ISCEV标准模式逆转VEP发展:649名健康受试者的儿科参考限值。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Documenta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s10633-023-09952-9
Dorothy A Thompson, Eszter Mikó-Baráth, Sharon E Hardy, Gábor Jandó, Martin Shaw, Ruth Hamilton
{"title":"ISCEV标准模式逆转VEP发展:649名健康受试者的儿科参考限值。","authors":"Dorothy A Thompson, Eszter Mikó-Baráth, Sharon E Hardy, Gábor Jandó, Martin Shaw, Ruth Hamilton","doi":"10.1007/s10633-023-09952-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish the extent of agreement for ISCEV standard reference pattern reversal VEPs (prVEPs) acquired at three European centres, to determine any effect of sex, and to establish reference intervals from birth to adolescence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PrVEPs were recorded from healthy reference infants and children, aged 2 weeks to 16 years, from three centres using closely matched but non-identical protocols. Amplitudes and peak times were modelled with orthogonal quadratic and sigmoidal curves, respectively, and two-sided limits, 2.5th and 97.5th centiles, estimated using nonlinear quantile Bayesian regression. Data were compared by centre and by sex using median quantile confidence intervals. The 'critical age', i.e. age at which P100 peak time ceased to shorten, was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from the three centres were adequately comparable. Sex differences were not clinically meaningful. The pooled data showed rapid drops in P100 peak time which stabilised by 27 and by 34 weeks for large and small check widths, respectively. Post-critical-age reference limits were 87-115 ms and 96-131 ms for large and small check widths, respectively. Amplitudes varied markedly and reference limits for all ages were 5-57 μV and 3.5-56 μV for large and small check widths, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrVEP reference data could be combined despite some methodology differences within the tolerances of the ISCEV VEP Standard, supporting the clinical benefit of ISCEV Standards. Comparison with historical data is hampered by lack of minimum reporting guidelines. The reference data presented here could be validated or transformed for use elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ISCEV standard pattern reversal VEP development: paediatric reference limits from 649 healthy subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Dorothy A Thompson, Eszter Mikó-Baráth, Sharon E Hardy, Gábor Jandó, Martin Shaw, Ruth Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10633-023-09952-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish the extent of agreement for ISCEV standard reference pattern reversal VEPs (prVEPs) acquired at three European centres, to determine any effect of sex, and to establish reference intervals from birth to adolescence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PrVEPs were recorded from healthy reference infants and children, aged 2 weeks to 16 years, from three centres using closely matched but non-identical protocols. Amplitudes and peak times were modelled with orthogonal quadratic and sigmoidal curves, respectively, and two-sided limits, 2.5th and 97.5th centiles, estimated using nonlinear quantile Bayesian regression. Data were compared by centre and by sex using median quantile confidence intervals. The 'critical age', i.e. age at which P100 peak time ceased to shorten, was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from the three centres were adequately comparable. Sex differences were not clinically meaningful. The pooled data showed rapid drops in P100 peak time which stabilised by 27 and by 34 weeks for large and small check widths, respectively. Post-critical-age reference limits were 87-115 ms and 96-131 ms for large and small check widths, respectively. Amplitudes varied markedly and reference limits for all ages were 5-57 μV and 3.5-56 μV for large and small check widths, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrVEP reference data could be combined despite some methodology differences within the tolerances of the ISCEV VEP Standard, supporting the clinical benefit of ISCEV Standards. Comparison with historical data is hampered by lack of minimum reporting guidelines. The reference data presented here could be validated or transformed for use elsewhere.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Documenta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Documenta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-023-09952-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-023-09952-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定在三个欧洲中心获得的ISCEV标准参考模式逆转VEP(prVEP)的一致性程度,确定性别的任何影响,并确定从出生到青春期的参考间隔。方法:使用密切匹配但不完全相同的方案,记录来自三个中心的2周至16岁的健康参考婴儿和儿童的PrVEP。振幅和峰值时间分别用正交二次曲线和S形曲线建模,双侧极限分别为2.5和97.5厘,用非线性分位数贝叶斯回归估计。使用中位数分位数置信区间按中心和性别对数据进行比较。计算“临界年龄”,即P100峰值时间停止缩短的年龄。结果:三个中心的数据具有充分的可比性。性别差异没有临床意义。汇总数据显示,P100峰值时间迅速下降,对于大检查宽度和小检查宽度,峰值时间分别稳定了27周和34周。大检查宽度和小检查宽度的临界年龄后参考限值分别为87-115 ms和96-131 ms。振幅变化显著,所有年龄段的大检查宽度和小检查宽度的参考限分别为5-57μV和3.5-56μV。结论:尽管在ISCEV VEP标准的容许范围内存在一些方法差异,但PrVEP参考数据可以合并,支持ISCEV标准的临床益处。由于缺乏最低报告准则,与历史数据的比较受到阻碍。此处提供的参考数据可以进行验证或转换,以便在其他地方使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ISCEV standard pattern reversal VEP development: paediatric reference limits from 649 healthy subjects.

Purpose: To establish the extent of agreement for ISCEV standard reference pattern reversal VEPs (prVEPs) acquired at three European centres, to determine any effect of sex, and to establish reference intervals from birth to adolescence.

Methods: PrVEPs were recorded from healthy reference infants and children, aged 2 weeks to 16 years, from three centres using closely matched but non-identical protocols. Amplitudes and peak times were modelled with orthogonal quadratic and sigmoidal curves, respectively, and two-sided limits, 2.5th and 97.5th centiles, estimated using nonlinear quantile Bayesian regression. Data were compared by centre and by sex using median quantile confidence intervals. The 'critical age', i.e. age at which P100 peak time ceased to shorten, was calculated.

Results: Data from the three centres were adequately comparable. Sex differences were not clinically meaningful. The pooled data showed rapid drops in P100 peak time which stabilised by 27 and by 34 weeks for large and small check widths, respectively. Post-critical-age reference limits were 87-115 ms and 96-131 ms for large and small check widths, respectively. Amplitudes varied markedly and reference limits for all ages were 5-57 μV and 3.5-56 μV for large and small check widths, respectively.

Conclusions: PrVEP reference data could be combined despite some methodology differences within the tolerances of the ISCEV VEP Standard, supporting the clinical benefit of ISCEV Standards. Comparison with historical data is hampered by lack of minimum reporting guidelines. The reference data presented here could be validated or transformed for use elsewhere.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Documenta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Documenta Ophthalmologica is an official publication of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. The purpose of the journal is to promote the understanding and application of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Documenta Ophthalmologica will publish reviews, research articles, technical notes, brief reports and case studies which inform the readers about basic and clinical sciences related to visual electrodiagnosis and means to improve diagnosis and clinical management of patients using visual electrophysiology. Studies may involve animals or humans. In either case appropriate care must be taken to follow the Declaration of Helsinki for human subject or appropriate humane standards of animal care (e.g., the ARVO standards on Animal Care and Use).
期刊最新文献
Vitamin A deficiency retinopathy in the setting of celiac disease and liver fibrosis. The FreiBurger: a new optotype for P300-based acuity estimation. Non-syndromic OTX2-associated pattern dystrophy: a 10-year multimodal imaging study. Rod-sparing in a bardet-biedl syndrome patient with mutations in the ARL6 gene. Ambient lighting alters pattern electroretinogram P50 peak time and spatial sensitivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1