高校图书馆馆藏:影印与著作权法。

J. Stedman
{"title":"高校图书馆馆藏:影印与著作权法。","authors":"J. Stedman","doi":"10.2307/40225107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does the common, and academically important, practice of photocopying copyrighted materials and putting them on reserve for use by students constitute copyright infringement? The attention this question has received is exceeded only by the inconclusiveness of the answers. Some commentators are sure that it constitutes infringement; others are equally sure that it does not. The following comments attempt to search out the line between permissible and impermissible photocopying for such purposes, and to spell out the considerations that suggest permissibility in most instances. \"Reserves,\" for purposes of this discussion, are defined as selected writings made available to individual and successive students for educational purposes, subject to sharp time limitations and, usually, restrictions on physical removal from the library premises. The copyright issue does not arise except with respect to copyrighted materials that have been copied without the express or implied consent of the copyright owner. Nor is the present discussion concerned with libraries that are connected with commercial organizations, or the possible liability of persons other than the libraries or teachers for instance, students who engage in unauthorized photocopying on unsupervised copying machines (see Appendix A, section 108[f]). In short, we are concerned here only with the teacher or the library acting upon the teacher's request or on its own initiative who makes, or has made, the unauthorized copies in question and places them on reserve. Since such practice involves a \"copying\" within the meaning of the copyright law, it constitutes infringement (see Appendix A, section 106[l]) unless such use is permitted by section 107 or 108 of the Copyright Revision Act of 19761 (see Appendix A).","PeriodicalId":87494,"journal":{"name":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","volume":"64 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225107","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Library Reserves: Photocopying and the Copyright-Law.\",\"authors\":\"J. Stedman\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40225107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Does the common, and academically important, practice of photocopying copyrighted materials and putting them on reserve for use by students constitute copyright infringement? The attention this question has received is exceeded only by the inconclusiveness of the answers. Some commentators are sure that it constitutes infringement; others are equally sure that it does not. The following comments attempt to search out the line between permissible and impermissible photocopying for such purposes, and to spell out the considerations that suggest permissibility in most instances. \\\"Reserves,\\\" for purposes of this discussion, are defined as selected writings made available to individual and successive students for educational purposes, subject to sharp time limitations and, usually, restrictions on physical removal from the library premises. The copyright issue does not arise except with respect to copyrighted materials that have been copied without the express or implied consent of the copyright owner. Nor is the present discussion concerned with libraries that are connected with commercial organizations, or the possible liability of persons other than the libraries or teachers for instance, students who engage in unauthorized photocopying on unsupervised copying machines (see Appendix A, section 108[f]). In short, we are concerned here only with the teacher or the library acting upon the teacher's request or on its own initiative who makes, or has made, the unauthorized copies in question and places them on reserve. Since such practice involves a \\\"copying\\\" within the meaning of the copyright law, it constitutes infringement (see Appendix A, section 106[l]) unless such use is permitted by section 107 or 108 of the Copyright Revision Act of 19761 (see Appendix A).\",\"PeriodicalId\":87494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225107\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

复印受版权保护的材料,并将其保留给学生使用,这种常见且在学术上很重要的做法是否构成侵犯版权?这个问题所受到的关注只超过了答案的不确定性。一些评论家确信这构成了侵权;其他人也同样确信它不会。下面的评论试图找出允许和不允许的影印之间的界限,并阐明在大多数情况下允许的考虑因素。为了讨论的目的,“储备”被定义为为教育目的提供给个人和连续的学生的精选作品,受到严格的时间限制,通常是对图书馆场所的物理移动的限制。除了未经版权所有者明示或暗示同意而复制的受版权保护的材料外,不会出现版权问题。目前的讨论也不涉及与商业组织有关的图书馆,也不涉及图书馆或教师以外的人(例如,在无人监督的复印机上进行未经授权的复印的学生)可能承担的责任(见附录A,第108节[f])。简而言之,我们这里只关心教师或图书馆应教师的要求或主动地制作或已经制作了未经授权的问题副本并将其保留。由于这种做法涉及版权法意义上的“复制”,因此它构成侵权(见附录a,第106条[l]),除非这种使用是1971年版权修订法案第107或108条允许的(见附录a)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic Library Reserves: Photocopying and the Copyright-Law.
Does the common, and academically important, practice of photocopying copyrighted materials and putting them on reserve for use by students constitute copyright infringement? The attention this question has received is exceeded only by the inconclusiveness of the answers. Some commentators are sure that it constitutes infringement; others are equally sure that it does not. The following comments attempt to search out the line between permissible and impermissible photocopying for such purposes, and to spell out the considerations that suggest permissibility in most instances. "Reserves," for purposes of this discussion, are defined as selected writings made available to individual and successive students for educational purposes, subject to sharp time limitations and, usually, restrictions on physical removal from the library premises. The copyright issue does not arise except with respect to copyrighted materials that have been copied without the express or implied consent of the copyright owner. Nor is the present discussion concerned with libraries that are connected with commercial organizations, or the possible liability of persons other than the libraries or teachers for instance, students who engage in unauthorized photocopying on unsupervised copying machines (see Appendix A, section 108[f]). In short, we are concerned here only with the teacher or the library acting upon the teacher's request or on its own initiative who makes, or has made, the unauthorized copies in question and places them on reserve. Since such practice involves a "copying" within the meaning of the copyright law, it constitutes infringement (see Appendix A, section 106[l]) unless such use is permitted by section 107 or 108 of the Copyright Revision Act of 19761 (see Appendix A).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Preliminary Report on the Bakke Case Faculty Evaluation of Administrators: The Experience of Brooklyn College. Who Is Part-Time in Academe?. Equality for Individuals or Equality for Groups: Implications of the Supreme Court Decision in the Manhart Case The Continuing Academic Crisis in West Germany: Perceptions and Imponderables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1