最大强度和高强度间歇训练对急性心肌梗死患者运动能力和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08094-2
Hoon Nam, Hyeong-Eun Jeon, Won-Hyoung Kim, Kyung-Lim Joa, Haneul Lee
{"title":"最大强度和高强度间歇训练对急性心肌梗死患者运动能力和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Hoon Nam, Hyeong-Eun Jeon, Won-Hyoung Kim, Kyung-Lim Joa, Haneul Lee","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08094-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increase in V̇O<inf>2max</inf> is important for acute myocardial infarction morbidity, and recurrence rate and intensity have been suggested as important factors in improving V̇O<inf>2max</inf>.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of maximal-intensity interval training (MIIT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on exercise capacity and health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) at low and moderate cardiac risk in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). This study secondarily aimed to compare the effects of hospital-based phase II CR and usual care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Fifty-nine patients with acute MI were randomly assigned to the MIIT (N.=30) or HIIT (N.=29) group, and 32 to the usual care group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twice a week, an intervention was conducted for nine weeks in all groups. The maximum oxygen intake (V̇O<inf>2max</inf>) and MacNew Heart Disease HRQoL were evaluated before and after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant interaction was observed between time and group for V̇O<inf>2max</inf> (P<0.001). The MIIT group showed greater improvement than those exhibited by the HIIT and usual care groups (P<0.05). Similarly, a significant time and group interaction was observed on the MacNew Global, Physical, and Emotional scales (P<0.05), but not on the social scale (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to HIIT and usual care, MIIT significantly increased the V̇O<inf>2max</inf> and was as safe as HIIT in patients with acute MI with low and moderate cardiac risk in CR. Additionally, MIIT and HIIT were superior to usual care in terms of improving the HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>Our results suggest that increased intensity in phase II CR could result in better outcomes in terms of V̇O<inf>2max</inf> increment in patients with acute MI and low and moderate cardiac risk in CR.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of maximal-intensity and high-intensity interval training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hoon Nam, Hyeong-Eun Jeon, Won-Hyoung Kim, Kyung-Lim Joa, Haneul Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08094-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increase in V̇O<inf>2max</inf> is important for acute myocardial infarction morbidity, and recurrence rate and intensity have been suggested as important factors in improving V̇O<inf>2max</inf>.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of maximal-intensity interval training (MIIT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on exercise capacity and health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) at low and moderate cardiac risk in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). This study secondarily aimed to compare the effects of hospital-based phase II CR and usual care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Fifty-nine patients with acute MI were randomly assigned to the MIIT (N.=30) or HIIT (N.=29) group, and 32 to the usual care group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twice a week, an intervention was conducted for nine weeks in all groups. The maximum oxygen intake (V̇O<inf>2max</inf>) and MacNew Heart Disease HRQoL were evaluated before and after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant interaction was observed between time and group for V̇O<inf>2max</inf> (P<0.001). The MIIT group showed greater improvement than those exhibited by the HIIT and usual care groups (P<0.05). Similarly, a significant time and group interaction was observed on the MacNew Global, Physical, and Emotional scales (P<0.05), but not on the social scale (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to HIIT and usual care, MIIT significantly increased the V̇O<inf>2max</inf> and was as safe as HIIT in patients with acute MI with low and moderate cardiac risk in CR. Additionally, MIIT and HIIT were superior to usual care in terms of improving the HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>Our results suggest that increased intensity in phase II CR could result in better outcomes in terms of V̇O<inf>2max</inf> increment in patients with acute MI and low and moderate cardiac risk in CR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08094-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08094-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:V̇O2max的升高对急性心肌梗死的发病率很重要,复发率和强度被认为是提高V \775 O2max水平的重要因素。目的:比较最大强度间歇训练(MIIT)和高强度间歇训练对心脏康复(CR)中低心脏风险急性心肌梗死(MI)患者运动能力和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。本研究的第二个目的是比较基于医院的II期CR和常规护理的效果。设计:本研究为随机对照试验。设置:门诊康复设置。人群:59名急性心肌梗死患者被随机分配到MIIT(N=30)或HIIT(N=29)组,32名被分配到常规护理组。方法:每周一次,对各组进行为期9周的干预。在干预前后评估最大摄氧量(V̇O2max)和MacNew心脏病HRQoL。结果:与常规治疗相比,MIIT显著提高了急性心肌梗死患者的V̇O2max,并且与HIIT一样安全。此外,MIIT和HIIT在改善HRQoL方面优于常规治疗。临床康复影响:我们的研究结果表明,在急性心肌梗死和CR中低心脏风险患者中,II期CR强度的增加可以在V̇O2max增加方面带来更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of maximal-intensity and high-intensity interval training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: An increase in V̇O2max is important for acute myocardial infarction morbidity, and recurrence rate and intensity have been suggested as important factors in improving V̇O2max.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of maximal-intensity interval training (MIIT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on exercise capacity and health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) at low and moderate cardiac risk in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). This study secondarily aimed to compare the effects of hospital-based phase II CR and usual care.

Design: This study is a randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting.

Population: Fifty-nine patients with acute MI were randomly assigned to the MIIT (N.=30) or HIIT (N.=29) group, and 32 to the usual care group.

Methods: Twice a week, an intervention was conducted for nine weeks in all groups. The maximum oxygen intake (V̇O2max) and MacNew Heart Disease HRQoL were evaluated before and after intervention.

Results: A significant interaction was observed between time and group for V̇O2max (P<0.001). The MIIT group showed greater improvement than those exhibited by the HIIT and usual care groups (P<0.05). Similarly, a significant time and group interaction was observed on the MacNew Global, Physical, and Emotional scales (P<0.05), but not on the social scale (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Compared to HIIT and usual care, MIIT significantly increased the V̇O2max and was as safe as HIIT in patients with acute MI with low and moderate cardiac risk in CR. Additionally, MIIT and HIIT were superior to usual care in terms of improving the HRQoL.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: Our results suggest that increased intensity in phase II CR could result in better outcomes in terms of V̇O2max increment in patients with acute MI and low and moderate cardiac risk in CR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1