E. Jordanova, P. Hentova-Senćanić, I. Marjanović, Ivan Senčanin, Ivana Stefanović, M. Baralić
{"title":"角膜及测量眼压的方法","authors":"E. Jordanova, P. Hentova-Senćanić, I. Marjanović, Ivan Senčanin, Ivana Stefanović, M. Baralić","doi":"10.5937/sanamed0-41040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The study aimed to assert the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Materials and Methods: The study included 150 patients with a mean age of 59.39 ± 13.12 years. Patients were divided into three groups: 50 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, 50 ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, and 50 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. IOP was determined using GAT and DCT. CCT was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. Results: IOP measured with DCT was higher than IOP measured with GAT (19.80 ± 3.67 mmHg vs 17.71 ± 3.35 mmHg). A significant positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT was found in all patients (r = 0.867, p < 0.01). A significantly positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT in POAG (r = 0.855, p <0.01), OHT (r = 0.826, p < 0.01), and NTG patients (r = 0.832, p < 0.01) were found. A significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with GAT (r = 0.198, p < 0.01), as well as a significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with DCT was found (r = 0.198, p < 0.01) in all patients. There was no correlation between CCT and IOP measured neither with GAT nor with DCT separately in three patient groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CCT-influenced IOP was measured by both methods, GAT and DCT. DCT can not replace GAT, but it is very useful, especially in cases where errors are in the IOP GAT measurement.","PeriodicalId":53269,"journal":{"name":"Sanamed","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cornea and methods for measuring intraocular pressure\",\"authors\":\"E. Jordanova, P. Hentova-Senćanić, I. Marjanović, Ivan Senčanin, Ivana Stefanović, M. Baralić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/sanamed0-41040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The study aimed to assert the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Materials and Methods: The study included 150 patients with a mean age of 59.39 ± 13.12 years. Patients were divided into three groups: 50 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, 50 ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, and 50 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. IOP was determined using GAT and DCT. CCT was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. Results: IOP measured with DCT was higher than IOP measured with GAT (19.80 ± 3.67 mmHg vs 17.71 ± 3.35 mmHg). A significant positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT was found in all patients (r = 0.867, p < 0.01). A significantly positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT in POAG (r = 0.855, p <0.01), OHT (r = 0.826, p < 0.01), and NTG patients (r = 0.832, p < 0.01) were found. A significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with GAT (r = 0.198, p < 0.01), as well as a significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with DCT was found (r = 0.198, p < 0.01) in all patients. There was no correlation between CCT and IOP measured neither with GAT nor with DCT separately in three patient groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CCT-influenced IOP was measured by both methods, GAT and DCT. DCT can not replace GAT, but it is very useful, especially in cases where errors are in the IOP GAT measurement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sanamed\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sanamed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/sanamed0-41040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanamed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/sanamed0-41040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
前言:本研究旨在确定角膜中央厚度(CCT)与眼压(IOP)之间的关系:Goldmann压平眼压(GAT)和动态等高线眼压(DCT)测量。材料与方法:纳入150例患者,平均年龄59.39±13.12岁。将患者分为3组:50例原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、50例高眼压(OHT)和50例正常张力型青光眼(NTG)。用GAT和DCT测定眼压。超声测厚法测定CCT。结果:DCT测量的IOP高于GAT测量的IOP(19.80±3.67 mmHg vs 17.71±3.35 mmHg)。GAT测量IOP与DCT测量IOP在所有患者中均有显著正相关(r = 0.867, p < 0.01)。POAG患者GAT测IOP与DCT测IOP呈正相关(r = 0.855, p 0.05)。结论:采用GAT和DCT两种方法测量cct对IOP的影响。DCT不能代替GAT,但它非常有用,特别是在IOP GAT测量存在误差的情况下。
The cornea and methods for measuring intraocular pressure
Introduction: The study aimed to assert the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Materials and Methods: The study included 150 patients with a mean age of 59.39 ± 13.12 years. Patients were divided into three groups: 50 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, 50 ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, and 50 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. IOP was determined using GAT and DCT. CCT was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. Results: IOP measured with DCT was higher than IOP measured with GAT (19.80 ± 3.67 mmHg vs 17.71 ± 3.35 mmHg). A significant positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT was found in all patients (r = 0.867, p < 0.01). A significantly positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT in POAG (r = 0.855, p <0.01), OHT (r = 0.826, p < 0.01), and NTG patients (r = 0.832, p < 0.01) were found. A significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with GAT (r = 0.198, p < 0.01), as well as a significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with DCT was found (r = 0.198, p < 0.01) in all patients. There was no correlation between CCT and IOP measured neither with GAT nor with DCT separately in three patient groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CCT-influenced IOP was measured by both methods, GAT and DCT. DCT can not replace GAT, but it is very useful, especially in cases where errors are in the IOP GAT measurement.