Gary Ulrich, Kameron Kraus, Seth Polk, David Zuelzer, Paul E Matuszewski
{"title":"在老年髋部骨折中实施髂筋膜隔室阻滞计划:一级学术创伤中心的经验。","authors":"Gary Ulrich, Kameron Kraus, Seth Polk, David Zuelzer, Paul E Matuszewski","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine adherence to a newly implemented protocol of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in geriatric hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients with a hip fracture treated with cephalomedullary nailing or hemiarthroplasty (CPT codes 27245 or 27236).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Adherence to a protocol for FICB, time intervals between emergency department arrival, FICB, and surgery stratified by time of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred eighty patients were studied (average age 78 years, 70% female). Approximately 53.2% of patients received an FICB, which was less than a predefined acceptable adherence rate of 75% ( P < 0.001). Approximately 5.0% received an FICB within 4 hours and 17.3% within 6 hours from admission. Admission during daylight hours (7 am -7p m ) when compared with evening hours (7 pm -7 am ) was associated with improved timeliness ([8.3% vs. 0% within 4 hours, P < 0.001] [27.5% vs. 2.4% within 6 hours, P < 0.001]). Improved adherence to the protocol was observed over time (odds ratio: 1.0013, 95% confidence interval, 1.0001-1.0025, P = 0.0388).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FICB implementation was poor but gradually improved over time. Few patients received an FICB promptly, especially during night hours. Overall, this study demonstrates that implementation of an FICB program at a Level I academic trauma center can be difficult; however, many hurdles can be overcome with institutional support and dedication of resources such as staff, space, and additional training.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Program in Geriatric Hip Fractures: The Experience at a Level I Academic Trauma Center.\",\"authors\":\"Gary Ulrich, Kameron Kraus, Seth Polk, David Zuelzer, Paul E Matuszewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine adherence to a newly implemented protocol of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in geriatric hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients with a hip fracture treated with cephalomedullary nailing or hemiarthroplasty (CPT codes 27245 or 27236).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Adherence to a protocol for FICB, time intervals between emergency department arrival, FICB, and surgery stratified by time of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred eighty patients were studied (average age 78 years, 70% female). Approximately 53.2% of patients received an FICB, which was less than a predefined acceptable adherence rate of 75% ( P < 0.001). Approximately 5.0% received an FICB within 4 hours and 17.3% within 6 hours from admission. Admission during daylight hours (7 am -7p m ) when compared with evening hours (7 pm -7 am ) was associated with improved timeliness ([8.3% vs. 0% within 4 hours, P < 0.001] [27.5% vs. 2.4% within 6 hours, P < 0.001]). Improved adherence to the protocol was observed over time (odds ratio: 1.0013, 95% confidence interval, 1.0001-1.0025, P = 0.0388).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FICB implementation was poor but gradually improved over time. Few patients received an FICB promptly, especially during night hours. Overall, this study demonstrates that implementation of an FICB program at a Level I academic trauma center can be difficult; however, many hurdles can be overcome with institutional support and dedication of resources such as staff, space, and additional training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"96-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002722\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of a Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Program in Geriatric Hip Fractures: The Experience at a Level I Academic Trauma Center.
Objectives: Determine adherence to a newly implemented protocol of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in geriatric hip fractures.
Methods:
Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Level I trauma center.
Patient selection criteria: Patients with a hip fracture treated with cephalomedullary nailing or hemiarthroplasty (CPT codes 27245 or 27236).
Outcome measures and comparisons: Adherence to a protocol for FICB, time intervals between emergency department arrival, FICB, and surgery stratified by time of admission.
Results: Three hundred eighty patients were studied (average age 78 years, 70% female). Approximately 53.2% of patients received an FICB, which was less than a predefined acceptable adherence rate of 75% ( P < 0.001). Approximately 5.0% received an FICB within 4 hours and 17.3% within 6 hours from admission. Admission during daylight hours (7 am -7p m ) when compared with evening hours (7 pm -7 am ) was associated with improved timeliness ([8.3% vs. 0% within 4 hours, P < 0.001] [27.5% vs. 2.4% within 6 hours, P < 0.001]). Improved adherence to the protocol was observed over time (odds ratio: 1.0013, 95% confidence interval, 1.0001-1.0025, P = 0.0388).
Conclusions: FICB implementation was poor but gradually improved over time. Few patients received an FICB promptly, especially during night hours. Overall, this study demonstrates that implementation of an FICB program at a Level I academic trauma center can be difficult; however, many hurdles can be overcome with institutional support and dedication of resources such as staff, space, and additional training.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.