拉丁裔糖尿病患者对远程眼科、基于人工智能的图像解释和虚拟护理的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2023-10-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2023.0045
Christian Pelayo, Johnson Hoang, Maria Mora Pinzón, Loren J Lock, Christiana Fowlkes, Chloe L Stevens, Nora A Jacobson, Roomasa Channa, Yao Liu
{"title":"拉丁裔糖尿病患者对远程眼科、基于人工智能的图像解释和虚拟护理的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Christian Pelayo, Johnson Hoang, Maria Mora Pinzón, Loren J Lock, Christiana Fowlkes, Chloe L Stevens, Nora A Jacobson, Roomasa Channa, Yao Liu","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latinx populations in the United States bear a disproportionate burden of diabetic eye disease. Teleophthalmology with and without artificial intelligence (AI)-based image interpretation are validated methods for diabetic eye screening, but limited literature exists on patient perspectives. This study aimed at understanding the perspectives of Latinx patients with diabetes on teleophthalmology, AI-based image interpretation, and general virtual care to prevent avoidable blindness in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured, individual interviews with 20 Latinx patients with diabetes at an urban, federally qualified health center in Madison, WI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, professionally translated from Spanish to English, and analyzed using both inductive open coding and deductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants had no prior experience with teleophthalmology but did have experience with virtual care. Participants expressed a preference for teleophthalmology compared with traditional in-person dilated eye exams but were willing to obtain whichever method of screening was recommended by their primary care clinician. They also strongly preferred having human physician oversight in image review compared with having images interpreted solely using AI. Many participants preferred in-person clinic visits to virtual health care due to the ability to have a more thorough physical exam, as well as for improved non-verbal communication with their clinician.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Leveraging primary care providers' recommendations, human oversight of AI-based image interpretation, and improving communication may enhance acceptance and utilization of teleophthalmology, AI, and virtual care by Latinx patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding Latinx patient perspectives may contribute toward the development of more effective telemedicine interventions to enhance health equity in Latinx communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"317-326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of Latinx Patients with Diabetes on Teleophthalmology, Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Interpretation, and Virtual Care: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Pelayo, Johnson Hoang, Maria Mora Pinzón, Loren J Lock, Christiana Fowlkes, Chloe L Stevens, Nora A Jacobson, Roomasa Channa, Yao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2023.0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latinx populations in the United States bear a disproportionate burden of diabetic eye disease. Teleophthalmology with and without artificial intelligence (AI)-based image interpretation are validated methods for diabetic eye screening, but limited literature exists on patient perspectives. This study aimed at understanding the perspectives of Latinx patients with diabetes on teleophthalmology, AI-based image interpretation, and general virtual care to prevent avoidable blindness in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured, individual interviews with 20 Latinx patients with diabetes at an urban, federally qualified health center in Madison, WI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, professionally translated from Spanish to English, and analyzed using both inductive open coding and deductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants had no prior experience with teleophthalmology but did have experience with virtual care. Participants expressed a preference for teleophthalmology compared with traditional in-person dilated eye exams but were willing to obtain whichever method of screening was recommended by their primary care clinician. They also strongly preferred having human physician oversight in image review compared with having images interpreted solely using AI. Many participants preferred in-person clinic visits to virtual health care due to the ability to have a more thorough physical exam, as well as for improved non-verbal communication with their clinician.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Leveraging primary care providers' recommendations, human oversight of AI-based image interpretation, and improving communication may enhance acceptance and utilization of teleophthalmology, AI, and virtual care by Latinx patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding Latinx patient perspectives may contribute toward the development of more effective telemedicine interventions to enhance health equity in Latinx communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"317-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国的拉丁裔人口承受着不成比例的糖尿病眼病负担。有和没有基于人工智能(AI)的图像解释的远程眼科是糖尿病眼睛筛查的有效方法,但关于患者视角的文献有限。本研究旨在了解拉丁裔糖尿病患者对远视眼科、基于人工智能的图像解释和一般虚拟护理的看法,以防止该人群中可避免的失明。方法:我们在威斯康星州麦迪逊市一家联邦政府认可的城市健康中心对20名拉丁裔糖尿病患者进行了半结构化的个人访谈。访谈被逐字转录,从西班牙语专业翻译成英语,并使用归纳开放编码和演绎编码进行分析。结果:大多数参与者之前没有远视眼科的经验,但有虚拟护理的经验。与传统的面对面扩眼检查相比,参与者表示更喜欢远视眼科检查,但他们愿意接受初级保健临床医生推荐的任何筛查方法。与仅使用人工智能解读图像相比,他们还强烈希望在图像审查中由医生监督。许多参与者更喜欢亲自去诊所看虚拟医疗,因为他们能够进行更彻底的体检,并改善与临床医生的非语言沟通。讨论:利用初级保健提供者的建议,人类对基于人工智能的图像解释的监督,以及改善沟通,可能会提高拉丁裔患者对目的眼科、人工智能和虚拟护理的接受和利用率。结论:了解拉丁裔患者的观点可能有助于开发更有效的远程医疗干预措施,以提高拉丁裔社区的健康公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives of Latinx Patients with Diabetes on Teleophthalmology, Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Interpretation, and Virtual Care: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Latinx populations in the United States bear a disproportionate burden of diabetic eye disease. Teleophthalmology with and without artificial intelligence (AI)-based image interpretation are validated methods for diabetic eye screening, but limited literature exists on patient perspectives. This study aimed at understanding the perspectives of Latinx patients with diabetes on teleophthalmology, AI-based image interpretation, and general virtual care to prevent avoidable blindness in this population.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured, individual interviews with 20 Latinx patients with diabetes at an urban, federally qualified health center in Madison, WI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, professionally translated from Spanish to English, and analyzed using both inductive open coding and deductive coding.

Results: Most participants had no prior experience with teleophthalmology but did have experience with virtual care. Participants expressed a preference for teleophthalmology compared with traditional in-person dilated eye exams but were willing to obtain whichever method of screening was recommended by their primary care clinician. They also strongly preferred having human physician oversight in image review compared with having images interpreted solely using AI. Many participants preferred in-person clinic visits to virtual health care due to the ability to have a more thorough physical exam, as well as for improved non-verbal communication with their clinician.

Discussion: Leveraging primary care providers' recommendations, human oversight of AI-based image interpretation, and improving communication may enhance acceptance and utilization of teleophthalmology, AI, and virtual care by Latinx patients.

Conclusions: Understanding Latinx patient perspectives may contribute toward the development of more effective telemedicine interventions to enhance health equity in Latinx communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Poor Representation of Rural Counties of the United States in Some Measures of Consumer Broadband. A Systematic Review of Telehealth Applications in Endocrinology. Exploring Barriers Toward Telehealth in an Underserved, Uninsured Patient Population. Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Wound Checks Following Mohs Surgery: A Pilot Study. Telemedicine Use Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in People with Alzheimer's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, or Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study Using US Commercial Claims Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1