的直接比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TIAA or CREF
Faculty in 80 to 90 per cent of private colleges and universities, and in 40 per cent of public institutions, are eligible to participate in the Teachers Insurance and Annuity-College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAACREF) retirement program.1 To many contributors, the accumulation of funds in this program represents the main source of income during retirement. The choice of how to apportion one's contributions between TIAA and CREF is therefore a vital one.2 During my sixteen years of participation, I have not seen a simple, straightforward comparison of the longterm earning performances of TIAA and CREF. Certainly, the annual reports from TIAA-CREF have been helpful towards that goal. Nevertheless, neither I nor my colleagues have been able to make a direct comparison of the performances of TIAA and CREF from these reports. In order to make such a comparison, I present Table 1 based on data furnished to me by TIAA-CREF. This table has been checked for accuracy by TIAA-CREF.8 1 hope it will be very helpful to professionals who are as simple-minded in financial matters as I am. While it is true that the past may not be indicative of future performance, knowledge of the certain past seems vital for extrapolations into the uncertain future. The headings in Table 1 give the year in which monthly investments in TIAA and CREF were begun, starting on January 1. Column 1 gives the year at the end of which the net accumulated funds in TIAA and in CREF are compared. The basis for the comparison is that identical amounts have been paid into these two funds. Also, it is assumed that payments into the funds increase by 6 per cent each year, a reasonable estimate for the rate at which salaries increase from year to year. The body of the table gives the ratios of the funds accumulated in TIAA and in CREF. This ratio represents a direct comparison of the performance of the two
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Preliminary Report on the Bakke Case Faculty Evaluation of Administrators: The Experience of Brooklyn College. Who Is Part-Time in Academe?. Equality for Individuals or Equality for Groups: Implications of the Supreme Court Decision in the Manhart Case The Continuing Academic Crisis in West Germany: Perceptions and Imponderables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1