使用在线门户进行门诊登记。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2023-10-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2023.0026
Maikel Immens, Esther Verstraete, Gerdy Klein Bleumink, Ron Pisters
{"title":"使用在线门户进行门诊登记。","authors":"Maikel Immens,&nbsp;Esther Verstraete,&nbsp;Gerdy Klein Bleumink,&nbsp;Ron Pisters","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite ongoing digital and technological developments, incorporation of new developments in outpatient care tends to be slow. Regarding an increasing demand for outpatient care, digitalization of health care carries the potential of a much needed more efficient and patient-oriented system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To optimize classic face-to-face outpatient clinic follow-up consultations and evaluate the added value of an upfront digital consult preparation (DCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Rijnstate Hospital (Arnhem, the Netherlands) among all consecutive patients, 18 years or older, who visited the Cardiology (in June 2021) or Neurology (in September 2021) outpatient clinic. All received a DCP survey before their scheduled outpatient clinic appointment, containing three questions regarding their upcoming visit. In addition, the involved health care providers were approached by using a questionnaire to share their experience regarding the DCP. Data concerning the experience of patients and health care providers was anonymous and gathered using Qualtrics.com.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 25 involved health care providers (12 cardiologists, 13 neurologists) provided feedback. According to the health care providers DCP decreased the workload and improved theirs and patients' preparation. In total, 785 of 1626 (48.3%) patients filled-in the DCP before their appointment within a predetermined period. Only 4% of the patients wanted to change or cancel the consultation. A total of 122 of the 300 (40.1%) patients approached, filled-in a questionnaire to reflect on the DCP. Patients experienced DCP as an improvement of consultation, more time-efficient, increasing patients' and health care providers' preparation, increasing a feeling of acknowledgement and improving co-decision on type of consultation. The DCP did not attribute to co-deciding on treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCP was perceived as an improvement of the standard outpatient care by both health care providers and patients with automated integration into the electronic patient record being of key importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"336-342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient Check-In Using an Online Portal.\",\"authors\":\"Maikel Immens,&nbsp;Esther Verstraete,&nbsp;Gerdy Klein Bleumink,&nbsp;Ron Pisters\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2023.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite ongoing digital and technological developments, incorporation of new developments in outpatient care tends to be slow. Regarding an increasing demand for outpatient care, digitalization of health care carries the potential of a much needed more efficient and patient-oriented system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To optimize classic face-to-face outpatient clinic follow-up consultations and evaluate the added value of an upfront digital consult preparation (DCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Rijnstate Hospital (Arnhem, the Netherlands) among all consecutive patients, 18 years or older, who visited the Cardiology (in June 2021) or Neurology (in September 2021) outpatient clinic. All received a DCP survey before their scheduled outpatient clinic appointment, containing three questions regarding their upcoming visit. In addition, the involved health care providers were approached by using a questionnaire to share their experience regarding the DCP. Data concerning the experience of patients and health care providers was anonymous and gathered using Qualtrics.com.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 25 involved health care providers (12 cardiologists, 13 neurologists) provided feedback. According to the health care providers DCP decreased the workload and improved theirs and patients' preparation. In total, 785 of 1626 (48.3%) patients filled-in the DCP before their appointment within a predetermined period. Only 4% of the patients wanted to change or cancel the consultation. A total of 122 of the 300 (40.1%) patients approached, filled-in a questionnaire to reflect on the DCP. Patients experienced DCP as an improvement of consultation, more time-efficient, increasing patients' and health care providers' preparation, increasing a feeling of acknowledgement and improving co-decision on type of consultation. The DCP did not attribute to co-deciding on treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCP was perceived as an improvement of the standard outpatient care by both health care providers and patients with automated integration into the electronic patient record being of key importance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"336-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管数字和技术不断发展,但将新的发展纳入门诊护理往往进展缓慢。关于对门诊护理日益增长的需求,医疗保健的数字化带来了一个急需的更高效和以患者为导向的系统的潜力。目的:优化经典的面对面门诊随访咨询,并评估前期数字咨询准备(DCP)的附加值。方法:在荷兰阿纳姆的Rijnstate医院对所有18岁或以上的连续患者进行横断面观察性研究,他访问了心脏病学(2021年6月)或神经病学(2021年9月)门诊。所有人在预约门诊前都接受了DCP调查,其中包括关于即将就诊的三个问题。此外,还通过问卷调查与相关的医疗保健提供者联系,分享他们在DCP方面的经验。有关患者和医疗保健提供者经历的数据是匿名的,并使用Qualtrics.com收集。结果:所有25名参与的医疗保健提供者(12名心脏病专家,13名神经科专家)都提供了反馈。根据卫生保健提供者的说法,DCP减少了工作量,改善了他们和患者的准备工作。总的来说,1626名患者中有785人(48.3%)在预约前在预定时间内填写了DCP。只有4%的患者希望改变或取消咨询。在300名患者中,共有122人(40.1%)进行了接触,填写了一份问卷以反映DCP。患者体验DCP是一种咨询的改进,更具时间效率,增加了患者和医疗保健提供者的准备,增加了认可感,并改善了对咨询类型的共同决策。DCP没有将其归因于共同决定治疗。结论:DCP被卫生保健提供者和患者视为标准门诊护理的改进,自动整合到电子病历中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outpatient Check-In Using an Online Portal.

Background: Despite ongoing digital and technological developments, incorporation of new developments in outpatient care tends to be slow. Regarding an increasing demand for outpatient care, digitalization of health care carries the potential of a much needed more efficient and patient-oriented system.

Objective: To optimize classic face-to-face outpatient clinic follow-up consultations and evaluate the added value of an upfront digital consult preparation (DCP).

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Rijnstate Hospital (Arnhem, the Netherlands) among all consecutive patients, 18 years or older, who visited the Cardiology (in June 2021) or Neurology (in September 2021) outpatient clinic. All received a DCP survey before their scheduled outpatient clinic appointment, containing three questions regarding their upcoming visit. In addition, the involved health care providers were approached by using a questionnaire to share their experience regarding the DCP. Data concerning the experience of patients and health care providers was anonymous and gathered using Qualtrics.com.

Results: All 25 involved health care providers (12 cardiologists, 13 neurologists) provided feedback. According to the health care providers DCP decreased the workload and improved theirs and patients' preparation. In total, 785 of 1626 (48.3%) patients filled-in the DCP before their appointment within a predetermined period. Only 4% of the patients wanted to change or cancel the consultation. A total of 122 of the 300 (40.1%) patients approached, filled-in a questionnaire to reflect on the DCP. Patients experienced DCP as an improvement of consultation, more time-efficient, increasing patients' and health care providers' preparation, increasing a feeling of acknowledgement and improving co-decision on type of consultation. The DCP did not attribute to co-deciding on treatment.

Conclusion: DCP was perceived as an improvement of the standard outpatient care by both health care providers and patients with automated integration into the electronic patient record being of key importance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Poor Representation of Rural Counties of the United States in Some Measures of Consumer Broadband. A Systematic Review of Telehealth Applications in Endocrinology. Exploring Barriers Toward Telehealth in an Underserved, Uninsured Patient Population. Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Wound Checks Following Mohs Surgery: A Pilot Study. Telemedicine Use Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in People with Alzheimer's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, or Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study Using US Commercial Claims Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1