不相容的谈判作为腐败犯罪:典型的结构和归罪标准

Juan Pablo Mañalich Raffo
{"title":"不相容的谈判作为腐败犯罪:典型的结构和归罪标准","authors":"Juan Pablo Mañalich Raffo","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2015.38977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper defends a reconstruction of the wrongfulness of the so called “incompatible negotiation” under Chilean criminal law, which can be understood as an “abstract endangerment” offense against probity in the exercise of public service and thus constitutes a differentiated kind of criminal corruption. Upon a conception based on the so called “contractual metaphor”, the structure of the wrongdoing of the offense is analyzed, aiming towards its status as “special offense” as well as towards the precise definition of its wrongfulness core, which can be identified with the “interested” intervention of a public servant in a certain transaction or operation. In connection hereto, the specific conditions of subjective responsibility are reviewed, with regard both to mens rea and the awareness of unlawfulness.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"93-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La negociación incompatible como delito de corrupción: estructura típica y criterios de imputación\",\"authors\":\"Juan Pablo Mañalich Raffo\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/0718-4735.2015.38977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper defends a reconstruction of the wrongfulness of the so called “incompatible negotiation” under Chilean criminal law, which can be understood as an “abstract endangerment” offense against probity in the exercise of public service and thus constitutes a differentiated kind of criminal corruption. Upon a conception based on the so called “contractual metaphor”, the structure of the wrongdoing of the offense is analyzed, aiming towards its status as “special offense” as well as towards the precise definition of its wrongfulness core, which can be identified with the “interested” intervention of a public servant in a certain transaction or operation. In connection hereto, the specific conditions of subjective responsibility are reviewed, with regard both to mens rea and the awareness of unlawfulness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"93-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2015.38977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2015.38977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文为在智利刑法下对所谓“不相容谈判”的不法性进行重构辩护,这可以被理解为一种“抽象危害”公务廉洁的犯罪,从而构成一种不同的腐败犯罪。在所谓“契约隐喻”的概念基础上,分析了违法行为的结构,针对其作为“特殊犯罪”的地位以及其不法核心的精确定义,可以将其识别为公职人员对某一交易或操作的“利益”干预。在此基础上,从行为意图和违法意识两个方面对主观责任的具体条件进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La negociación incompatible como delito de corrupción: estructura típica y criterios de imputación
The paper defends a reconstruction of the wrongfulness of the so called “incompatible negotiation” under Chilean criminal law, which can be understood as an “abstract endangerment” offense against probity in the exercise of public service and thus constitutes a differentiated kind of criminal corruption. Upon a conception based on the so called “contractual metaphor”, the structure of the wrongdoing of the offense is analyzed, aiming towards its status as “special offense” as well as towards the precise definition of its wrongfulness core, which can be identified with the “interested” intervention of a public servant in a certain transaction or operation. In connection hereto, the specific conditions of subjective responsibility are reviewed, with regard both to mens rea and the awareness of unlawfulness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La sustracción de cosas corporales informes. El caso del agua, la electricidad y el gas Aproximaciones teóricas para una explicación de la violencia carcelaria interpersonal: un debate pendiente en el sistema penitenciario chileno Consideraciones acerca del tratamiento del error de prohibición en la jurisprudencia chilena ¿Es necesario un acuerdo en la coautoría? Una revisión crítica de acuerdo con la teoría de la acción El bien jurídico protegido como límite -aún posible- entre el derecho penal y el derecho administrativo sancionador: Reflexiones desde el derecho penal económico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1