Kaityn Contino, Julie M. Campbell, Emily C. Marcinowski, George F. Michel, Michelle L. Ramos, Stefany Coxe, Timothy Hayes, Eliza L. Nelson
{"title":"手偏好轨迹是SES以上语言结果的预测因素:婴儿模式比5岁时的幼儿模式解释更多的差异 年龄","authors":"Kaityn Contino, Julie M. Campbell, Emily C. Marcinowski, George F. Michel, Michelle L. Ramos, Stefany Coxe, Timothy Hayes, Eliza L. Nelson","doi":"10.1002/icd.2468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Prior studies found that hand preference trajectories predict preschool language outcomes. However, this approach has been limited to examining bimanual manipulation in toddlers. It is not known whether hand preference during infancy for acquiring objects (i.e., reach-to-grasp) similarly predicts childhood language ability. The current study explored this motor-language developmental cascade in 90 children. Hand preference for acquiring objects was assessed monthly from 6 to 14 months, and language skill was assessed at 5 years. Latent class growth analysis identified three infant hand preference classes: left, early right and late right. Infant hand preference classes predicted 5-year language skills. Children in the left and early right classes, who were categorized as having a consistent hand preference, had higher expressive and receptive language scores relative to children in the inconsistent late right class. Consistent classes did not differ from each other on language outcomes. Infant hand preference patterns explained more variance for expressive and receptive language relative to previously reported toddler hand preference patterns, above and beyond socio-economic status. Results suggest that hand preference, measured at different time points across development using a trajectory approach, is reliably linked to later language.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Hand preference trajectories reliably predict preschool language above and beyond SES.</li>\n \n <li>Infants with a consistent hand preference for reaching had greater language skills at 5 years.</li>\n \n <li>Infant hand preference explained more variance in language than toddler hand preference.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand preference trajectories as predictors of language outcomes above and beyond SES: Infant patterns explain more variance than toddler patterns at 5 years of age\",\"authors\":\"Kaityn Contino, Julie M. Campbell, Emily C. Marcinowski, George F. Michel, Michelle L. Ramos, Stefany Coxe, Timothy Hayes, Eliza L. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/icd.2468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Prior studies found that hand preference trajectories predict preschool language outcomes. However, this approach has been limited to examining bimanual manipulation in toddlers. It is not known whether hand preference during infancy for acquiring objects (i.e., reach-to-grasp) similarly predicts childhood language ability. The current study explored this motor-language developmental cascade in 90 children. Hand preference for acquiring objects was assessed monthly from 6 to 14 months, and language skill was assessed at 5 years. Latent class growth analysis identified three infant hand preference classes: left, early right and late right. Infant hand preference classes predicted 5-year language skills. Children in the left and early right classes, who were categorized as having a consistent hand preference, had higher expressive and receptive language scores relative to children in the inconsistent late right class. Consistent classes did not differ from each other on language outcomes. Infant hand preference patterns explained more variance for expressive and receptive language relative to previously reported toddler hand preference patterns, above and beyond socio-economic status. Results suggest that hand preference, measured at different time points across development using a trajectory approach, is reliably linked to later language.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Hand preference trajectories reliably predict preschool language above and beyond SES.</li>\\n \\n <li>Infants with a consistent hand preference for reaching had greater language skills at 5 years.</li>\\n \\n <li>Infant hand preference explained more variance in language than toddler hand preference.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant and Child Development\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant and Child Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2468\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant and Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hand preference trajectories as predictors of language outcomes above and beyond SES: Infant patterns explain more variance than toddler patterns at 5 years of age
Prior studies found that hand preference trajectories predict preschool language outcomes. However, this approach has been limited to examining bimanual manipulation in toddlers. It is not known whether hand preference during infancy for acquiring objects (i.e., reach-to-grasp) similarly predicts childhood language ability. The current study explored this motor-language developmental cascade in 90 children. Hand preference for acquiring objects was assessed monthly from 6 to 14 months, and language skill was assessed at 5 years. Latent class growth analysis identified three infant hand preference classes: left, early right and late right. Infant hand preference classes predicted 5-year language skills. Children in the left and early right classes, who were categorized as having a consistent hand preference, had higher expressive and receptive language scores relative to children in the inconsistent late right class. Consistent classes did not differ from each other on language outcomes. Infant hand preference patterns explained more variance for expressive and receptive language relative to previously reported toddler hand preference patterns, above and beyond socio-economic status. Results suggest that hand preference, measured at different time points across development using a trajectory approach, is reliably linked to later language.
Highlights
Hand preference trajectories reliably predict preschool language above and beyond SES.
Infants with a consistent hand preference for reaching had greater language skills at 5 years.
Infant hand preference explained more variance in language than toddler hand preference.
期刊介绍:
Infant and Child Development publishes high quality empirical, theoretical and methodological papers addressing psychological development from the antenatal period through to adolescence. The journal brings together research on: - social and emotional development - perceptual and motor development - cognitive development - language development atypical development (including conduct problems, anxiety and depressive conditions, language impairments, autistic spectrum disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders)