亚里士多德与狄奥多鲁斯:谁赢了宿命论之争?

J. A. Barker, Thomas D. Paxson
{"title":"亚里士多德与狄奥多鲁斯:谁赢了宿命论之争?","authors":"J. A. Barker, Thomas D. Paxson","doi":"10.5840/PRA1985112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic (ASL), and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary ta prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logie and a fuB system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this ancient debate, but should prove t6 be q uite useful in application to contemporary issues.","PeriodicalId":82315,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy research archives (Bowling Green, Ohio : 1982)","volume":"52 1","pages":"41-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5840/PRA1985112","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aristotle vs. Diodorus: Who Won the Fatalism Debate?\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Barker, Thomas D. Paxson\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/PRA1985112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic (ASL), and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary ta prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logie and a fuB system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this ancient debate, but should prove t6 be q uite useful in application to contemporary issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy research archives (Bowling Green, Ohio : 1982)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"41-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5840/PRA1985112\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy research archives (Bowling Green, Ohio : 1982)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/PRA1985112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy research archives (Bowling Green, Ohio : 1982)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/PRA1985112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们开发了一个改进的标准逻辑系统,扩充标准逻辑(ASL),我们使用ASL来努力表明,与主流观点相反,亚里士多德和狄奥多鲁斯在他们著名的宿命论辩论中都提出了令人印象深刻的论点,具有有效的结构和高度可信的前提。我们认为,美国手语包含标准逻辑和由少量原语产生的模态和时间逻辑的完整系统,不仅应该使人们能够欣赏具有古代辩论特征的复杂哲学思想,而且应该证明它在应用于当代问题时是非常有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aristotle vs. Diodorus: Who Won the Fatalism Debate?
We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic (ASL), and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary ta prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logie and a fuB system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this ancient debate, but should prove t6 be q uite useful in application to contemporary issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Selective Conscientious Objection Medieval Arabic Poetics: Poetic Syllogism and Community in Avicenna’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Poetics Reichenbach and Smart on Temporal Discourse Ockham’s Razor and the Identity of Indiscernables A Critique of Kant’s Defense of Theistic Faith
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1