监狱休假和诉诸司法:对丹麦和德国现行法律的一些见解

Christine Graebsch, A. Storgaard
{"title":"监狱休假和诉诸司法:对丹麦和德国现行法律的一些见解","authors":"Christine Graebsch, A. Storgaard","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we use the example of prison leave to discuss prisoners’ access to justice. Based on a functional comparative analysis between Denmark and Germany, we study the law in action. In Germany, prisoners have a legally prescribed right of access to the courts in cases of denial of prison leave. However, in Denmark prisoners face more barriers when trying to access the court. In our analysis, we have compared Danish court cases with letters from German prisoners referring to their struggles with prison administrations and courts. The materials from both countries show more similarities than one would expect, given the significant differences between the substantive law in the two jurisdictions. While acknowledging the need for further empirical investigation, we introduce a concept we term “genuine justice”, with the aim of paving the way for other and more radical remedies supplementing the economic, legal and social measures already in place.","PeriodicalId":36457,"journal":{"name":"Onati Socio-Legal Series","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prison leave and access to justice: Some insight into Danish and German law in action\",\"authors\":\"Christine Graebsch, A. Storgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we use the example of prison leave to discuss prisoners’ access to justice. Based on a functional comparative analysis between Denmark and Germany, we study the law in action. In Germany, prisoners have a legally prescribed right of access to the courts in cases of denial of prison leave. However, in Denmark prisoners face more barriers when trying to access the court. In our analysis, we have compared Danish court cases with letters from German prisoners referring to their struggles with prison administrations and courts. The materials from both countries show more similarities than one would expect, given the significant differences between the substantive law in the two jurisdictions. While acknowledging the need for further empirical investigation, we introduce a concept we term “genuine justice”, with the aim of paving the way for other and more radical remedies supplementing the economic, legal and social measures already in place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onati Socio-Legal Series\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onati Socio-Legal Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onati Socio-Legal Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们以监狱休假为例来讨论囚犯诉诸司法的途径。在对丹麦和德国的功能比较分析的基础上,我们研究了在行动中的法律。在德国,囚犯在被拒绝离开监狱的情况下有法律规定的向法院申诉的权利。然而,在丹麦,囚犯在试图进入法庭时面临更多障碍。在我们的分析中,我们将丹麦法庭案件与德国囚犯的信件进行了比较,这些囚犯提到他们与监狱管理部门和法院的斗争。鉴于两国实体法之间的重大差异,两国的材料显示出比人们预期的更多的相似之处。在承认需要进一步的实证调查的同时,我们提出了一个我们称之为“真正的正义”的概念,目的是为补充现有的经济、法律和社会措施的其他和更激进的补救办法铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prison leave and access to justice: Some insight into Danish and German law in action
In this article, we use the example of prison leave to discuss prisoners’ access to justice. Based on a functional comparative analysis between Denmark and Germany, we study the law in action. In Germany, prisoners have a legally prescribed right of access to the courts in cases of denial of prison leave. However, in Denmark prisoners face more barriers when trying to access the court. In our analysis, we have compared Danish court cases with letters from German prisoners referring to their struggles with prison administrations and courts. The materials from both countries show more similarities than one would expect, given the significant differences between the substantive law in the two jurisdictions. While acknowledging the need for further empirical investigation, we introduce a concept we term “genuine justice”, with the aim of paving the way for other and more radical remedies supplementing the economic, legal and social measures already in place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Onati Socio-Legal Series
Onati Socio-Legal Series Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking legal time: The temporal turn in socio-legal studies Engaging with court research: The case of French terror trials The concept of speed in Luhmann’s schemata: The case of the Russian criminal justice Two tiers of judicial officers El delito de violación en el Código Penal español: sombras e indefiniciones de la construcción político-jurídica del consentimiento sexual
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1