儿童和成人流行病相关创伤压力量表的编制和心理测量学验证。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1037/pas0001211
Courtney K Blackwell, Phillip Sherlock, Kathryn L Jackson, Julie A Hofheimer, David Cella, Molly A Algermissen, Akram N Alshawabkeh, Lyndsay A Avalos, Tracy Bastain, Clancy Blair, Michelle Bosquet Enlow, Patricia A Brennan, Carrie Breton, Nicole R Bush, Aruna Chandran, Shaina Collazo, Elisabeth Conradt, Sheila E Crowell, Sean Deoni, Amy J Elliott, Jean A Frazier, Jody M Ganiban, Diane R Gold, Julie B Herbstman, Christine Joseph, Margaret R Karagas, Barry Lester, Jessica A Lasky-Su, Leslie D Leve, Kaja Z LeWinn, W Alex Mason, Elisabeth C McGowan, Kimberly S McKee, Rachel L Miller, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Thomas G O'Connor, Emily Oken, T Michael O'Shea, David Pagliaccio, Rebecca J Schmidt, Anne Marie Singh, Joseph B Stanford, Leonardo Trasande, Rosalind J Wright, Cristiane S Duarte, Amy E Margolis
{"title":"儿童和成人流行病相关创伤压力量表的编制和心理测量学验证。","authors":"Courtney K Blackwell, Phillip Sherlock, Kathryn L Jackson, Julie A Hofheimer, David Cella, Molly A Algermissen, Akram N Alshawabkeh, Lyndsay A Avalos, Tracy Bastain, Clancy Blair, Michelle Bosquet Enlow, Patricia A Brennan, Carrie Breton, Nicole R Bush, Aruna Chandran, Shaina Collazo, Elisabeth Conradt, Sheila E Crowell, Sean Deoni, Amy J Elliott, Jean A Frazier, Jody M Ganiban, Diane R Gold, Julie B Herbstman, Christine Joseph, Margaret R Karagas, Barry Lester, Jessica A Lasky-Su, Leslie D Leve, Kaja Z LeWinn, W Alex Mason, Elisabeth C McGowan, Kimberly S McKee, Rachel L Miller, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Thomas G O'Connor, Emily Oken, T Michael O'Shea, David Pagliaccio, Rebecca J Schmidt, Anne Marie Singh, Joseph B Stanford, Leonardo Trasande, Rosalind J Wright, Cristiane S Duarte, Amy E Margolis","doi":"10.1037/pas0001211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, investigators from the National Institutes of Health Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) research program developed the Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress Scale (PTSS). Based on the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition</i> (DSM-5) acute stress disorder symptom criteria, the PTSS is designed for adolescent (13-21 years) and adult self-report and caregiver-report on 3-12-year-olds. To evaluate psychometric properties, we used PTSS data collected between April 2020 and August 2021 from non-pregnant adult caregivers (<i>n</i> = 11,483), pregnant/postpartum individuals (<i>n</i> = 1,656), adolescents (<i>n</i> = 1,795), and caregivers reporting on 3-12-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 2,896). We used Mokken scale analysis to examine unidimensionality and reliability, Pearson correlations to evaluate relationships with other relevant variables, and analyses of variance to identify regional, age, and sex differences. Mokken analysis resulted in a moderately strong, unidimensional scale that retained nine of the original 10 items. We detected small to moderate positive associations with depression, anxiety, and general stress, and negative associations with life satisfaction. Adult caregivers had the highest PTSS scores, followed by adolescents, pregnant/postpartum individuals, and children. Caregivers of younger children, females, and older youth had higher PTSS scores compared to caregivers of older children, males, and younger youth, respectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and psychometric validation of the Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress Scale for children and adults.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney K Blackwell, Phillip Sherlock, Kathryn L Jackson, Julie A Hofheimer, David Cella, Molly A Algermissen, Akram N Alshawabkeh, Lyndsay A Avalos, Tracy Bastain, Clancy Blair, Michelle Bosquet Enlow, Patricia A Brennan, Carrie Breton, Nicole R Bush, Aruna Chandran, Shaina Collazo, Elisabeth Conradt, Sheila E Crowell, Sean Deoni, Amy J Elliott, Jean A Frazier, Jody M Ganiban, Diane R Gold, Julie B Herbstman, Christine Joseph, Margaret R Karagas, Barry Lester, Jessica A Lasky-Su, Leslie D Leve, Kaja Z LeWinn, W Alex Mason, Elisabeth C McGowan, Kimberly S McKee, Rachel L Miller, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Thomas G O'Connor, Emily Oken, T Michael O'Shea, David Pagliaccio, Rebecca J Schmidt, Anne Marie Singh, Joseph B Stanford, Leonardo Trasande, Rosalind J Wright, Cristiane S Duarte, Amy E Margolis\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pas0001211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assess the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, investigators from the National Institutes of Health Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) research program developed the Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress Scale (PTSS). Based on the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition</i> (DSM-5) acute stress disorder symptom criteria, the PTSS is designed for adolescent (13-21 years) and adult self-report and caregiver-report on 3-12-year-olds. To evaluate psychometric properties, we used PTSS data collected between April 2020 and August 2021 from non-pregnant adult caregivers (<i>n</i> = 11,483), pregnant/postpartum individuals (<i>n</i> = 1,656), adolescents (<i>n</i> = 1,795), and caregivers reporting on 3-12-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 2,896). We used Mokken scale analysis to examine unidimensionality and reliability, Pearson correlations to evaluate relationships with other relevant variables, and analyses of variance to identify regional, age, and sex differences. Mokken analysis resulted in a moderately strong, unidimensional scale that retained nine of the original 10 items. We detected small to moderate positive associations with depression, anxiety, and general stress, and negative associations with life satisfaction. Adult caregivers had the highest PTSS scores, followed by adolescents, pregnant/postpartum individuals, and children. Caregivers of younger children, females, and older youth had higher PTSS scores compared to caregivers of older children, males, and younger youth, respectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Assessment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001211\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估新冠肺炎大流行对心理健康的公共健康影响,美国国立卫生研究院环境对儿童健康结果的影响(ECHO)研究项目的研究人员开发了与流行病相关的创伤压力量表(PTSS)。根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)急性应激障碍症状标准,创伤后应激障碍是为青少年(13-21岁)和成人对3-12岁儿童的自我报告和照顾者报告而设计的。为了评估心理测量特性,我们使用了2020年4月至2021年8月期间从非怀孕成人护理人员(n=11483)、怀孕/产后个体(n=1656)、青少年(n=1795)和3-12岁护理人员(n=2896)收集的PTSS数据。我们使用莫肯量表分析来检验单维度和可靠性,使用皮尔逊相关性来评估与其他相关变量的关系,并使用方差分析来识别区域、年龄和性别差异。莫肯分析得出了一个中等强度的一维量表,保留了最初10个项目中的9个。我们发现了与抑郁、焦虑和一般压力的小到中度正相关,与生活满意度的负相关。成人护理人员的创伤后应激障碍评分最高,其次是青少年、孕妇/产后个体和儿童。与年龄较大的儿童、男性和年轻人的照顾者相比,年龄较小的儿童、女性和年长青年的照顾者的创伤后应激障碍得分较高。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and psychometric validation of the Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress Scale for children and adults.

To assess the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, investigators from the National Institutes of Health Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) research program developed the Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress Scale (PTSS). Based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) acute stress disorder symptom criteria, the PTSS is designed for adolescent (13-21 years) and adult self-report and caregiver-report on 3-12-year-olds. To evaluate psychometric properties, we used PTSS data collected between April 2020 and August 2021 from non-pregnant adult caregivers (n = 11,483), pregnant/postpartum individuals (n = 1,656), adolescents (n = 1,795), and caregivers reporting on 3-12-year-olds (n = 2,896). We used Mokken scale analysis to examine unidimensionality and reliability, Pearson correlations to evaluate relationships with other relevant variables, and analyses of variance to identify regional, age, and sex differences. Mokken analysis resulted in a moderately strong, unidimensional scale that retained nine of the original 10 items. We detected small to moderate positive associations with depression, anxiety, and general stress, and negative associations with life satisfaction. Adult caregivers had the highest PTSS scores, followed by adolescents, pregnant/postpartum individuals, and children. Caregivers of younger children, females, and older youth had higher PTSS scores compared to caregivers of older children, males, and younger youth, respectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a method for deriving MMPI-3 scores from MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF item responses. Evaluation of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) Unlikely Virtues Scale in the detection of underreporting. Prospectively predicting violent and aggressive incidents in prison practice with the Risk Screener Violence (RS-V): Results from a multisite prison study. Development of the Food Addiction Symptom Inventory: The first clinical interview to assess ultra-processed food addiction. Does the Bayley-4 measure the same constructs across girls and boys and infants, toddlers, and preschoolers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1