评估口头交流的新方法和不太新的方法

Q2 Arts and Humanities Language Value Pub Date : 2015-11-21 DOI:10.6035/LANGUAGEV.2015.7.2
G. Ockey, Zhi Li
{"title":"评估口头交流的新方法和不太新的方法","authors":"G. Ockey, Zhi Li","doi":"10.6035/LANGUAGEV.2015.7.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of oral communication has continued to evolve over the past few decades. The construct being assessed has broadened to include interactional competence, and technology has played a role in the types of tasks that are currently popular. In this paper, we discuss the factors that affect the process of oral communication assessment, current conceptualizations of the construct to be assessed, and five tasks that are used to assess this construct. These tasks include oral proficiency interviews, paired/group oral discussion tasks, simulated tasks, integrated oral communication tasks, and elicited imitation tasks. We evaluate these tasks based on current conceptualizations of the construct of oral communication, and conclude that they do not assess a broad construct of oral communication equally. Based on our evaluation, we advise test developers to consider the aspects of oral communication that they aim to include or exclude in their assessment when they select one of these task types.","PeriodicalId":36244,"journal":{"name":"Language Value","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New and not so new methods for assessing oral communication\",\"authors\":\"G. Ockey, Zhi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.6035/LANGUAGEV.2015.7.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assessment of oral communication has continued to evolve over the past few decades. The construct being assessed has broadened to include interactional competence, and technology has played a role in the types of tasks that are currently popular. In this paper, we discuss the factors that affect the process of oral communication assessment, current conceptualizations of the construct to be assessed, and five tasks that are used to assess this construct. These tasks include oral proficiency interviews, paired/group oral discussion tasks, simulated tasks, integrated oral communication tasks, and elicited imitation tasks. We evaluate these tasks based on current conceptualizations of the construct of oral communication, and conclude that they do not assess a broad construct of oral communication equally. Based on our evaluation, we advise test developers to consider the aspects of oral communication that they aim to include or exclude in their assessment when they select one of these task types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Value\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Value\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6035/LANGUAGEV.2015.7.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Value","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6035/LANGUAGEV.2015.7.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

在过去的几十年里,口头交流的评估一直在不断发展。正在评估的结构已经扩展到包括交互能力,并且技术在当前流行的任务类型中发挥了作用。在本文中,我们讨论了影响口头交际评估过程的因素,目前被评估的构念的概念,以及用于评估该构念的五个任务。这些任务包括口语水平访谈、配对/小组口语讨论任务、模拟任务、综合口语交流任务和诱导模仿任务。我们根据当前口头交际结构的概念来评估这些任务,并得出结论,它们并不能平等地评估广泛的口头交际结构。根据我们的评估,我们建议测试开发人员在选择这些任务类型之一时,考虑他们在评估中打算包括或排除的口头交流方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New and not so new methods for assessing oral communication
The assessment of oral communication has continued to evolve over the past few decades. The construct being assessed has broadened to include interactional competence, and technology has played a role in the types of tasks that are currently popular. In this paper, we discuss the factors that affect the process of oral communication assessment, current conceptualizations of the construct to be assessed, and five tasks that are used to assess this construct. These tasks include oral proficiency interviews, paired/group oral discussion tasks, simulated tasks, integrated oral communication tasks, and elicited imitation tasks. We evaluate these tasks based on current conceptualizations of the construct of oral communication, and conclude that they do not assess a broad construct of oral communication equally. Based on our evaluation, we advise test developers to consider the aspects of oral communication that they aim to include or exclude in their assessment when they select one of these task types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Value
Language Value Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pediatric Gender Identity: Gender-affirming care for Transgender & Gender Diverse Youth Eficàcia del model d'aprenentatge basat en projectes en llengua anglesa en educació superior: Un cas pràctic al grau de Turisme Objectius de desenvolupament sostenible i competències transversals mitjançant intercanvi virtual L2/3 English Language Proficiency and Career Opportunities: Perceptions of Indonesian University Graduates Recursos de valoración en textos promocionales hablados: Principiantes frente a profesionales del marketing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1